What’s the point of having all those map and gametype variations if only two will win the voting? I have only played one objective game in Halo 2 Classic, almost every one of them Slayer on Beaver Creek, with the occasional Ivory Tower sprinkled in. I feel we’re missing out by not being able to play the occasional 1 Flag Fast on Lockout or Single Bomb on Zanzibar.
Cliffnotes: Not a fan of the voting system, institute a system like Halo 2 or Halo 3 had. Pull a game and map combination from a pool based on weighing in the playlist.
I MUCH prefer voting than having to be forced to play one choice or veto it for another seemingly random choice. No thanks.
yeah cant get rid of the vote system with so many mp maps, what would be good is if they implement a feature cod used once before
Disable / Block voting of the last played match or two, this way you get more of a selection / variety of maps
I agree. Can only take so much mindless slayer.
Voting is an excellent concept, on paper. In its execution, it leads to no variety. It would help if H2C were divided into Skirmish and Slayer playlists. It just gets so dull playing Slayer on the same two or three maps when you finally get into a game. I had this same issue with Halo 4, everyone instantly voting for Haven in every playlist.
To me, it’s an annoyance. I doubt any of us will be around to see Relic or Zanzibar 1 Flag, Colossus Snipers, or Ivory Tower Single Bomb. The system definitely needs improvement.
edit:blame the community imo
Agree. I love lock and middy but damn something different would be fun. But this is also why headlong, terminal ,and relic should be in the4v4 list because people would pick them
For mixed playlists I think a good idea would be to leave voting in, but once you play a certain gamemode and map, that gamemode and map are both locked so there’s more variety.
Voting isn’t the problem. The godawful playlists are the problem.
That is also true, Rayz The Party.