> 2533274964860444;302:
> I feel that 343 should have told us that there was going to be a separate expansion not included in the Season Pass way before HW2 launch, it’s like being told by the teacher that you don’t have to study this particular topic but then a day before the exam he goes “Lol I forgot you do have to study that part, sorry about that!”
There is no test??
> 2533274837241440;320:
> > 2533274800596559;3:
> > I’m more surprised that people expected an entire expansion to be given away to them.
>
> Welcome to the Ark DLC expansion? Featuring new campaign missions aka one of the selling points of the season pass?
> Now they release a separate “Campaign DLC” not included in the season pass before the DLC I already paid for?
>
> I love that theres more content coming and I will pay for it but I still think its a sly move.
I’d say the campaign missions that are coming with the season pass will be out before ATN, it was massive mistake not to show them at E3 though.
I think that all this hate is dumb.
SP Holders got;
That is 7 leaders which together would of costed $35. How much did you pay for SP? $20 on ULT Edition, and $25 standard; that is a $15 save for many of us. Not to mention we are getting a mini-campaign which would probably be $5-$10 w/o the Season pass. We saved about $20-$25 on this game through the Season Pass, maybe even more.
The idea that blits also ruined you… That was your own damn fault. They didn’t ask you to buy these blits cards, and I never even fealt pressured to get them to win. I got so many packs that I felt fine with all I have and had no need to buy packs. BUYING BLITZ PACKS ARE YOUR OWN DOWNFALL, NOT 343I FAULT THAT YOU SPENT MORE THAN YOU NEEDED TO.
Lastly, how is paying $20 for a large campaign edition with cutscenes, along with a new gamemode, with a new enemy race, along with TWO new leaders a bad thing? It’s not, either pay the money or don’t, or you can spend $20 on a CoD DLC pack that gives you FOUR Multiplayer maps, see how far that gets you.
> 2533274927740213;304:
> > 2533274875084332;293:
> > > 2533274927740213;285:
> > > > 2533274870790671;280:
> > > > > 2533274875970588;278:
> > > > > > 2533274870790671;276:
> > > > > > > 2533274875970588;273:
> > > > > > > > 2533274870790671;271:
> > > > > > > > > 2533274875970588;268:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535470524887292;266:
> > > > > > > > > > I’m planning on purchasing the ATN expansion, but as someone who bought the ultimate edition of HW2, I do feel swindled. If they had given me the promised campaign expansion (my primary reason for buying the ultimate edition that includes the season pass) before announcing the ATN expansion I probably wouldn’t be as upset. But changing the description of the pass like they did and then announcing this so soon, before giving season pass owners their promised campaign expansion, was a cheap move, possibly even shady, and I completely understand why some people will not support 343 after this. I’m tempted to say the same, but I still enjoy Halo too much not to support 343. But in the future I will be warier of any season passes 343 has before deciding to purchase them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We’re still getting some campaign missions. I think the sales of HW2 were too low so they’re now charging for it to not go too negative.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > we get 2 missions
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wow such an amazing campaign
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note: “some campaign missions” I didn’t say it was a full campaign. ATN is not the season pass missions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yet it should be
> > > > >
> > > > > Why?? When you pay $60 for a full campaign. That’s a deal for $20 and more gamemodes, maps, and leaders.
> > > >
> > > > because the ultimate edition/season pass description had it in it
> > > >
> > > > i dont care about mp game modes [firefight seems to be mp only] and care very little about new leaders
> > > >
> > > > i got the ultimate edition just for the campaign
> > >
> > > I wouldn’t have gotten the ultimate edition then, would’ve been cheaper to just buy the DLC when it dropped.
> >
> > Yes but at the time no one knew a major campaign expansion would be sold seperately…that’s the problem. We didn’t have the information to make that decision you recommend.
>
> Fair enough. But still, if you only wanted a small portion of the DLC why purchase the season pass? That just sounds like a bad decision.
I’ll list this for the third time now in reply to you:
The season pass explicitly stated he would get the content that he wanted, for the price of the content individually. $20 for Ultimate Edition vs. $20 for ATN. The difference is he could buy them separately, or he could buy it in a bundle with a bunch of other stuff thrown in basically free. It really doesn’t sound like a bad decision at all and I’m not even remotely sure how one could even attempt to spin it that way.
