BR, DMR, and so called "popular majority"

Originally Posted by: PURE HALO 95 Go to Quoted Post

The BR is niw a 5-shot kill.
Burst is the same as far as I know.
BR is bad at long range.

DMR is bad at close range.

Weapon sandbox is being majorly expanded.

Everything you said has already come true…

Originally Posted by: DBD Shadow LK Go to Quoted Post

We have no confirmation on that. It SHOULD be, but honestly it could be good at close range - long range if your good enough.

The BR will only be good from close-medium range, so It definitely should be a 4-shot weapon. If I had to balance the two, I’d put the BR back to 4-shot, with the same fire rate it has now from the videos. The DMR would stay 5-shot, but it would clearly wreck at long-ranges, but then lose to the BR at close range. The medium range will be all up to the player’s skill, because the BR could EASILY miss one shot, which would make it on par with the DMR.

With saying that, I do not know the fire rate of the DMR, but if I could chose something for it to compare to, it’d be the fire rate of the Halo 3 BR. A bit slower than the Halo 4 BR fire rate but still pretty good.

If that were the actual fire rate of the DMR in Halo 4, then I’m pretty sure that the BR being 4-shot, and the DMR being 5-shot would be perfect in Halo 4 to balance those weapons. Assuming they still have the same range as in Halo:Reach, and Halo 3.

I honestly have no clue why the BR would stay 5-shot. You can so easily miss that one shot, and then it becomes a 6-shot weapon, making it less useful than the DMR, a single-shot weapon that can easily hit it’s target because only one bullet is needed to hit the target, not all three.

I don’t know if I’m wrong or right, but I REALLY hate the BR being 5-shot. It just kills me to think that my favourite gun from the series won’t be back to the glory I was alluded to when I heard it was coming back. The signature “4-shot kill” will become “5-shot”, which I know isn’t very liked by a LOT of players.

When you play with the Halo 2 BR, you never go back.

EDIT: Just wondering from that poll, the people who said keep the BR the way it is. Do you guys mean keep it like it’s been seen in Halo 4, being 5-shot with faster fire rate? Or do you mean like it was in Halo 2/3, being a 4-shot with a little bit faster fire rate in Halo 2 than Halo 3?

Just wondering, because I hope you guys don’t think that the BR is 5-shot. Preposterous.

Response from XRounX:

Once again, this -Yoink!- server deleted my lengthy response to this post before it was submitted, so im going to try again…

I see your point on how the BR and DMR can be better balanced in that way, my big fear about that is that people will figure out how to make the BR work at any range and keep the trend of one super weapon only going…

My big stance on everything, the reason for this thread, is that I am sick and tired of seeing the same old thing, one weapon is perfect, no other weapon other than power weapons can compete, so thats the only weapon that ever gets used, it was that way in halo2, then in halo3, then in Reach, but at least in Reach the DMR was actually accurate so people like me who cant do marksmanship as well as everyone else actually had a chance of fighting on an even field.

What I have always wanted is freedom of choice, im so sick of one weapon being better than everything else, if you had categories of weapons that did selective things and only those selective things then each category is powerful in its own right. Marksmanship weapons like the BR, DMR, Sniper, are all naturally powerful at range, thats how they are designed, while AR, SMG, Plasma weapons and so on are semi-full auto weapons that are more practical at close range but suffer more at long range, while of course you would have weapons that bleed thru and make odd exceptions, like the carbine/needle rifles.

Each weapon, and category of weapons is designed to operate a certain way, hopefully in a unique capacity, so that every weapon is valuable in its own way, under its own conditions, and different weapons expose weaknesses of other weapons, and so on.

Long winded yes, but this is a big deal and it needs to be addressed in its fullest.

If things continue the way they have been for the last decade, then 343 will have failed in every respect, especially with examples like Bungie allowing MLG (Moronic Lame-brain Game-breakers) to decide what was considered “pro” effectively stripping the game down to your choice of DMR, DMR, or DMR as your weapon, and your choice of Sprint, Sprint, or Sprint, as your armor ability, basically flushed any concept of real skill, creativity and frankly competitive spirit out of the game.

The whole concept of “skill” and competition is setting up the basic goals of the game of what it takes to win, then leaving the gate wide open for people to explore HOW, to win the game.

If people can sit here and honestly tell me that the contest of skill is limited to the selective first choice favorite of anyone, and not left open to the individual spirit and the collective of everyone who plays, then they are the biggest bigots who have ever lived.

To tell people that, in order for you to be good at something, in order for you to win, you MUST do everything the way we do, and if you even think about doing things differently you are condemned to the fate of being a noob moron loser, every insult under the sun belittling someone into little more than a pile of pissed on dust, what makes it any different than racism, religious, or any other kind of bigotry.

