Seriously the biggest damn flaw about sprint besides it artificially increasing map size is that you get stuck in run or walk situations. I don’t care about fake strategems involving the choice of risking openly sprinting or taking your time and keeping your wep raised. It comes down to luck and chance.
I want sprint gone. Of course. But there is no reason they won’t allow the community to test the game in multiple ways. What are they afraid of?
Let us test Halo 5 one week without sprint. Let us test one week with it the way 343 likes it. THEN let us test sprint like so:
- Limited sprint time not unlimited.
- Weapon raised, you can shoot, no accuracy debuff. (there’s already low aim assist in h5)
- you CAN zoom
- you can throw grenades
Basically just turn sprint into a temporary speed boost for all players without ruining the other aspects of the game. The turning being less responsive can stay in of course since it provides feedback and is a balancer to faster forward mobility.
If we can shoot while boosting we should be able to sprint while shooting too. After all pro sprint/boost players often state how they’re balanced by being a talent all players can call upon. So everyone being able to sprint and shoot is just as balanced by that logic. And it keeps the premise of always having your gun ready for an encounter.
Would I prefer no sprint especially with boost taking front stage as mobility enhancer instead? Yes. But I want to at least find a much better way to impliment sprint or speed increases in general if we must have it.
TL;DR: Read the damn OP you lazy child.
What do you think? I personally think they’re wasting the full potential of such an early beta. There could be polls on whether you like certain play styles or not or which you like best.
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please refrain from making non-constructive posts.</mark>*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2533274813583846;1:
> Seriously the biggest damn flaw about sprint besides it artificially increasing map size is that you get stuck in run or walk situations. I don’t care about fake strategems involving the choice of risking openly sprinting or taking your time and keeping your wep raised. It comes down to luck and chance.
>
> I want sprint gone. Of course. But there is no reason they won’t allow the community to test the game in multiple ways. What are they afraid of?
>
> Let us test Halo 5 one week without sprint. Let us test one week with it the way 343 likes it. THEN let us test sprint like so:
> - Limited sprint time not unlimited.
> - Weapon raised, you can shoot, no accuracy debuff. (there’s already low aim assist in h5)
> - you CAN zoom
> - you can throw grenades
>
> Basically just turn sprint into a temporary speed boost for all players without ruining the other aspects of the game. The turning being less responsive can stay in of course since it provides feedback and is a balancer to faster forward mobility.
> If we can shoot while boosting we should be able to sprint while shooting too. After all pro sprint/boost players often state how they’re balanced by being a talent all players can call upon. So everyone being able to sprint and shoot is just as balanced by that logic. And it keeps the premise of always having your gun ready for an encounter.
>
> Would I prefer no sprint especially with boost taking front stage as mobility enhancer instead? Yes. But I want to at least find a much better way to impliment sprint or speed increases in general if we must have it.
>
> TL;DR: Read the damn OP you lazy child.
> What do you think? I personally think they’re wasting the full potential of such an early beta. There could be polls on whether you like certain play styles or not or which you like best.
Reported for trolling.
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2533274807881873;2:
> > 2533274813583846;1:
> > Seriously the biggest damn flaw about sprint besides it artificially increasing map size is that you get stuck in run or walk situations. I don’t care about fake strategems involving the choice of risking openly sprinting or taking your time and keeping your wep raised. It comes down to luck and chance.
> >
> > I want sprint gone. Of course. But there is no reason they won’t allow the community to test the game in multiple ways. What are they afraid of?
> >
> > Let us test Halo 5 one week without sprint. Let us test one week with it the way 343 likes it. THEN let us test sprint like so:
> > - Limited sprint time not unlimited.
> > - Weapon raised, you can shoot, no accuracy debuff. (there’s already low aim assist in h5)
> > - you CAN zoom
> > - you can throw grenades
> >
> > Basically just turn sprint into a temporary speed boost for all players without ruining the other aspects of the game. The turning being less responsive can stay in of course since it provides feedback and is a balancer to faster forward mobility.
> > If we can shoot while boosting we should be able to sprint while shooting too. After all pro sprint/boost players often state how they’re balanced by being a talent all players can call upon. So everyone being able to sprint and shoot is just as balanced by that logic. And it keeps the premise of always having your gun ready for an encounter.
> >
> > Would I prefer no sprint especially with boost taking front stage as mobility enhancer instead? Yes. But I want to at least find a much better way to impliment sprint or speed increases in general if we must have it.
> >
> > TL;DR: Read the damn OP you lazy child.
> > What do you think? I personally think they’re wasting the full potential of such an early beta. There could be polls on whether you like certain play styles or not or which you like best.
>
>
>
> Reported for trolling.
Reported for being a nitwit.
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please refrain from making non-constructive posts.</mark>*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2533274940918627;3:
> > 2533274807881873;2:
> > > 2533274813583846;1:
> > > Seriously the biggest damn flaw about sprint besides it artificially increasing map size is that you get stuck in run or walk situations. I don’t care about fake strategems involving the choice of risking openly sprinting or taking your time and keeping your wep raised. It comes down to luck and chance.
> > >
> > > I want sprint gone. Of course. But there is no reason they won’t allow the community to test the game in multiple ways. What are they afraid of?
> > >
> > > Let us test Halo 5 one week without sprint. Let us test one week with it the way 343 likes it. THEN let us test sprint like so:
> > > - Limited sprint time not unlimited.
> > > - Weapon raised, you can shoot, no accuracy debuff. (there’s already low aim assist in h5)
> > > - you CAN zoom
> > > - you can throw grenades
> > >
> > > Basically just turn sprint into a temporary speed boost for all players without ruining the other aspects of the game. The turning being less responsive can stay in of course since it provides feedback and is a balancer to faster forward mobility.
> > > If we can shoot while boosting we should be able to sprint while shooting too. After all pro sprint/boost players often state how they’re balanced by being a talent all players can call upon. So everyone being able to sprint and shoot is just as balanced by that logic. And it keeps the premise of always having your gun ready for an encounter.
> > >
> > > Would I prefer no sprint especially with boost taking front stage as mobility enhancer instead? Yes. But I want to at least find a much better way to impliment sprint or speed increases in general if we must have it.
> > >
> > > TL;DR: Read the damn OP you lazy child.
> > > What do you think? I personally think they’re wasting the full potential of such an early beta. There could be polls on whether you like certain play styles or not or which you like best.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Reported for trolling.
>
>
>
> Reported for being a nitwit.
Reported for making non-constructive posts.
I think it’s worth a try. I still say we try the current, bloated maps with maybe 125% movement speed and no sprint. If that works, maybe start designing maps intended for no sprint in the first place…
All this reporting and for what? Grow up children. The point of this beta and this forum is to post meaningful feedback. Let the OP have his opinion and provide meaningful feedback for it, which he did. That’s the whole point of the beta and for those that can’t grasp the English language or put together a useful sentence you shouldn’t be in the beta in the first place.
I’ve personally enjoyed this beta so far. It shows great promise for a game around a year away from release. The fine details…I’m going to play a little more to give my opinion on those. Definitely room for improvement in certain areas but so far it feels really good to play and that’s the point of this right gamers?
> 2533274913448583;5:
> I think it’s worth a try. I still say we try the current, bloated maps with maybe 125% movement speed and no sprint. If that works, maybe start designing maps intended for no sprint in the first place…
Thanks for the normal post. And I agree.