I beg you to construct a logical argument as to why he should not have bought the Ultimate Edition for the same price as ATN DLC when it also said he would be getting the HW: DE, additional leaders, updates for more than six months and the expansion.
> 2533274958772240;323:
> I think that all this hate is dumb.
>
> SP Holders got;
> 1. Kinsano
> 2. Colony
> 3. Johnson
> 4. Jerome
> 5. Arbiter
> 6. Unnamed
> 7. Unnamed
>
> That is 7 leaders which together would of costed $35. How much did you pay for SP? $20 on ULT Edition, and $25 standard; that is a $15 save for many of us. Not to mention we are getting a mini-campaign which would probably be $5-$10 w/o the Season pass. We saved about $20-$25 on this game through the Season Pass, maybe even more.
>
> The idea that blits also ruined you… That was your own damn fault. They didn’t ask you to buy these blits cards, and I never even fealt pressured to get them to win. I got so many packs that I felt fine with all I have and had no need to buy packs. BUYING BLITZ PACKS ARE YOUR OWN DOWNFALL, NOT 343I FAULT THAT YOU SPENT MORE THAN YOU NEEDED TO.
>
> Lastly, how is paying $20 for a large campaign edition with cutscenes, along with a new gamemode, with a new enemy race, along with TWO new leaders a bad thing? It’s not, either pay the money or don’t, or you can spend $20 on a CoD DLC pack that gives you FOUR Multiplayer maps, see how far that gets you.
Season pass is $30 separately, but you can’t be bothered to read I guess. We were promised more than just leaders in the season pass, but again, who needs reading amirite?
Also saying the leaders are worth $6 and are a total value of $35 varies by user. Not all of us csre about 7 whole leaders for a niche RTS game we like it because it’s Halo though and we wanted more story, which the season pass promised an expansion of and then changed it to missions instead without a lot of us knowing. Now the season pass holders are left with a bunch of leaders and we get just 2 campaign missions and the campaign DLC we all expected is revealed to us as completely separate and $20.
But you didn’t understand that since you seem incapable of reading and comprehending all the posts we’ve already put out.
How about I do you one better? I buy the Witcher 3’s season pass for $25 and get over 40 hours of new content, an entire new region to explore and new questlines, armor, weapons you name it. Better yet I actually get all the DLC in the game as part of the season pass and shocker the Witcher 3 has no microtransactions. In fact all the DLC in the Witcher 3 that isn’t part of the season pass is free. Please tell me how mindlessly shilling and blaming consumers for a company’s shady practices is our fault. Please go ahead I am genuinely interested.
> 2533274816232010;324:
> > 2533274927740213;304:
> > > 2533274875084332;293:
> > > > 2533274927740213;285:
> > > > > 2533274870790671;280:
> > > > > > 2533274875970588;278:
> > > > > > > 2533274870790671;276:
> > > > > > > > 2533274875970588;273:
> > > > > > > > > 2533274870790671;271:
> > > > > > > > > > 2533274875970588;268:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535470524887292;266:
> > > > > > > > > > > I’m planning on purchasing the ATN expansion, but as someone who bought the ultimate edition of HW2, I do feel swindled. If they had given me the promised campaign expansion (my primary reason for buying the ultimate edition that includes the season pass) before announcing the ATN expansion I probably wouldn’t be as upset. But changing the description of the pass like they did and then announcing this so soon, before giving season pass owners their promised campaign expansion, was a cheap move, possibly even shady, and I completely understand why some people will not support 343 after this. I’m tempted to say the same, but I still enjoy Halo too much not to support 343. But in the future I will be warier of any season passes 343 has before deciding to purchase them.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We’re still getting some campaign missions. I think the sales of HW2 were too low so they’re now charging for it to not go too negative.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > we get 2 missions
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wow such an amazing campaign
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Note: “some campaign missions” I didn’t say it was a full campaign. ATN is not the season pass missions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > yet it should be
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why?? When you pay $60 for a full campaign. That’s a deal for $20 and more gamemodes, maps, and leaders.
> > > > >
> > > > > because the ultimate edition/season pass description had it in it
> > > > >
> > > > > i dont care about mp game modes [firefight seems to be mp only] and care very little about new leaders
> > > > >
> > > > > i got the ultimate edition just for the campaign
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn’t have gotten the ultimate edition then, would’ve been cheaper to just buy the DLC when it dropped.
