> 2533274867300866;103:
> > 2533274872596817;97:
> > > 2533274867300866;96:
> > > > 2533274872596817;94:
> > > > This poll is dumb in my opinion and I don’t see anything wrong with sprint.
> > > >
> > > > I think it’s a good idea to have one control available to us, just in case we need to move faster, like let’s just say you’re shields go down and you want to fall back to cover faster, or get across open space to reach a vehicle that you need?
> > > >
> > > > I love the classic Halo games, I really do, but I’m able to move on as well when the franchise evolves, and I feel sorry for those who don’t have the ability to do that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > “Evolves”? It isn’t evolution, just change. Evolution implies that it is a change that occurred due to natural selection, meaning said change helps something to survive. Sprinting has not helped Halo survive by any means. As a matter of fact it has done more than its part in putting nails in Halo’s coffin. Whether or not it is a good change is up to debate, however whether or not it could be described as evolution is a no brainer. I say we cut our losses and move forward without sprint. The new spartan abilities should be more than good enough to help mix up gameplay.
> >
> >
> >
> > Whatever, deal with it. I simply used the word “evolution” as in the franchise gets better over time which is how it changes, sir. Therefore that word can have a ton of other meanings. Not just change from natural selection. But you are obviously too stuck in the past and think it’s necessary to shut me down with your “facts” I will not tolerate anyone doing that to me here.
>
>
> Did you just try to refute my argument by saying you won’t tolerate facts? At least I used some facts, whether they were related to the topic at hand or not. You merely shrugged them off by saying “deal with it” then proceeded to make entirely opinionated claims in regards to the state of the franchise and treat such opinions as facts. You don’t need to be a member of your middle school debate club (I’m assuming you’re in middle school based on your uninstigated internet rage, sassy tone of voice, and misunderstanding of the word evolution. See, that is called inductive reasoning in case you didn’t know. Even if my conclusion is wrong, I still reached it through observations of things that are true) to figure out what you just said isn’t a valid argument.
I dont think you can use Dawrwins natural of selection to describe a video game franchise Eclypse PaniK, however if you insit to use biology terminology to describe it i will humor you.
Lets start with your use of natural selection, descibed by wiki
Natural selection is the gradual process by which heritable biological traits become either more or less common in a population as a function of the effect of inherited traits on the differential reproductive success of organisms interacting with their environment.
(So it has more to do with the environment shaping In this example it would be FPS games, most of them have sprint now in days including COD the FPS leader right now I dislike this game very much so a change to use sprint would in fact be beniftical to the game crazy huh…)
Further more Natural selection does not mean Evolution nor does it imply (Similar in type but not in token)
As described by wiki,
Evolution, also known as descent with modification, is the change in heritable phenotype traits of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including the level of species, individual organisms, and at the level of molecular evolution.
So in order for something to qualify as being evolved simply requires that it be a descendant that has modifications…
Halo Ce-Halo2-Halo3-Halo Wars-Halo3ODST-Halo Reach-Halo4
Reach/4 being in the descendant chain (Valid)
Reach/4 has modifications (Valid)
So your argument makes no true claim…