It just proves you to be a sore loser when you leave when you know you’re clearly going to lose. It happens too often and I feel that these people must do it often, so I ask, do you think the bans are too soft?
With all of the randoms complaining about it on the forums with DNF history books on their profile and a lot of my games are finishing 4 v 4. So I think it is working as intended. Goldylocks is sleeping with my banhammer because it’s just right.
Not a matter of being a sore loser most of the time with these servers. People usually get kicked out at random. 343 can make a good game, but they can’t maintain their servers. I couldn’t play online on Halo 4 (which launched November 6, 2012) until about March without the risk of being kicked because of the servers.
Halo: MCC had the same problem until they fixed it. Halo 5 I get lucky and have only been kicked out occasionally, still no bans. This is the one time I’m lucky, many others haven’t gotten to play because of them.
Even as a random, I never quit a game unless it’s absolutely necessary, even though my team typically lose.
> 2533274818737568;3:
> Not a matter of being a sore loser most of the time with these servers. People usually get kicked out at random. 343 can make a good game, but they can’t maintain their servers. I couldn’t play online on Halo 4 (which launched November 6, 2012) until about March without the risk of being kicked because of the servers.
>
> Halo: MCC had the same problem until they fixed it. Halo 5 I get lucky and have only been kicked out occasionally, still no bans. This is the one time I’m lucky, many others haven’t gotten to play because of them.
I can understand when people lose connection as such, but I’m talking about if people purposely leave during a losing match.
> 2533274973681092;4:
> Even as a random, I never quit a game unless it’s absolutely necessary, even though my team typically lose.
Give this man a gold pack.
They should be harsher. I think longer bans or req point fines would work well!
Yes too soft
I get kicked mid game all the time from servers and haven’t been banned because I don’t leave games
> 2535471595119823;5:
> > 2533274818737568;3:
> > Not a matter of being a sore loser most of the time with these servers. People usually get kicked out at random. 343 can make a good game, but they can’t maintain their servers. I couldn’t play online on Halo 4 (which launched November 6, 2012) until about March without the risk of being kicked because of the servers.
> >
> > Halo: MCC had the same problem until they fixed it. Halo 5 I get lucky and have only been kicked out occasionally, still no bans. This is the one time I’m lucky, many others haven’t gotten to play because of them.
>
>
> I can understand when people lose connection as such, but I’m talking about if people purposely leave during a losing match.
>
>
> > 2533274973681092;4:
> > Even as a random, I never quit a game unless it’s absolutely necessary, even though my team typically lose.
>
>
> Give this man a gold pack.
Oh, well leaving intentionally is just being a -Yoink!- to your team most of the time. Sometimes there is a good reason. Speaking of giving gold packs, there are about 4 or 5 gold packs I could have afforded if the servers didn’t crap out and steal the points I worked for.
I think its fine, the bans get longer each time they are banned so it adds up.
We could all find the gamercards of these people that openly admit to quitting and report them for it! What do Microsoft do if someone get’s a lot of bad feedback?
> 2601632999026533;10:
> We could all find the gamercards of these people that openly admit to quitting and report them for it! What do Microsoft do if someone get’s a lot of bad feedback?
Think in order for that to work, you have to play with/against them.
It seems that most people on here are against bans, or at least how they currently are. I’ve never been banned and I rarely leave games so I think they’re fair.
Too hard, if anything.