The back bone of skill is the sportsmanship spirit of fair play and unhindered creativity, is it not?

I approach this whole issue with the American spirit, freedom and equality for all, not all rights reserved by royalty, or some “social elite” everyone is equal, we all have a fair say in this game.

I take it all very personally because I have mental and physical problems with playing a marksmanship role, I am left handed, so all the major dexterity is in my left thumb, on top of that, I stabbed myself to the bone in my right hand near my thumb, while I havent loss any noticeable use with my hand it still feels odd. Then theres something in by brain that cant manage stress when im in a tense situation trying to do something very exact, especially when all the -Yoink!- holes keep jumping up and down throwing my shots off.

I can do just about everything, I can make myself focus with the DMR to get those shots in when they count, but my real strength is in tactics and planning, I can learn how people think, the way they do things, and alter the way I play to knock them off balance, its all about behavior.

I cant be the only one, I cant be the only person who has some kind of problem with playing a certain way, but instead of being a petty vindictive bigot like all the -Yoink!- holes on xbox live, im not calling for the ban of anything, I simply want the freedom to play the way I play best, if me lots of options and choices to work with, let me find a way of beating the “popular” strategy, so that they would in turn need to find a way of beating mine, and round and round it goes, everyone finding new ways of doing things constantly evolving the gameplay, not bigotive, not selfish, petty, controlling, vindictive, forcing people to be something they are not…

Thats my stance, and im sticking to it.

> If things continue the way they have been for the last decade, then 343 will have failed in every respect, especially with examples like Bungie allowing MLG (Moronic Lame-brain Game-breakers) to decide what was considered “pro” effectively stripping the game down to your choice of DMR, DMR, or DMR as your weapon, and your choice of Sprint, Sprint, or Sprint, as your armor ability, basically flushed any concept of real skill, creativity and frankly competitive spirit out of the game.
>
>
> quote]
>
> Why are you bashing on MLG. They have 1 playlist among 25 playlist. MLG never dictated what the settings were in Reach just their own playlist. Don’t like MLG then don’t play it.
>
> I understand you just want a more balanced sandbox and I’m cool with that. But trying to rip on a whole community because you simply don’t like their settings is a bit childish.
>
> As far as your topic as a whole I can agree that the sandbox needs a little more balance. I personally think the BR should be 4 shot not for nostaglia reasons, but for balancing issues. The DMR can fire faster than the BR and even though bloom is implemented so that the BR should win at a closer range. If used right the DMR will win both medium and long range engagements. Thats really the only issue I see between the two weapons.
>
> Alas I have not played the game so I can speak on the accuracy of my statement, so until release it’s just conjecture. Hoping for a fair balanced game. 343i make it happen.

I’m having a difficult time trying to figure out what you’re trying to say.

Ya its hard to follow some of your ideas because a few sentences make no sense. And you hatred towards mlg just shows your ignorance in what mlg was trying to accomplish with their settings.

Hmmm the OPs post could be structured much better. I see a lot of quoted posts by other users but this just makes the thread longer than it needs to be and it’s just going to confuse people who read through quickly.

> > If things continue the way they have been for the last decade, then 343 will have failed in every respect, especially with examples like Bungie allowing MLG (Moronic Lame-brain Game-breakers) to decide what was considered “pro” effectively stripping the game down to your choice of DMR, DMR, or DMR as your weapon, and your choice of Sprint, Sprint, or Sprint, as your armor ability, basically flushed any concept of real skill, creativity and frankly competitive spirit out of the game.
> >
> >
> > quote]
> >
> > Why are you bashing on MLG. They have 1 playlist among 25 playlist. MLG never dictated what the settings were in Reach just their own playlist. Don’t like MLG then don’t play it.
> >
> > I understand you just want a more balanced sandbox and I’m cool with that. But trying to rip on a whole community because you simply don’t like their settings is a bit childish.
> >
> > As far as your topic as a whole I can agree that the sandbox needs a little more balance. I personally think the BR should be 4 shot not for nostaglia reasons, but for balancing issues. The DMR can fire faster than the BR and even though bloom is implemented so that the BR should win at a closer range. If used right the DMR will win both medium and long range engagements. Thats really the only issue I see between the two weapons.
> >
> > Alas I have not played the game so I can speak on the accuracy of my statement, so until release it’s just conjecture. Hoping for a fair balanced game. 343i make it happen.
>
> What im saying about MLG is that they were the first to be invited to the beta, they were basically given the first rights to judge the game, and unless im wrong, they were directly responsible for the “PRO” and other related game types where all armor abilities are removed, and you only get a choice of DMR and NR, which as I keep saying is not a contest of skill…

> Ya its hard to follow some of your ideas because a few sentences make no sense. And you hatred towards mlg just shows your ignorance in what mlg was trying to accomplish with their settings.

