Is the Assault Warzone playlist dead? I can’t seem to find a match
Warzone Assault has generally suffered from long search times for a while now. Try going with some teammates and you may have better luck.
> 2535429593088083;2:
> Warzone Assault has generally suffered from long search times for a while now. Try going with some teammates and you may have better luck.
Thanks. Matchmaking is a little bit faster when in a team
Make sure youre searching on expanded settings as well.
Its a pretty fun playlist, its a shame it suffers population.
The most people play warzone or firefight but i sometimes play garzone assault
That’s because Warzone Assault is flawed, if you’re on Offense you HAVE to capture both bases AND destroy the enemy core within the time limit. And there’s no sudden death, they give you 6 minutes each round, but in all honesty you have about 5 minutes, because it takes nearly a full minute to capture an objective.
If you’re on Defense, all you have to do is stop the enemy ONE TIME and you automatically win. Which is complete bullsh*t.
How it should work is: Teams are chosen for Defense and Offense, then after they fail or succeed, the teams should switch sides to see if the other team can do it. If both teams succeed/fail, then it becomes a tie.
Oops… Double post
> 2533274792854607;7:
> That’s because Warzone Assault is flawed, if you’re on Offense you HAVE to capture both bases AND destroy the enemy core within the time limit. And there’s no sudden death, they give you 6 minutes each round, but in all honesty you have about 5 minutes, because it takes nearly a full minute to capture an objective.
>
> If you’re on Defense, all you have to do is stop the enemy ONE TIME and you automatically win. Which is complete bullsh*t.
>
> How it should work is: Teams are chosen for Defense and Offense, then after they fail or succeed, the teams should switch sides to see if the other team can do it. If both teams succeed/fail, then it becomes a tie.
Offense has attacking advantages on Array and Dispatch.
It takes 15 seconds to cap a base. I think you made a minute up…
How it should work: don’t whine about the playlist and don’t play it if you don’t like it. Your method’s big flaw is that, for example, Team A defends on Temple and fails. Then some will quit because attacking is so unfair on that map. Also, it gives teams 36 minutes to farm instead of 18
> 2535453278998196;9:
> > 2533274792854607;7:
> >
You can sit here and complain about my personal opinion all you want lol but I’m not changing my mind because Offense IS at a disadvantage from the start until the end. Defense has the best advantages to win, all they have to do is survive ONE ROUND… Offense HAS to survive ALL THREE in order to win. Defense can win the game in 6 minutes, Offense could NEVER win in 6 minutes unless the entire enemy team quits and that’s not fair at all.
You can only capture a base in 20 seconds if the enemy isn’t trying to contest it. There is always enemies trying to jump into the base and hide somewhere, which contests the base and lets the game clock tick away and there isn’t even a sudden death!
If we could play both Defense and Offense, it would be a longer game, but better…
> 2533274792854607;10:
> > 2535453278998196;9:
> > > 2533274792854607;7:
> > >
>
> You can sit here and complain about my personal opinion all you want lol but I’m not changing my mind because Offense IS at a disadvantage from the start until the end. Defense has the best advantages to win, all they have to do is survive ONE ROUND… Offense HAS to survive ALL THREE in order to win. Defense can win the game in 6 minutes, Offense could NEVER win in 6 minutes unless the entire enemy team quits and that’s not fair at all.
>
> You can only capture a base in 20 seconds if the enemy isn’t trying to contest it. There is always enemies trying to jump into the base and hide somewhere, which contests the base and lets the game clock tick away and there isn’t even a sudden death!
>
> If we could play both Defense and Offense, it would be a longer game, but better…
You have no idea what you’re talking about. Obviously from many things you said. 15 seconds is a fact. Also, offense can win in under 6 minutes easy. I rarely take more than 6 mins to win
> 2535453278998196;11:
>
Dude lol are you slow or something? It doesn’t matter if you can capture a base in 5 seconds… Defense is playing with a stacked deck because all they have to do is win ONE ROUND… Offense has to win THREE ROUNDS. That is completely unfair to both sides, Defense is getting robbed because they are playing an Offense that is handicapped, and Offense is getting robbed because they have to do TRIPLE THE AMOUNT OF WORK to equal what Defense has to do in one round… it’s not my problem that you’re too ignorant to understand this. Instead you just keep pointing out other things while completely avoiding the fact that Warzone Assault is inevitably flawed. You obviously like unfair games where you have the advantage over the other team, but I do not. I like my skill to be fairly tested, not have the victory handed to me or fight an uphill battle from the start of a game all because 343 doesn’t know how to create a faster Warzone Gametype.
> 2533274792854607;12:
> > 2535453278998196;11:
> >
>
> Dude lol are you slow or something? It doesn’t matter if you can capture a base in 5 seconds… Defense is playing with a stacked deck because all they have to do is win ONE ROUND… Offense has to win THREE ROUNDS. That is completely unfair to both sides, Defense is getting robbed because they are playing an Offense that is handicapped, and Offense is getting robbed because they have to do TRIPLE THE AMOUNT OF WORK to equal what Defense has to do in one round… it’s not my problem that you’re too ignorant to understand this. Instead you just keep pointing out other things while completely avoiding the fact that Warzone Assault is inevitably flawed. You obviously like unfair games where you have the advantage over the other team, but I do not. I like my skill to be fairly tested, not have the victory handed to me or fight an uphill battle from the start of a game all because 343 doesn’t know how to create a faster Warzone Gametype.
Agreed!