> >
> > Fair enough. But still, if you only wanted a small portion of the DLC why purchase the season pass? That just sounds like a bad decision.
>
> I’ll list this for the third time now in reply to you:
> The season pass explicitly stated he would get the content that he wanted, for the price of the content individually. $20 for Ultimate Edition vs. $20 for ATN. The difference is he could buy them separately, or he could buy it in a bundle with a bunch of other stuff thrown in basically free. It really doesn’t sound like a bad decision at all and I’m not even remotely sure how one could even attempt to spin it that way.
>
> I beg you to construct a logical argument as to why he should not have bought the Ultimate Edition for the same price as ATN DLC when it also said he would be getting the HW: DE, additional leaders, updates for more than six months and the expansion.
If you’re asking for a logical argument, here you go:
> 2533274831961512;325:
> > 2533274958772240;323:
> >
>
> Also saying the leaders are worth $6 and are a total value of $35 varies by user. Not all of us csre about 7 whole leaders for a niche RTS game we like it because it’s Halo though and we wanted more story, which the season pass promised an expansion of and then changed it to missions instead without a lot of us knowing.
>
> How about I do you one better? I buy the Witcher 3’s season pass for $25 and get over 40 hours of new content, an entire new region to explore and new questlines, armor, weapons you name it. Better yet I actually get all the DLC in the game as part of the season pass and shocker the Witcher 3 has no microtransactions. In fact all the DLC in the Witcher 3 that isn’t part of the season pass is free. Please tell me how mindlessly shilling and blaming consumers for a company’s shady practices is our fault. Please go ahead I am genuinely interested.
The whole “I didn’t want all the leaders” is the disadvantage of purchasing a season pass. You may not want all the DLC, that’s the inherent risk of purchasing it so I don’t really feel like that is a valid argument when gauging the monetary value of the season pass.
That said CD Project Red are the paragons in the gaming industry. Every publisher should strive to be like them. That said not every developer has the benefit of being their own publisher.
WTF
Please lets continue our philosophy class. What are all these nonsense comments? Let me brake the problem or dishonesty in a few words down to you so you understand that also with your horizon:
Season Pass was designed from the beginning to bring extra content for the campaign. THERE WAS NEVER EVER MENTIONED that another content is coming which is NOT covered BY THE SEASON PASS.
Now they release new content, which also Season Pass Holders who already have paid 20-30$ extra to the regular game price, have to pay in full.
Is that so difficult to get?
> 2533274800596559;3:
> I’m more surprised that people expected an entire expansion to be given away to them.
Excuse me! I paid 100 bucks for this thing, if I get a seasons pass, it means I get all the DLC. You want me to make that 120 if I’ve already supported the DLC endeavour?
> 2533274883849234;5:
> Consider this:
>
>
> - Full fledged campaign featuring the Flood and where you play as the Banished - Two leaders - A new gamemode - Blur cutscenesWe’re still getting plenty of the content with the season pass and that still includes the Operation: SPEARBREAKER mini campaign. Six leaders that cost $5 each already makes the season pass and Ultimate Edition a huge bargain deal but we’re still getting two more campaign missions.
>
> Remember, Blur cutscenes are not cheap to make. They’re probably a big reason why this is going to cost $20.
>
> I’m not trying to defend 343i on all of this, I’m also annoyed it’s not in the SE however I do see the reasons why they made it a separate expansion. I also really want to hear more about Spearbreaker. All we know is that it’s two missions, in the season pass, and (judging from the name) from the UNSC prospective. We know more about this expansion than something announced and teased to be coming for season pass holders months again.
I know it’s not cheap, but they’ve already made a serious $100 from me paying for that seasons pass, plus they expect me to buy blitz packs, and are you serious if it’s going to be 20 bucks more? Are you serious?
