So I saw people talking about this, and want to set some things straight: These two leaders are not by any means on par with the high/top tier leaders like atriox and colony.
The core mechanics of Anders now revolve around quick tech to units, which quite frankly, is sub-par. Even if you get grenade throw at a cheaper price and research time, that doesn’t mean that Kinsano won’t run you over. That doesn’t mean that choppers won’t run you over. Her sentinels are also paper, as fighting starting marines/grunts is impossible. The best you could do is attempt to hit and run, but right now that doesn’t surmount to much if you don’t have a continuation to deal with the mid/late game. Interestingly, I feel that Anders is a relatively, ‘balanced’ leader, that there’s nothing broken about her, just that she needs a small buff. In a game where there’s extreme exploits like shield stacking, hunters brand, ect, there’s no way she can compete. She’s not used at a high level for a reason. Honestly, I feel Anders is a border line low tier
leader than anything.
As for forge, his rolling eco is his calling card. It’s a similar story to Anders, it’s fairly solid, but that’s it. What’s his follow up? He can build a normal army, but he’ll still struggle with the broken exploits that op leaders have.
Show some wins against some high level players with Forge/Anders, instead of just saying they’re op. RtsYodaVids knows what he’s talking about guys, listen to him, because he’s usually right.