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members. This includes stat-flaming.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2533274792854607;12:
> > 2535453278998196;11:
> >
>
> Dude lol are you slow or something? It doesn’t matter if you can capture a base in 5 seconds… Defense is playing with a stacked deck because all they have to do is win ONE ROUND… Offense has to win THREE ROUNDS. That is completely unfair to both sides, Defense is getting robbed because they are playing an Offense that is handicapped, and Offense is getting robbed because they have to do TRIPLE THE AMOUNT OF WORK to equal what Defense has to do in one round… it’s not my problem that you’re too ignorant to understand this. Instead you just keep pointing out other things while completely avoiding the fact that Warzone Assault is inevitably flawed. You obviously like unfair games where you have the advantage over the other team, but I do not. I like my skill to be fairly tested, not have the victory handed to me or fight an uphill battle from the start of a game all because 343 doesn’t know how to create a faster Warzone Gametype.
Sounds like you have no idea how to play Assault and are bad at it too. Backed up by the fact you only have 600 games and go 10 and 9 every game. In other words, you’re not a game-changer (aka Rando)
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not purposely bypass the word filter.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2535453278998196;14:
> > 2533274792854607;12:
> > > 2535453278998196;11:
> > >
Oh wow lmao here we go, nice job going completely off topic all because you lost the argument, I guess now it’s a d*ck measuring contest lol somebody must be feeling really insecure… But yeah, that’s why my overall Arena stats are better then yours, you like to play unfair Warzone Assault games with your little clan or team, and whenever I do play Halo 5 it’s mainly Arena/Ranked matches by myself with only help from random players, and I still have a better Kill/Death ratio and higher rank than you lol. ALSO, If I did play more Warzone and played with a team like you do all the time, I’d probably be better than you at that too but Halo 5 is just not that important to me. But based on my K/D in ARENA AND IN WARZONE and my Overall CSR Ranking, I’m still an all around better player than you are, I can easily achieve your best rank of Diamond 1 or better in any Ranked WITH A TEAM OF RANDOMS. So, unfortunately, I’m better than you at everything else besides Warzone Assault(even though I have less games than you, my K/D is WAY BETTER than yours!) lol I barely play Halo 5 as it is and I almost have as many Arena/Ranked victories as you have TOTAL GAMES! It’s also really funny that you conveniently left out anything about my Arena stats and the fact that even though I’ve played less games in Warzone than you I almost have the same Win % as you but I do have a WAY better K/D than you in your beloved Warzone playlist lmao.
Look, we can go back and forth about who’s stats are better, but until we go head to head we’ll never know who’s the best. I have friends that come over and play on my account, we pass the controller after each match so everyone gets a chance to play a game since Halo 5 doesn’t have split-screen. So just add me, and we’ll see who’s truly better. Otherwise, shut the hell up and move on with your life.
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> 2533274792854607;15:
> > 2535453278998196;14:
> > > 2533274792854607;12:
> > > > 2535453278998196;11:
> > > >
What the heck? Can you read? You have a good K/D because you play firefight. In PvP you have a 0.9 KD. Also I haven’t played ranked arena in over a year, and Diamond 5 is nothing to brag about. I’ve never ranked arena with a team. And we’re talking about WZA, (with your solid 0.9 WZA K/D). You’re such a noob thinking people don’t know about Firefight K/D bumping.
All I’m saying is, you don’t have enough skill to input in WZA. You’re one of the worthless randys
And if you want to get rekt I’ll 1v1 you, but I’m guessing you’ll chicken out. No one wants to get screenshotted losing to a Diamond 1 
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members. This includes stat-flaming.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Also, you average less than 10 kills a game in WZA. Once you can break 10 kills and go positive (against players and not AI lol) I’ll 1v1 you. Not worth my time ATM 
> 2533274792854607;7:
> That’s because Warzone Assault is flawed, if you’re on Offense you HAVE to capture both bases AND destroy the enemy core within the time limit. And there’s no sudden death, they give you 6 minutes each round, but in all honesty you have about 5 minutes, because it takes nearly a full minute to capture an objective.
>
> If you’re on Defense, all you have to do is stop the enemy ONE TIME and you automatically win. Which is complete bullsh*t.
>
> How it should work is: Teams are chosen for Defense and Offense, then after they fail or succeed, the teams should switch sides to see if the other team can do it. If both teams succeed/fail, then it becomes a tie.
How it should work: Teams are chosen for Defense and Offense, then after they fail or succeed, the teams should switch sides to see if the other team can do it “better”. Match ends during second team’s attempt the moment they improve or fail from what the first team accomplished; in other words, from their benchmark. Whatever the first team accomplishes the goal for the second team becomes to complete one more task or the same ones quicker. Only way to tie would be to complete the same number of tasks at the same time interval.
> 2535453278998196;16:
> > 2533274792854607;15:
> > > 2535453278998196;14:
> > > > 2533274792854607;12:
> > > > > 2535453278998196;11:
> > > > >
I’ve played more Warzone and WZ Assault than I have Firefight… so your point is baseless. But what does that say about your stats in Warzone Assault… Majority of your wins are on DEFENSE(big surprise there huh lmao) which is the entire reason why you’re here crying to me in this thread. You probably quit WZ Assault matches that put you on Offense so you can purposely get on Defense…
Also, you say I’m not worth your time in a 1v1 because my WZ Assault stats aren’t as glorious as yours, that’s completely irrelevant. Because in Arena or ANYTHING OTHER THAN WZ ASSAULT, I can dominate you. Stick to Warzone Assault, because that’s ALL you got… lol
Add me and play me, or shut the hell up kid.
> 2775209234672000;18:
> > 2533274792854607;7:
> >
>
> How it should work: Teams are chosen for Defense and Offense, then after they fail or succeed, the teams should switch sides to see if the other team can do it “better”. Match ends during second team’s attempt the moment they improve or fail from what the first team accomplished. Whatever the first team accomplishes the goal for the second team becomes to complete one more task or the same ones quicker. Only way to tie would be to complete the same number of tasks at the same time interval.
I agree, anything else would be better than how they have it now.