> 2533274927740213;326:
> > 2533274816232010;324:
> > > 2533274927740213;304:
> > > > 2533274875084332;293:
> > > > > 2533274927740213;285:
> > > > > > 2533274870790671;280:
> > > > > > > 2533274875970588;278:
> > > > > > > > 2533274870790671;276:
> > > > > > > > > 2533274875970588;273:
> > > > > > > > > > 2533274870790671;271:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2533274875970588;268:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535470524887292;266:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I’m planning on purchasing the ATN expansion, but as someone who bought the ultimate edition of HW2, I do feel swindled. If they had given me the promised campaign expansion (my primary reason for buying the ultimate edition that includes the season pass) before announcing the ATN expansion I probably wouldn’t be as upset. But changing the description of the pass like they did and then announcing this so soon, before giving season pass owners their promised campaign expansion, was a cheap move, possibly even shady, and I completely understand why some people will not support 343 after this. I’m tempted to say the same, but I still enjoy Halo too much not to support 343. But in the future I will be warier of any season passes 343 has before deciding to purchase them.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We’re still getting some campaign missions. I think the sales of HW2 were too low so they’re now charging for it to not go too negative.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > we get 2 missions
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wow such an amazing campaign
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Note: “some campaign missions” I didn’t say it was a full campaign. ATN is not the season pass missions.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > yet it should be
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why?? When you pay $60 for a full campaign. That’s a deal for $20 and more gamemodes, maps, and leaders.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > because the ultimate edition/season pass description had it in it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i dont care about mp game modes [firefight seems to be mp only] and care very little about new leaders
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i got the ultimate edition just for the campaign
> > > > >
> > > > > I wouldn’t have gotten the ultimate edition then, would’ve been cheaper to just buy the DLC when it dropped.
> > >
> > > Fair enough. But still, if you only wanted a small portion of the DLC why purchase the season pass? That just sounds like a bad decision.
> >
> > I’ll list this for the third time now in reply to you:
> > The season pass explicitly stated he would get the content that he wanted, for the price of the content individually. $20 for Ultimate Edition vs. $20 for ATN. The difference is he could buy them separately, or he could buy it in a bundle with a bunch of other stuff thrown in basically free. It really doesn’t sound like a bad decision at all and I’m not even remotely sure how one could even attempt to spin it that way.
> >
> > I beg you to construct a logical argument as to why he should not have bought the Ultimate Edition for the same price as ATN DLC when it also said he would be getting the HW: DE, additional leaders, updates for more than six months and the expansion.
>
> If you’re asking for a logical argument, here you go:
> - The user said he never plays multiplayer, and has no interest in it. To me that shows he didn’t really care that he got leaders for a deal. To go off of your previous burger and fries analogy, that’s like me paying 5 dollars for burgers and fries but not wanting and not eating my fries, I could have and probably should have just gotten the burger. - If the user wanted Halo Wars DE, that already costs 20 dollars, so he doesn’t really have much to complain about he basically is purchasing HWDE with two bonus missions for HW2. - Grim said that ATN was never intended to be part of the season pass, so attaching a 20 dollar price tag to Operation Spearbreaker is speculation.My statements about purchasing DLC separate rather than the season pass are only directed at people that said they have no interest in multiplayer. If someone is kind of interested in multiplayer and campaign then the season pass would be a reasonable purchase.
I’ll give you a better example: When my dad purchased our last house, he signed a contract for the house AND all of the furniture in the house. After the house was purchased and therefore the contract fulfilled the owners and real estate company decided not to give the furniture with the house. I’m sure you can imagine there was a bit of an issue. It’s the same exact thing. We were told what we’d be purchasing with a bundle. We “signed” and spent our money thereby fulfilling our end of the contract. 343i knowingly or not decided to be sneaky and decided not to uphold their end of the contract.
Edit: Sorry for being snarky by the way.
> 2533275013567761;330:
> > 2533274883849234;5:
> > Consider this:
> >
> >
> > - Full fledged campaign featuring the Flood and where you play as the Banished - Two leaders - A new gamemode - Blur cutscenesWe’re still getting plenty of the content with the season pass and that still includes the Operation: SPEARBREAKER mini campaign. Six leaders that cost $5 each already makes the season pass and Ultimate Edition a huge bargain deal but we’re still getting two more campaign missions.
> >
> > Remember, Blur cutscenes are not cheap to make. They’re probably a big reason why this is going to cost $20.
