Recently I have noticed that a lot has happened to starting decks… was this intended?
JUST WOW! 
Yes and some of the new starting armys are quite overwelming if you asked me.
> 2535466433512301;1:
> Recently I have noticed that a lot has happened to starting decks… was this intended?
>
> JUST WOW!
Since when?
I guess its changed since today…
Has to be a bug, some armies have ironclad wraiths or lockdown scorpions, others have one engineer or one wolverine
> 2535472977547652;5:
> Has to be a bug, some armies have ironclad wraiths or lockdown scorpions, others have one engineer or one wolverine
Colony has bow 2 Scarred Hunters (each 100 energy) and 1 engineer… in the menu it just shows the engineer… somehow a bit bugged… you have to test the starting decks to really be able to assess them… very weird, since no word ever mentioned any changes in these starting units.
It has to be a bug. Kinsano’s Inferno starting starting army shows no units in most menus but when you click Deck Stats it shows Atriox’s second army: 2 grunts, a ranger, an ironclad hunter, and ironclad wraith. Something is definitely wrong here.
Maybe you are right about colony but I actually saw somebody start with one wolverine on my team I didn’t notice which leader. I wouldn’t mind switching to better starting units since anything you spawn dominates level 0 units I guess, blitz needs a 2nd map more than it needs anything else
> 2535472977547652;8:
> Maybe you are right about colony but I actually saw somebody start with one wolverine on my team I didn’t notice which leader. I wouldn’t mind switching to better starting units since anything you spawn dominates level 0 units I guess, blitz needs a 2nd map more than it needs anything else
We’ve been asking for new maps for awhile now.
> 2535466433512301;1:
> Recently I have noticed that a lot has happened to starting decks… was this intended?
>
> JUST WOW!
Hmm just had an out of sync game count as a loss. Just when records were fixed looks like a new issue popped up.
They changed it back to the way it was before 
I never got to test out starting units
All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
> 2533274969455749;12:
> All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
Yeah, but why? Why was it changed? Someone told me it was bugs in the game but I’m pretty sure that sort of thing would have to be intentional wouldn’t it?
> 2533274808981819;13:
> > 2533274969455749;12:
> > All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
>
> Yeah, but why? Why was it changed? Someone told me it was bugs in the game but I’m pretty sure that sort of thing would have to be intentional wouldn’t it?
What if they’re currently looking to change a lot of the starting units to make other leaders more viable? Perhaps an unfinished build was pushed out by accident.
> 2533274814970819;14:
> > 2533274808981819;13:
> > > 2533274969455749;12:
> > > All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
> >
> > Yeah, but why? Why was it changed? Someone told me it was bugs in the game but I’m pretty sure that sort of thing would have to be intentional wouldn’t it?
>
> What if they’re currently looking to change a lot of the starting units to make other leaders more viable? Perhaps an unfinished build was pushed out by accident.
My thoughts exactly. Those starting units were VERY specific but no one from 343 has said anything and it’s really -Yoink!- me off
> 2533274808981819;13:
> > 2533274969455749;12:
> > All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
>
> Yeah, but why? Why was it changed? Someone told me it was bugs in the game but I’m pretty sure that sort of thing would have to be intentional wouldn’t it?
I have no idea but it wasn’t a bug. It was a ‘error’ on 343 side. My guess was someone messed up and changed them before they were meant to. Having realised the error it was ordered to revert them back to the original starting armies.
> 2533274969455749;16:
> > 2533274808981819;13:
> > > 2533274969455749;12:
> > > All blitz starting armies have been reverted back to how they were.
> >
> > Yeah, but why? Why was it changed? Someone told me it was bugs in the game but I’m pretty sure that sort of thing would have to be intentional wouldn’t it?
>
> I have no idea but it wasn’t a bug. It was a ‘error’ on 343 side. My guess was someone messed up and changed them before they were meant to. Having realised the error it was ordered to revert them back to the original starting armies.
The changes were soooooooo good. I really hope they initiate it
What was Blitz again?
> 2533274904953177;18:
> What was Blitz again?
Said the guy with… ehhhh, 0 matches.
#ggz
Btw had you noticed that Shippy started with 2 cloaked marauders + cloaked reaver?
If this would stay we would have the new “We are Shipmaster, Resistance is futile”-Meta.
330 Energy-Starting Army, resulting on 165 Energy in return. No leader has a starting deck even close to this value.