So I’ve been playing Blits for quite a while now, and in my experience, the covenant is better than the UNSC. The Blisterback seems to be better than the Kodiak when it comes to artillery and the Locust, for an anti-building, also seems to be a great unit that the UNSC has nothing to compare it to. Now I haven’t played the UNSC very much and maybe I just have a terrible deck for all my UNSC but does anyone else feel that they aren’t as great? Besides for the Condor, I like that more than the Scarab.
3 cyclops kill 1 locust ALONE.
Cyclop normal are 40 points = 120 points
locust =60 points
spartans 220/240 points the best way of kll that locust.
Banshed are cheap of play and dont need hero, just need locust + antin infantary to kill cyclops.
I find the Banished to be far superior in most ways. It’s odd.
Shipmaster is love, Shipmaster is life
> 2535433798140927;2:
> 3 cyclops kill 1 locust ALONE.
> Cyclop normal are 40 points = 120 points
> locust =60 points
>
> spartans 220/240 points the best way of kll that locust.
>
> Banshed are cheap of play and dont need hero, just need locust + antin infantary to kill cyclops.
Actually the base Locust is 40, the Siphon locust is 60, so it’s even cheaper.
I made a post about this, comparing the different price tiers for units, and explaining why I feel the Banished units are over all better. People said that I was using the UNSC wrong and that both factions are better in different situations. And while that is valid, I still don’t believe it’s perfectly balanced. Because one faction shouldn’t be far easier to use than the other.