> >
> > I’m not trying to defend 343i on all of this, I’m also annoyed it’s not in the SE however I do see the reasons why they made it a separate expansion. I also really want to hear more about Spearbreaker. All we know is that it’s two missions, in the season pass, and (judging from the name) from the UNSC prospective. We know more about this expansion than something announced and teased to be coming for season pass holders months again.
>
> I know it’s not cheap, but they’ve already made a serious $100 from me paying for that seasons pass, plus they expect me to buy blitz packs, and are you serious if it’s going to be 20 bucks more? Are you serious?
> 2535466433512301;328:
> WTFPlease lets continue our philosophy class. What are all these nonsense comments? Let me brake the problem or dishonesty in a few words down to you so you understand that also with your horizon:
>
> Season Pass was designed from the beginning to bring extra content for the campaign. THERE WAS NEVER EVER MENTIONED that another content is coming which is NOT covered BY THE SEASON PASS.
>
> Now they release new content, which also Season Pass Holders who already have paid 20-30$ extra to the regular game price, have to pay in full.
>
> Is that so difficult to get?
They never mentioned that it’d cover all DLC, it stated 6 months and more. That was too vague and people expected the season pass to cover all content then, when it was never stated. The season pass for some games covers all content and for others some content, season pass doesn’t equal all content. I don’t like having to read a description very carefully and look for specific wording to make my decision but that’s just the way it is, it should be easy for the consumer to know
The season pass description was changed before the game launched to say extra missions which it will fulfill with the two coming out, even calling that an expansion would be technically true even though you’d expect more content. Calling it an expansion was probably dropped to differentiate it from ATM.
NEVER preorder a game or DLC, wait until it’s out to make your decision. Buying a season pass just for one specific piece of content will nearly always turn out more expensive than buying it separate anyway. If you wanted it just for story DLC wait until the DLC is out and then decide if you want to buy it separate or the season pass.
> 2535465531666500;309:
> so if i only play multiplayer im going to have to pay an extra 20$ just for 2 leaders if i have a season pass already?.
just like how us campaign fans payed £20 for just mp stuff
not fun at all
> 2533274831961512;325:
> > 2533274958772240;323:
> > I think that all this hate is dumb.
> >
> > SP Holders got;
> > 1. Kinsano
> > 2. Colony
> > 3. Johnson
> > 4. Jerome
> > 5. Arbiter
> > 6. Unnamed
> > 7. Unnamed
> >
> > That is 7 leaders which together would of costed $35. How much did you pay for SP? $20 on ULT Edition, and $25 standard; that is a $15 save for many of us. Not to mention we are getting a mini-campaign which would probably be $5-$10 w/o the Season pass. We saved about $20-$25 on this game through the Season Pass, maybe even more.
> >
> > The idea that blits also ruined you… That was your own damn fault. They didn’t ask you to buy these blits cards, and I never even fealt pressured to get them to win. I got so many packs that I felt fine with all I have and had no need to buy packs. BUYING BLITZ PACKS ARE YOUR OWN DOWNFALL, NOT 343I FAULT THAT YOU SPENT MORE THAN YOU NEEDED TO.
> >
> > Lastly, how is paying $20 for a large campaign edition with cutscenes, along with a new gamemode, with a new enemy race, along with TWO new leaders a bad thing? It’s not, either pay the money or don’t, or you can spend $20 on a CoD DLC pack that gives you FOUR Multiplayer maps, see how far that gets you.
>
> Season pass is $30 separately, but you can’t be bothered to read I guess. We were promised more than just leaders in the season pass, but again, who needs reading amirite?
>
> Also saying the leaders are worth $6 and are a total value of $35 varies by user. Not all of us csre about 7 whole leaders for a niche RTS game we like it because it’s Halo though and we wanted more story, which the season pass promised an expansion of and then changed it to missions instead without a lot of us knowing. Now the season pass holders are left with a bunch of leaders and we get just 2 campaign missions and the campaign DLC we all expected is revealed to us as completely separate and $20.
>
> But you didn’t understand that since you seem incapable of reading and comprehending all the posts we’ve already put out.
>
> How about I do you one better? I buy the Witcher 3’s season pass for $25 and get over 40 hours of new content, an entire new region to explore and new questlines, armor, weapons you name it. Better yet I actually get all the DLC in the game as part of the season pass and shocker the Witcher 3 has no microtransactions. In fact all the DLC in the Witcher 3 that isn’t part of the season pass is free. Please tell me how mindlessly shilling and blaming consumers for a company’s shady practices is our fault. Please go ahead I am genuinely interested.
