Chief the reincarnation of Bornsteller-Didact?

Has anyone heard this theory before with the references of what Guilty Spark said to Chief in Halo one referring to the conversation with the IsoDidact / Bornsteller-Didact before the activation of the Halo Rings, this could indeed mean that the Librarian imprinted the Chief with his geas/genesong, but that’s just the theory, BUT!!!

In Halo 5 when blue team is trying to reach Cortana, the Warden Eternal calls Chief a Warrior Servant, did anyone hear that during the campaign?
I mean that just adds to the theory that the Master Chief could indeed be the reincarnation of the IsoDidact, anyone agree?

I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.

> 2533274805913959;2:
> I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.

Indeed, but then there’s the question of why would he call Chief that, there is no other underlining reason for him to do so

I noticed that too. I also noticed how the music seemed to have a dramatic twist when he said it as though an important plot point was revealed.

Don’t remember the Warrior Servant bit, but the theory is out there. The lack of an actual reference to what The Librarian did to the Chief in Halo 4 and other Forerunner lore that could be connected to all of that is one reason why I kind of feel like this campaign was just a setup to the next campaign. It’s a very good theory, but Halo 5 did next to nothing to add to it.

I just thought of something today. Is it actually possible for Chief to have Bornstellar’s geas? It is speculated that Bornstellar is still alive and he contained himself in a Cryptum or a stasis bubble so he didn’t die of old age. Even if this isn’t true and he is dead, wouldn’t the Librarian have had to use the Composer to extract his essence?

> 2533274820230754;6:
> I just thought of something today. Is it actually possible for Chief to have Bornstellar’s geas? It is speculated that Bornstellar is still alive and he contained himself in a Cryptum or a stasis bubble so he didn’t die of old age. Even if this isn’t true and he is dead, wouldn’t the Librarian have had to use the Composer to extract his essence?

Forerunners don’t die because of age bruh.

> 2533274843069928;3:
> > 2533274805913959;2:
> > I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.
>
>
> Indeed, but then there’s the question of why would he call Chief that, there is no other underlining reason for him to do so

Because that is the terminology familiar to the Warden. The Didact called Cortana an ancilla after all despite her not being a Forerunner AI.

> 2533274843069928;1:
> Has anyone heard this theory before with the references of what Guilty Spark said to Chief in Halo one referring to the conversation with the IsoDidact / Bornsteller-Didact before the activation of the Halo Rings, this could indeed mean that the Librarian imprinted the Chief with his geas/genesong, but that’s just the theory, BUT!!!
>
>
>
> In Halo 5 when blue team is trying to reach Cortana, the Warden Eternal calls Chief a Warrior Servant, did anyone hear that during the campaign?
> I mean that just adds to the theory that the Master Chief could indeed be the reincarnation of the IsoDidact, anyone agree?
>

The Librarian only activated his imprint, and I’m pretty sure it’s the Didact as Chief began hearing him in his head after his imprint was activated. The Warden also told him something about his true self before becoming 117.

> 2533274843069928;3:
> > 2533274805913959;2:
> > I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.
>
>
> Indeed, but then there’s the question of why would he call Chief that, there is no other underlining reason for him to do so

Well the Liberian called the Spartan armor combat skin and Cortana an Ancilla (same with the Didact) so its simply just that to them it is warrior servants, combat skin and ancillas for human soldiers, spartan armor and A.I.

> 2533274812652989;8:
> > 2533274843069928;3:
> > > 2533274805913959;2:
> > > I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.
> >
> >
> > Indeed, but then there’s the question of why would he call Chief that, there is no other underlining reason for him to do so
>
>
> Because that is the terminology familiar to the Warden. The Didact called Cortana an ancilla after all despite her not being a Forerunner AI.

But the Didact called Chief simply warrior, not Warrior-Servant.

I don’t think Chief could be the iso simply because iso was made when ur put all his consciousness and memories into iso to make him so unless the ur or the iso did the same he wouldn’t be either of them. Plus the Geas the Liberian made was one of the old humans to make the current humans.

Most likely a forerunner term for a soldier. Exuberant Witness also calls Locke and his team warrior servants and how different their interaction is as oppose to builders.

No I don’t think he is.

I think Halsey and Chief are 2 sides to a coin. Like the Janus key having 2 sides. Metaphorically.
I think there has to be a reason why Halsey was so obsessed and insisting that she met John and I don’t think it’s just for their history either.
So we know the librarian has imprented geas on Halsey and John. I think the next step is maybe Halsey helping Chief with activating the forerunner technology. Maybe a new combat skin for Chief and means for Halsey to fight the new threats ? Why else would they emphasize Lasky’s comment ‘‘until we find a way how’’ I think Halsey is how and Chief the way.

Also when Halsey told Lasky: I told you my position 3 weeks ago , i told you this was happening. And Lasky replying ‘‘let’s talk in private’’. And Buck commenting ‘‘What’s that about’’ and the zoom in on that scene as if something else is going on. I doubt they’d just use that scene for no apparent reason.

> 2533274861192818;7:
> > 2533274820230754;6:
> > I just thought of something today. Is it actually possible for Chief to have Bornstellar’s geas? It is speculated that Bornstellar is still alive and he contained himself in a Cryptum or a stasis bubble so he didn’t die of old age. Even if this isn’t true and he is dead, wouldn’t the Librarian have had to use the Composer to extract his essence?
>
>
> Forerunners don’t die because of age bruh.

Oh I thought they did, is it mentioned anywhere about that? Looked on halowiki and halopedia and found nothing.

Chief has didact imprent. Halsey has librarian. Cortona is made from Halsey confusing the domain. Telling cortona now has to uphold the mantle .

In fact, I don’t even think you need the Composer to create a geas do you?

> 2533274809377410;16:
> Chief has didact imprent. Halsey has librarian. Cortona is made from Halsey confusing the domain. Telling cortona now has to uphold the mantle .

Cortona vs Bornsteller

> 2533274861192818;11:
> > 2533274812652989;8:
> > > 2533274843069928;3:
> > > > 2533274805913959;2:
> > > > I thought that too… But Warrior Servant could just be the forerunner term for a soldier. As well as a caste in forerunner society.
> > >
> > >
> > > Indeed, but then there’s the question of why would he call Chief that, there is no other underlining reason for him to do so
> >
> >
> > Because that is the terminology familiar to the Warden. The Didact called Cortana an ancilla after all despite her not being a Forerunner AI.
>
>
> But the Didact called Chief simply warrior, not Warrior-Servant.

He never referred to any other human as a Warrior-Servant either, even to the Lord of Admirals in the books. The Warden is an AI. Forerunner AIs use a lot of Forerunner terms for things, like combat skins, ancillas, etc.

Then there was that one line in Halo 3 when guilty spark says “You are forerunner”.