My hatred isnt just with MLG, its with all the other -Yoink!- fascist dictators who keep telling me that im not allowed to play to my strengths and abilities, that I have to play they way they play to be good…

The reason why some of what im saying doesnt make sense is because my brain works differently from yours, its practically trans-dimensional I see everything I want to say all at once as im saying it, as well as forwards backwards and everything else in between.

Imagine trying to focus on a detailed painting the size of your bedroom wall and and define all the little details of it verbally while remaining focused on the painting as a whole…

Thats why it gets garbled…

> Hmmm the OPs post could be structured much better. I see a lot of quoted posts by other users but this just makes the thread longer than it needs to be and it’s just going to confuse people who read through quickly.

True, but I needed those two posts for context, otherwise it wont make any sense…

You think those are not contests of skill? Really? Your making judgements based on how YOU play the game, and what YOUR skillset’s are. Imagine never.missing shots with the snipe or dmr in any situation. Now imagine things like camo ability, armorlock, the needler, and an assult rifle and how badly those elements slow the game down without adding any substance to gameplay. Mlg makes the most skillful settings that play the fastest. Period.

> > Ya its hard to follow some of your ideas because a few sentences make no sense. And you hatred towards mlg just shows your ignorance in what mlg was trying to accomplish with their settings.
>
> My hatred isnt just with MLG, its with all the other -Yoink!- fascist dictators who keep telling me that im not allowed to play to my strengths and abilities, that I have to play they way they play to be good…

You still dont get it. I would think someone with a trans-dimentional brian would undertand something so simple.

> > Ya its hard to follow some of your ideas because a few sentences make no sense. And you hatred towards mlg just shows your ignorance in what mlg was trying to accomplish with their settings.
>
> My hatred isnt just with MLG, its with all the other -Yoink!- fascist dictators who keep telling me that im not allowed to play to my strengths and abilities, that I have to play they way they play to be good…
>
> <mark>The reason why some of what im saying doesnt make sense is because my brain works differently from yours, its practically trans-dimensional I see everything I want to say all at once as im saying it, as well as forwards backwards and everything else in between.</mark>
>
> Imagine trying to focus on a detailed painting the size of your bedroom wall and and define all the little details of it verbally while remaining focused on the painting as a whole…
>
> Thats why it gets garbled…

what you just said…

> You think those are not contests of skill? Really? Your making judgements based on how YOU play the game, and what YOUR skillset’s are. Imagine never.missing shots with the snipe or dmr in any situation. Now imagine things like camo ability, armorlock, the needler, and an assult rifle and how badly those elements slow the game down without adding any substance to gameplay. Mlg makes the most skillful settings that play the fastest. Period.

In other words your a fascist who wont allow me, or anyone else to play the game, THE WHOLE GAME, the way we are as people. I cant imagine never missing with the sniper and DMR because its not my skillset, have you ever been in a situation where you have so much stress you have to walk away and stop playing? I had that a whole lot last year, and when I get back online and playing again, im sure it will continue to happen, because thats a weakness I have, which you can never understand because you have never been forced to operate for a position of weakness…

More to the point, the only rational that fascists like you can ever use to justify your racist bigotry, is speed… speed, speed, speed, like the speed of all the -Yoinks!- with swords sprinting into my face for free kills, thats what abilities like armorlock, jetpack, evade, are for, to give the rest of us that arent noobs the chance of fighting back.

I still dont understand how you people can horde all the power weapons as your first priority, the first thing you do when the game starts, and yell at people like me who want to have the choice of doing something different. How can you sit here and honestly tell me that there is something wrong with me, because I want to expose your obvious weaknesses and force you to search and expose mine, or lose…

The exact same damn thing you criticize me of…

“You think those are not contests of skill? Really? Your making judgements based on how YOU play the game, and what YOUR skillset’s are.”

Right back at you, the first thing to come out of your mouth is exactly what im saying, yet you keep trying to perpetuate the notion in the very next sentence. How Ironic…

Last but not least.

“Now imagine things like camo ability, armorlock, the needler, and an assult rifle and how badly those elements slow the game down without adding any substance to gameplay.”

The Irony never seems to end with you, as I keep saying boiling the game down to one thing and one thing only is the greatest damage that can be dealt to ‘substance’ in a game of contest.

What you have said is a flat out lie, you are biased to the core, you are unwilling to listen to reason, you are unwilling to let anyone be different, you, are a neo-fascist bigot, who hates freedom.

You simply will never allow anyone to have the freedom of choice, and so by the same right you should never be allowed to play the game the way you want it to be, the road goes both ways, either you allow freedom of choice, or you have all choice removed from your own life. By your own reasoning I should be allowed to make a custom game removing everything you like about the game, keeping and enhancing everything you hate, and force you to play that game til the day you die.