Campaign missions is Campaign DLC; Season Pass covered what was promised. I knew you were promised more than just leaders which you are getting.
Simply don’t buy the expansion maybe? Might save yourself the headache.
> 2533274927740213;327:
> > 2533274831961512;325:
> > > 2533274958772240;323:
> > >
> >
> > Also saying the leaders are worth $6 and are a total value of $35 varies by user. Not all of us csre about 7 whole leaders for a niche RTS game we like it because it’s Halo though and we wanted more story, which the season pass promised an expansion of and then changed it to missions instead without a lot of us knowing.
> >
> > How about I do you one better? I buy the Witcher 3’s season pass for $25 and get over 40 hours of new content, an entire new region to explore and new questlines, armor, weapons you name it. Better yet I actually get all the DLC in the game as part of the season pass and shocker the Witcher 3 has no microtransactions. In fact all the DLC in the Witcher 3 that isn’t part of the season pass is free. Please tell me how mindlessly shilling and blaming consumers for a company’s shady practices is our fault. Please go ahead I am genuinely interested.
>
> The whole “I didn’t want all the leaders” is the disadvantage of purchasing a season pass. You may not want all the DLC, that’s the inherent risk of purchasing it so I don’t really feel like that is a valid argument when gauging the monetary value of the season pass.
>
> That said CD Project Red are the paragons in the gaming industry. Every publisher should strive to be like them. That said not every developer has the benefit of being their own publisher.
I don’t mind additional leaders. What i take issue with is that the season pass is predominantly leaders and it is not what was advertised.
We’ve been going back and forth like this for pages now. When you promise a campaign expansion and give me 7 leaders instead and just 2 campaign missions in a game that had 6 leaders to start with and is 3v3 max it is just unnecessary to shove in so many new leaders, not to mention basically false advertising on the part of the season pass description. It really honestly should have been called the Leader pass at this point since it has featured, to this point only leaders and will wrap up by releasing almost entirely leaders.
> 2533274958772240;335:
> > 2533274831961512;325:
> > > 2533274958772240;323:
> > > I think that all this hate is dumb.
> > >
> > > SP Holders got;
> > > 1. Kinsano
> > > 2. Colony
> > > 3. Johnson
> > > 4. Jerome
> > > 5. Arbiter
> > > 6. Unnamed
> > > 7. Unnamed
> > >
> > > That is 7 leaders which together would of costed $35. How much did you pay for SP? $20 on ULT Edition, and $25 standard; that is a $15 save for many of us. Not to mention we are getting a mini-campaign which would probably be $5-$10 w/o the Season pass. We saved about $20-$25 on this game through the Season Pass, maybe even more.
> > >
> > > The idea that blits also ruined you… That was your own damn fault. They didn’t ask you to buy these blits cards, and I never even fealt pressured to get them to win. I got so many packs that I felt fine with all I have and had no need to buy packs. BUYING BLITZ PACKS ARE YOUR OWN DOWNFALL, NOT 343I FAULT THAT YOU SPENT MORE THAN YOU NEEDED TO.
> > >
> > > Lastly, how is paying $20 for a large campaign edition with cutscenes, along with a new gamemode, with a new enemy race, along with TWO new leaders a bad thing? It’s not, either pay the money or don’t, or you can spend $20 on a CoD DLC pack that gives you FOUR Multiplayer maps, see how far that gets you.
> >
> > Season pass is $30 separately, but you can’t be bothered to read I guess. We were promised more than just leaders in the season pass, but again, who needs reading amirite?
> >
> > Also saying the leaders are worth $6 and are a total value of $35 varies by user. Not all of us csre about 7 whole leaders for a niche RTS game we like it because it’s Halo though and we wanted more story, which the season pass promised an expansion of and then changed it to missions instead without a lot of us knowing. Now the season pass holders are left with a bunch of leaders and we get just 2 campaign missions and the campaign DLC we all expected is revealed to us as completely separate and $20.
> >
> > But you didn’t understand that since you seem incapable of reading and comprehending all the posts we’ve already put out.
