Halo 4 should have a better betrayal system. It should be 3 strikes and you are out. And the system should boot you and not your teammates, because teammates are kicking the best player and realize then, that they kicked the best player.
Also, there should be a betrayal medal and ofcourse the person which betrays someone should get it, then you can see if somebody is a teamplayer or just a powerweapon camper.
EDIT: You should get banned from playing if you reach a critcical number for betraying others for over 30 minutes. It’s ridiculous in Reach, nobody cares…
> Halo 4 should have a better betrayal system. It should be 3 strikes and you are out. And the system should boot you and not your teammates, because teammates are kicking the best player and realize then, that they kicked the best player.
>
> Also, there should be a betrayal medal and ofcourse the person which betrays someone should get it, then you can see if somebody is a teamplayer or just a powerweapon camper.
I think 3 strikes is too many chances, but I can’t think of a good betrayal system :\
All this will do is influence immature kids to betray, just like the “yoink” medal in Reach gave people another reason to steal kills. Adding medals for showing immaturity in matchmaking isn’t going to lead the community in the right direction.
I’m almost positive 343 knows about the issue of betrayals.
What 343 needs to do is have a closed beta and pretty much mimic Diablo 3’s beta… I’m in the beta for Diablo 3 and they have been changing things non-stop. This same things needs to be done with Halo, they need to let the community play and give feedback on the systems and gameplay they have created.
343 has already shown us that they’re not afraid to make changes after the game comes out. When they implemented the Title Update i was really really impressed. Whatever system they choose for betrayals, if for some reason doesn’t work out at planned for them, and we the community express our opinion, i’m sure they would be willing to find an alternative whether it’s during the beta or after.
Lets just hope that if they do mimic Diablo 3 it doesn’t take 10 years to come out and maybe they could do an open beta too
> I’m almost positive 343 knows about the issue of betrayals.
>
> What 343 needs to do is have a closed beta and pretty much mimic Diablo 3’s beta… I’m in the beta for Diablo 3 and they have been changing things non-stop. This same things needs to be done with Halo, they need to let the community play and give feedback on the systems and gameplay they have created.
>
> 343 has already shown us that they’re not afraid to make changes after the game comes out. When they implemented the Title Update i was really really impressed. Whatever system they choose for betrayals, if for some reason doesn’t work out at planned for them, and we the community express our opinion, i’m sure they would be willing to find an alternative whether it’s during the beta or after.
>
> Lets just hope that if they do mimic Diablo 3 it doesn’t take 10 years to come out and maybe they could do an open beta too
Let’s be honest… TU is not that good, because you can spam trigger now even better. Nothing is better then the Halo 3 bullet spread…
And yes I agree with your points with the yoink medal. Okay maybe it shouldn’t have a betrayal medal, it should have a counter, how often you betrayed someone and every time you reached another 100 you should get banned for a good amount of time. The ban in Reach is ridiculous. You can’t take it serious.
I never said i liked or hated Title Update, what i mean is the fact that they even made a TU impressed me. They took a game that wasn’t there’s and they made a pretty decent change to it. It shows me they’re not afraid to do things like that, which makes me think if something in Halo 4 isn’t going as planned, they’ll change it rather than let it be.
and maybe they could do an open beta too