Do you think Halo 4 will be using a Fixed version of the BPR we see today on Waypoint
Its kind of 1-100 style
Maybe different BPR’S for different playlists
So thoughts
Do you think Halo 4 will be using a Fixed version of the BPR we see today on Waypoint
Its kind of 1-100 style
Maybe different BPR’S for different playlists
So thoughts
I can’t see that as the new 1-50 in Halo 4 be like BPR. while skill does have place in BPR, it just doesn’t do as good as a job as 1-50 did.
I hope not, BPR doesn’t show skill. It doesn’t account for different playlists.
ie: someone who only plays social and has 2 kd = 100bpr
ie: someone who only plays mlg and has 1.4 kd = 80 bpr
Maybe it could use both kinds: 1 for Slayer and 1 for Objective?
It could work, but it needs to be tweaked a bit. And I’m still not a fan of a capped skill system. It’s the end that gets people hyped. 
BPR doesn`t scale when you play more difficult opponents.
It`s useless.
I agree that BPR is completely useless. it has nothing to do with skill and can be boosted too easily.
Halo 4 has a progression system like reach and then you go into specializations please keep up to date with the info
I really hope not. Based on BPR, I’m rated worse than my friend who’s played 11 games of matchmaking and has 10 kills…
why won’t 343 repent and give the true visible ranking system most players want?
> why won’t 343 repent and give the true visible ranking system most players want?
Because it’s a wildly broken system that resulted in loads of second accounts and spammers trying to sell accounts (and selling your gamertag is against the XBL Code of Conduct).
Specifically this:
Don’t lend, transfer, sell, or otherwise provide access to your account to any individual.
Don’t use your account for commercial purposes (including, without limitation, trading services or in-game content for currency or Microsoft Points).
> Halo 4 has a progression system like reach and then you go into specializations please keep up to date with the info
Social Rank = progression system
Ranked playlists = ???