I hate that in games like Halo 5 or TMCC you cannot decide the map because you can play 3 times the same map and you cant do anything, for example some community maps are trash because of the spawns are literally in front of the enemy. Then if 343 add the option, the players would like to play in their favorite maps.
What do you think???
Mcc had map selection at first and all that ever got picked was halo 3 on the same four maps. I like being able to try all the maps, and as long as you don’t exit after each match you should get a different map each time, but if you really want a say on the map you play a veto system might work better.
If players could choose to play their favorite maps over and over again, do you not see that you’d be in much the same situation you’re complaining about now? But I suppose if it’s your personal favorite map that’s played over and over again, you wouldn’t have much of a problem with that.
The veto system was one of the best things OG Halo 3 had.
It can also be used as a source of providing feedback.
343 can pull statistics of the most commonly vetoed maps and see what they can do to improve upon them.
I’m sure not many of us wants to play slayer on white cell or mercy.
> 2535457204111741;4:
> The veto system was one of the best things OG Halo 3 had.
> It can also be used as a source of providing feedback.
>
> 343 can pull statistics of the most commonly vetoed maps and see what they can do to improve upon them.
> I’m sure not many of us wants to play slayer on white cell or mercy.
I can tell you right now that if a veto system were introduce, none of the forge maps would be picked except maybe Refuge.