See what I did there? Troll title but serious OP?
I was looking at the Warzone which is where my interest is in Halo 5 at the moment. But all around I’m seeing it instantly being compared to Titanfall and Advanced Warfare. This is one of the reason I left Halo with MCC and the community itself. It’s starting to become a trend to judge and entire game, just from one gamemode. If you look at Warzone, its basically the child of Invasion and Firefight which is pretty much the best combo of any mode I’ve seen in Halo. The Req cards, yeah that might be from Titanfall, but yet look at Titanfalls success, and look at Halo’s. Take one feature, put in into Halo and improve it, and that one feature might change a gamemode for the better. Besides the fact, that feature could be exclusive only to Warzone, not BTB or any other gamemode. We’ve already seen War Games and improvements to that with Halo 5.
So why did I change my mind about Halo 5 when I came to dislike MCC? Because I wanted to see Halo in a new light and how it would be. I’ve always wanted that, always brainstormed it. With Halo 5, I’m seeing that. How competitive Halo 5 really can be, and how certain Spartan Abilities really can give Halo a new and fresh competitive edge. I always look at games like COD, seeing every game being basically the same. Black Ops 3 being LITERALLY the same damn thing as Advanced Warfare? CS: GO always looking the same, and I wonder why people always want that and that is because those communities are different. Those communities are used to seeing the same thing. They are used to playing those games the same way. But that’s not how Halo is and it’s also where unlike those communities, theres a divide in the Halo community. But it hasn’t really started with Halo 2 or Halo 3. Really it started with Reach and further when Bungie passed on Halo to 343. In the Halo community now. theres old fans that were with Bungie like myself, that also respect 343 very much or very little. Then theres the new fans that are loyal to 343. Theres people that are too used to how the old Halo games played and want Halo 5 to be just like that. Though that’s not how Halo has ever been. It’s never been like CS: GO or COD. It’s always changing, and it’s going to change whether you or me like it or not. You speak with your voice or your wallet, or even your interest in Halo. The old Halo is not coming back fully, it never will come back fully. The spirit of old Halo is still there, though it’s being reborn into something new, and possibly exciting. Halo 5, and Halo 4 won’t ever change the way the old Halo’s played, not even Reach. But that Era, that’s in the past and it’s not coming anytime soon into the future because that’s not what Halo is. That Era of gameplay, it’s not enough, and yeah it can be changed into something good and I do believe that is with Halo 5 and why? If Halo 5 was Halo 4, then honestly I think it would have sold more. The Spartan Abilities, are very much more balanced and are actually more interesting then Halo 4’s AA’s. Then I see, a post on Facebook about Halo 5’s beta being compared to Halo 3 with player counts and stuff and I’m thinking…just why? Why compare old to new? What sense does it make? Has Halo changed completely from the old? It has and people judge Halo’s all the time, every Halo has been judged. But perhaps a new face is what Halo is going to have, and from the looks of Halo 5, it already does. Will it test 343, and will it test Halo’s sucess in this generations world, but of course. Will it change viewpoints on Halo all around, but of course. However in the end…
Perhaps this is something Halo does need and perhaps this is a new perspective that Halo can be viewed from.



