Any word on Halo Reach and Halo Wars if they will be added to the Next Gen Console?
I Mean We Now have Halo CE/Anniversary, Halo 2/Anniversary, Halo 3 and Halo 4 on the MCC. And Halo Spartan Assault on the next gen Consoles. With Halo 5 Guardians, Halo 3 ODST and Halo Spartan Strike on the Way!
So where is Halo Reach and Halo Wars at 343 Industries?
Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
… Stahp
> 2602973356072471;2:
> Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
Everyone needs to chill with the idea of adding Reach. What we have needs to be completely fixed before the notion of adding Reach is even acknowledged by 343.
Adding reach is like priority 17404702 right now. Maybe in 2016. It’s the worst game of the series outside H4 anyway.
> 2533274890980480;4:
> > 2602973356072471;2:
> > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
>
>
> no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
Disagree. …I thought halo wars was one of the funniest multiplayer games on 360. Saying a RTS is unbalanced doesn’t really make sense if you know how to play.
Stop making all these dumb threads about this. Go play your 360.
> 2533274817480932;7:
> Stop making all these dumb threads about this. Go play your 360.
You do know that there’s a reason people bought TMCC right?
> 2533274974596436;8:
> > 2533274817480932;7:
> > Stop making all these dumb threads about this. Go play your 360.
>
>
> You do know that there’s a reason people bought TMCC right?
Yea, and hopefully garbage Halo Reach wasn’t one of them, is they made it very clear which games would be included in the collection.
> 2533274802342712;6:
> > 2533274890980480;4:
> > > 2602973356072471;2:
> > > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
> >
> >
> >
> > no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
>
>
> Disagree. …I thought halo wars was one of the funniest multiplayer games on 360. Saying a RTS is unbalanced doesn’t really make sense if you know how to play.
i agree, the design and execution was funny, absolutely laughable at how bad of an attempt it was… And the notion of RTS games being immune from balance issues is ridiculous. When your RTS doesn’t support almost half of RTS strategies then it is a failure as an RTS. In halo wars the lack of variety of defensive options, extremely low unit count, low unit variety… All these things crippled strategies like turtling, steamrolling, guerilla warfare, it seemed like the only viable strategy was using exploits while rushing, as a little corny game, sure it was amusing to some degree but as an RTS it was shameful
Reach is awful. All these 14 year olds need to chill
> 2533274890980480;10:
> > 2533274802342712;6:
> > > 2533274890980480;4:
> > > > 2602973356072471;2:
> > > > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > > > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
> >
> >
> >
> > Disagree. …I thought halo wars was one of the funniest multiplayer games on 360. Saying a RTS is unbalanced doesn’t really make sense if you know how to play.
>
>
> i agree, the design and execution was funny, absolutely laughable at how bad of an attempt it was… And the notion of RTS games being immune from balance issues is ridiculous. When your RTS doesn’t support almost half of RTS strategies then it is a failure as an RTS. In halo wars the lack of variety of defensive options, extremely low unit count, low unit variety… All these things crippled strategies like turtling, steamrolling, guerilla warfare, it seemed like the only viable strategy was using exploits while rushing, as a little corny game, sure it was amusing to some degree but as an RTS it was shameful
I guess you sucked at it
> 2535439246800400;9:
> > 2533274974596436;8:
> > > 2533274817480932;7:
> > > Stop making all these dumb threads about this. Go play your 360.
> >
> >
> >
> > You do know that there’s a reason people bought TMCC right?
>
>
> Yea, and hopefully garbage Halo Reach wasn’t one of them, is they made it very clear which games would be included in the collection.
halo reach was fun as hell. i have no idea why people continue to bash it
> 2533274890980480;4:
> > 2602973356072471;2:
> > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
>
>
> no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
Yes, we do if people enjoyed them. Halo wars was greatly loved by many people and was majorly underrated. Yes it was basic and needed some improvments, but it was still a fun game.
So yes. Halo Wars 2 needs to happen!
No more telling people things shouldn’t happen because you don’t like them for gods sake.
> 2533274802342712;12:
> > 2533274890980480;10:
> > > 2533274802342712;6:
> > > > 2533274890980480;4:
> > > > > 2602973356072471;2:
> > > > > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > > > > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Disagree. …I thought halo wars was one of the funniest multiplayer games on 360. Saying a RTS is unbalanced doesn’t really make sense if you know how to play.
> >
> >
> >
> > i agree, the design and execution was funny, absolutely laughable at how bad of an attempt it was… And the notion of RTS games being immune from balance issues is ridiculous. When your RTS doesn’t support almost half of RTS strategies then it is a failure as an RTS. In halo wars the lack of variety of defensive options, extremely low unit count, low unit variety… All these things crippled strategies like turtling, steamrolling, guerilla warfare, it seemed like the only viable strategy was using exploits while rushing, as a little corny game, sure it was amusing to some degree but as an RTS it was shameful
>
>
> I guess you sucked at it
lol nice rebuttal moron…if you like paying for trash that’s fine, go ask random people for their garbage and pay them, just stop asking for it to be a product, this is how devs get lazy, people ask for more garbage
> 2602973356072471;14:
> > 2533274890980480;4:
> > > 2602973356072471;2:
> > > Halo wars 2 needs to happen. Phil spencer made some hints about it a few months before xbox ones launch but i dont think itl happen ;( either way 343i will have nothing to do with Wars.
> > > Reach will most likely end up in the mcc some time though
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > no, we don’t need any more bad console RTS games… The first was unbalanced, boring and lacked in variety and gameplay, the only thing wars got right was its copied in game UI from command and conquer… No more cash grabs for gods sake, we don’t need to be sold the same things over and over…
>
>
>
> Yes, we do if people enjoyed them. Halo wars was greatly loved by many people and was majorly underrated. Yes it was basic and needed some improvments, but it was still a fun game.
> So yes. Halo Wars 2 needs to happen!
> No more telling people things shouldn’t happen because you don’t like them for gods sake.
it was under rated because it was a bad RTS that was NEVER improved, sure give it another shot if you will genuinely try to push out something worthy of the genre, but to vomit out a bad gimmick is gross, ESPECIALLY when the franchise at hand is suffering like never before
> 2533274850967778;11:
> Reach is awful. All these 14 year olds need to chill
please tell me what is so bad about reach other than ‘ARMUR LUCK’ because, while i agree that armor lock is not a good addition to the series, i’m tired of people only saying that when questioned about the game’s quality. i mean i’m sure some people hate the game for other reasons but i find no reason to dislike the game myself
> 2533274828737109;17:
> > 2533274850967778;11:
> > Reach is awful. All these 14 year olds need to chill
>
>
> please tell me what is so bad about reach other than ‘ARMUR LUCK’ because, while i agree that armor lock is not a good addition to the series, i’m tired of people only saying that when questioned about the game’s quality. i mean i’m sure some people hate the game for other reasons but i find no reason to dislike the game myself
there is no good reason, halo reach was the pinnacle of custom games
While Reach was good for clan garbage and customs it is easily the worst for competitive playing, ill pass.
Wars on the other hand I’d take a look at. While not a good RTS for RTSs sake, it was quite fun and I enjoyed it alot.
I dont know why people bash on each other for liking one halo over another. Reach was not my cup of tea, but it doesn’t mean somebody loved it. Same with wars and ODST. They are the odd ones out and I liked them more than a few of the main installments.
Love both of them, hope they will get released sometimes + HaloWars2