> >
> > How about I do you one better? I buy the Witcher 3’s season pass for $25 and get over 40 hours of new content, an entire new region to explore and new questlines, armor, weapons you name it. Better yet I actually get all the DLC in the game as part of the season pass and shocker the Witcher 3 has no microtransactions. In fact all the DLC in the Witcher 3 that isn’t part of the season pass is free. Please tell me how mindlessly shilling and blaming consumers for a company’s shady practices is our fault. Please go ahead I am genuinely interested.
>
> Campaign missions is Campaign DLC; Season Pass covered what was promised. I knew you were promised more than just leaders which you are getting.
>
> Simply don’t buy the expansion maybe? Might save yourself the headache.
I’m not going to buy it because I’m not about to encourage 343 doing this -Yoink- repeatedly. Hell I’ve been fed up with 343 for a while now, but this is my line.
Unlike most people I’ll vote with my wallet and walk away from the series rather than buy the stupid DLC which is what most boneheads will do anyway, but just because I’m not buying it doesn’t mean I’m not going to stop pointing out how anti-consumer this is.
> 2533275013567761;330:
> > 2533274883849234;5:
> > Consider this:
> >
> >
> > - Full fledged campaign featuring the Flood and where you play as the Banished - Two leaders - A new gamemode - Blur cutscenesWe’re still getting plenty of the content with the season pass and that still includes the Operation: SPEARBREAKER mini campaign. Six leaders that cost $5 each already makes the season pass and Ultimate Edition a huge bargain deal but we’re still getting two more campaign missions.
> >
> > Remember, Blur cutscenes are not cheap to make. They’re probably a big reason why this is going to cost $20.
> >
> > I’m not trying to defend 343i on all of this, I’m also annoyed it’s not in the SE however I do see the reasons why they made it a separate expansion. I also really want to hear more about Spearbreaker. All we know is that it’s two missions, in the season pass, and (judging from the name) from the UNSC prospective. We know more about this expansion than something announced and teased to be coming for season pass holders months again.
>
> I know it’s not cheap, but they’ve already made a serious $100 from me paying for that seasons pass, plus they expect me to buy blitz packs, and are you serious if it’s going to be 20 bucks more? Are you serious?
You got ripped off my friend because I believe the ultimate edition was $80… Also, they’ve only made $20 from you paying for the seasons pass… $60 for the game and $20 for the seasons pass.
Since when do they “expect” you to buy blitz packs? When you purchased the game, did 343 dial you up and say “we expect you to buy blitz packs”? I doubt it.
this infatuation everyone has with blur cutscenes is bonkers.
they aren’t that good.
they aren’t worth enough to justify anything. stop using them in an argument because it means we can immediately disregard everything you’ve said.
> 2533274802796519;338:
> > 2533275013567761;330:
> > > 2533274883849234;5:
> > > Consider this:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Full fledged campaign featuring the Flood and where you play as the Banished - Two leaders - A new gamemode - Blur cutscenesWe’re still getting plenty of the content with the season pass and that still includes the Operation: SPEARBREAKER mini campaign. Six leaders that cost $5 each already makes the season pass and Ultimate Edition a huge bargain deal but we’re still getting two more campaign missions.
> > >
> > > Remember, Blur cutscenes are not cheap to make. They’re probably a big reason why this is going to cost $20.
> > >
> > > I’m not trying to defend 343i on all of this, I’m also annoyed it’s not in the SE however I do see the reasons why they made it a separate expansion. I also really want to hear more about Spearbreaker. All we know is that it’s two missions, in the season pass, and (judging from the name) from the UNSC prospective. We know more about this expansion than something announced and teased to be coming for season pass holders months again.
> >
> > I know it’s not cheap, but they’ve already made a serious $100 from me paying for that seasons pass, plus they expect me to buy blitz packs, and are you serious if it’s going to be 20 bucks more? Are you serious?
>
> You got ripped off my friend because I believe the ultimate edition was $80… Also, they’ve only made $20 from you paying for the seasons pass… $60 for the game and $20 for the seasons pass.
>
> Since when do they “expect” you to buy blitz packs? When you purchased the game, did 343 dial you up and say “we expect you to buy blitz packs”? I doubt it.
except they expected everyone to buy blitz packs otherwise they wouldn’t have put them in the game. there would be no other reason to put them in the game then.