> 2533274874014416;1:
> As we’ve already seen the updates keep getting better and more in the correct direction, I would wish for the Hayabusa armor in a coming update.
>
> Late to ask, but I would seriously love a Hayabusa/Katana make in Halo 5.
>
> What armors do you still want in Halo 5?
The rights to hayabusa are owned by team ninja it isn’t going to happen.
> 2533274874014416;1:
> As we’ve already seen the updates keep getting better and more in the correct direction, I would wish for the Hayabusa armor in a coming update.
>
> Late to ask, but I would seriously love a Hayabusa/Katana make in Halo 5.
>
> What armors do you still want in Halo 5?
Hayabusa will NEVER happen in Halo again, save for MAYBE H3A, but other than that another comapny owns the rights to Hayabusa and the armor set from Halo as well, Bungie had a deal with them, 343 does not.
> 2535429593088083;5:
> Hayabusa is awesome and all, although the publisher of Ninja Gaiden (Team Ninja) owns all rights to the armor itself.
I don’t see why 343 doesn’t ask if they can use it again, then if they get yes, we get the armour. If they get a no, then they should let us know so we’ll stop asking
> 2533274857165616;6:
> > 2535429593088083;5:
> > Hayabusa is awesome and all, although the publisher of Ninja Gaiden (Team Ninja) owns all rights to the armor itself.
>
> I don’t see why 343 doesn’t ask if they can use it again, then if they get yes, we get the armour. If they get a no, then they should let us know so we’ll stop asking
Because they would have to pay for it. I’m not super familiar with Team Ninja, but I don’t ever hear of high demand for Nicole-458, so a trade isn’t going to happen. It doesnt make sense for 343 to pay thousands of dollars in licensing for one armor, when they can make a few dozen for the same price. I loved Hayabusa in H3. But it isn’t coming back. Side note, do remasters legally count as different games, because MCC has Hayabusa.
> 2533274832089275;7:
> > 2533274857165616;6:
> > > 2535429593088083;5:
> > > Hayabusa is awesome and all, although the publisher of Ninja Gaiden (Team Ninja) owns all rights to the armor itself.
> >
> > I don’t see why 343 doesn’t ask if they can use it again, then if they get yes, we get the armour. If they get a no, then they should let us know so we’ll stop asking
>
> Because they would have to pay for it. I’m not super familiar with Team Ninja, but I don’t ever hear of high demand for Nicole-458, so a trade isn’t going to happen. It doesnt make sense for 343 to pay thousands of dollars in licensing for one armor, when they can make a few dozen for the same price. I loved Hayabusa in H3. But it isn’t coming back. Side note, do remasters legally count as different games, because MCC has Hayabusa.
Fair enough there really and remasters don’t count because it’s a remaster not a remake
> 2533274857165616;14:
> > 2533274832089275;7:
> > > 2533274857165616;6:
> > > > 2535429593088083;5:
> > > > Hayabusa is awesome and all, although the publisher of Ninja Gaiden (Team Ninja) owns all rights to the armor itself.
> > >
> > > I don’t see why 343 doesn’t ask if they can use it again, then if they get yes, we get the armour. If they get a no, then they should let us know so we’ll stop asking
> >
> > Because they would have to pay for it. I’m not super familiar with Team Ninja, but I don’t ever hear of high demand for Nicole-458, so a trade isn’t going to happen. It doesnt make sense for 343 to pay thousands of dollars in licensing for one armor, when they can make a few dozen for the same price. I loved Hayabusa in H3. But it isn’t coming back. Side note, do remasters legally count as different games, because MCC has Hayabusa.
>
> Fair enough there really and remasters don’t count because it’s a remaster not a remake
I was just curious because MCC may legally count as a different game than the individual games. Although Movies get remastered and they probably don’t have to pay for the rights to the music again
> 2533274832089275;15:
> > 2533274857165616;14:
> > > 2533274832089275;7:
> > > > 2533274857165616;6:
> > > > > 2535429593088083;5:
> > > > > Hayabusa is awesome and all, although the publisher of Ninja Gaiden (Team Ninja) owns all rights to the armor itself.
> > > >
> > > > I don’t see why 343 doesn’t ask if they can use it again, then if they get yes, we get the armour. If they get a no, then they should let us know so we’ll stop asking
> > >
> > > Because they would have to pay for it. I’m not super familiar with Team Ninja, but I don’t ever hear of high demand for Nicole-458, so a trade isn’t going to happen. It doesnt make sense for 343 to pay thousands of dollars in licensing for one armor, when they can make a few dozen for the same price. I loved Hayabusa in H3. But it isn’t coming back. Side note, do remasters legally count as different games, because MCC has Hayabusa.
> >
> > Fair enough there really and remasters don’t count because it’s a remaster not a remake
>
> I was just curious because MCC may legally count as a different game than the individual games. Although Movies get remastered and they probably don’t have to pay for the rights to the music again
Nah because it’s using the exact same assets with just a fancy graphical update there’s nothing entirely new since they legally own that version but if they were to recreate the asset for another game then it would be a remake and no longer a remaster. I think thats how it works I’m not sure but it makes sense