I dont beat around the bush, I dont do flimflam, its all honest to God truth, nothing more, nothing less, speak truth or get the hell out…

I agree on how that only having one so called “super weapon” that can rule the game and kill every other weapon in any environment takes the fun out of any game. It seems with modern games, mainly FPSs, the strategy is to use or rush to the super weapon and just kill, kill, and kill again, especially in MLG. With that happening it takes away the fun of adapting to beat the player. It is impossible with the exception of actually using that super weapon whether it be the BR or the DMR. Some people to respond to that would say if you can’t beat them, join them. I myself would hate to do that, it takes away the plotting , the making of plans, and adapting to what your enemy does which I love in a game.

> > > Ya its hard to follow some of your ideas because a few sentences make no sense. And you hatred towards mlg just shows your ignorance in what mlg was trying to accomplish with their settings.
> >
> > My hatred isnt just with MLG, its with all the other -Yoink!- fascist dictators who keep telling me that im not allowed to play to my strengths and abilities, that I have to play they way they play to be good…
> >
> > <mark>The reason why some of what im saying doesnt make sense is because my brain works differently from yours, its practically trans-dimensional I see everything I want to say all at once as im saying it, as well as forwards backwards and everything else in between.</mark>
> >
> > Imagine trying to focus on a detailed painting the size of your bedroom wall and and define all the little details of it verbally while remaining focused on the painting as a whole…
> >
> > Thats why it gets garbled…
>
> what you just said…

Ha Ha Ha, what the hell ever man, its all true…

Do you even know what facisism means? Mlg is 1 of 30 playlists… and the other 29 playlists all have relatvley the same settings. That long post you just made just confirms that you truely do not understand the game of halo. So the next time you rage quit do every one a favor and sell your copy of reach

Allow me to sneakingly note that I’ve seen this thread and won’t be ever coming back.

> I agree on how that only having one so called “super weapon” that can rule the game and kill every other weapon in any environment takes the fun out of any game. It seems with modern games, mainly FPSs, the strategy is to use or rush to the super weapon and just kill, kill, and kill again, especially in MLG. With that happening it takes away the fun of adapting to beat the player. It is impossible with the exception of actually using that super weapon whether it be the BR or the DMR. Some people to respond to that would say if you can’t beat them, join them. I myself would hate to do that, it takes away the plotting , the making of plans, and adapting to what your enemy does which I love in a game.

Exactly, in simplest terms I skull–Yoink- people, thats how I when, I might spend the first third of the game just figuring the person out, then when I see what they like to do over and over, I plan on how to take them off balance.

Adding armor abilities to the game makes that much more possible, the number one thing that people love to do it seems, is the rush into your face and beat you down for a free kill, which is why I use armorlock more often than not. Armorlock is so good for equalizing the battlefield, if the person your fighting is a rocket -Yoink!-, grenade -Yoink!-, sword -Yoink!-, what ever kind of -Yoink!-, the armorlock allows you to negate that instant death and free kill so they actually have to try and fight, not to mention it operates as a weapon on its own when people rush in to give you a kiss…

And so when people do stuff like that, the little noobs do nothing but cry about how gay it is and how it should be removed from the game. Instead, maybe they should stop crying like entitlement brats and change the way they do things, its as though these people can never be happy unless everything is just given to them on a platter…

The fact of the matter is that I have found there kryptonite, and I keep ramming it deep into there chests, if they ever expect to win a real game against me, they first have to stop doing things the same way every time like a crazy person, then look at who I am and what im doing that knocks them off there rocker…

(difinition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result)

Note: for all the noobs who want to instantly flame on this, armorlock, unlike power weapons, is not perfect, it has very real flaws that I for one have mastered, I know exactly how to attack people who use armorlock and I rarely ever lose in AL vs AL fights, dont complain, innovate…

> Do you even know what facisism means? Mlg is 1 of 30 playlists… and the other 29 playlists all have relatvley the same settings. That long post you just made just confirms that you truely do not understand the game of halo. So the next time you rage quit do every one a favor and sell your copy of reach

Ok, I need to explain, I havent been able to play for the past year, so I dont know what all has changed, I now live off grid, out in the middle of nowhere and plan to be using a friends connection to finally come back in about a week.

More to the point, this is a concern for halo 4 I want it to be better than this… I want it to rise above the garbage of the past, dont let ignorance guide your reasoning…

BTW OP, the first paragraph was not from me; it was the second one from me.

I would never in my life say anything about keeping the BR 5-shot, and I could care less about the sandbox being expanded.

> BTW OP, the first paragraph was not from me; it was the second one from me.
>
> I would never in my life say anything about keeping the BR 5-shot, and I could care less about the sandbox being expanded.

Ok, thanks for clearing that up.

Care to comment on my response?