And if Halo 4 is a evolution of the series

Games Other Halo
1

Sorry if what I writed makes no sense to you (this is my first topic of this type “Discussions”) and I’m not perfect on English too… :stuck_out_tongue:

And if Halo 4 is a evolution of the previous Halos?

I see topics talking about “Halo is copying COD with perks, killcams, etc” and they may be right or WRONG!

I don’t think that…

What if the costumizable loudouts are just an evolution of the loudout system in Halo Reach.(allowing costumizable loudouts in multiplayer)

What if ordenance drops are just an evolution of Weapon drop from Reach’s firefight (taked even further to multiplayer)

What if the tactical packages and support upgrades are just an evolution of Reach Armor Abilities or in other words… more feautures with the same objective has Armor Abilities (Giving more support and ways to the players)

What if killcams “don’t know the name of this system” are just an evolution of the previous Halo’s theathre mode (taked to multiplayer, letting us know about the situation right in the moment)

yes they may sound and have the same objective has COD perks, killcams, loudouts etc…

But this is 343’s Halo, and maybe they add this feautures has an evolution of what previous Halo’s already add and not copying COD.
These are very distinctive games, both good at their own way.

So its possible that we can call Halo 4 new feautures has an “evolution” and not CODish things?

I don’t wanna start a game war, just hate to see people complaining about a game that I believe that its gonna bring back Halo 3’s or 1 huge sucess level has unique games.

And again, this might had no sense to you but anyway, just wanted to give it a try at sharing my thoughts…

2

I completely agree. People should stop complaining so much about this and realize it’s a step up from the last game.

3

Whenever I get let down about something in Halo 4, I just look back two years and say “thank god it isn’t Reach”

4

> I completely agree. People should stop complaining so much about this and realize it’s a step up from the last game.

yes and I believe that this Halo will have huge sucess. Its a new studio, Halo fans who are creating Halo 4. They know what Halo is.
And thats what we need to think. That Halo 4 will be the next success for the series.

5

> Sorry if what I writed makes no sense to you (this is my first topic of this type “Discussions”) and I’m not perfect on English too… :stuck_out_tongue:
>
> And if Halo 4 is a evolution of the previous Halos?
>
> I see topics talking about “Halo is copying COD with perks, killcams, etc” and they may be right or WRONG!
>
> I don’t think that…
>
> What if the costumizable loudouts are just an evolution of the loudout system in Halo Reach.(allowing costumizable loudouts in multiplayer)
>
> What if ordenance drops are just an evolution of Weapon drop from Reach’s firefight (taked even further to multiplayer)
>
> What if the tactical packages and support upgrades are just an evolution of Reach Armor Abilities or in other words… more feautures with the same objective has Armor Abilities (Giving more support and ways to the players)
>
> What if killcams “don’t know the name of this system” are just an evolution of the previous Halo’s theathre mode (taked to multiplayer, letting us know about the situation right in the moment)
>
> yes they may sound and have the same objective has COD perks, killcams, loudouts etc…
>
> But this is 343’s Halo, and maybe they add this feautures has an evolution of what previous Halo’s already add and not copying COD.
> These are very distinctive games, both good at their own way.
>
> So its possible that we can call Halo 4 new feautures has an “evolution” and not CODish things?
>
> I don’t wanna start a game war, just hate to see people complaining about a game that I believe that its gonna bring back Halo 3’s or 1 huge sucess level has unique games.
>
> And again, this might had no sense to you but anyway, just wanted to give it a try at sharing my thoughts…

This is the first ''support features that heavily resemble cods" thread that I can actually somewhat support. You make sense, but unfortunately just like in science if you discover something on your own a day after someone else discovered the same thing you dont get the credit. Still wish I could borrow your rose colored glasses though…

Also I would argue Halo “evolved” with Halo CE, Anything beyond CE needed only minor tweaks to established norms. I don’t think we needed to gut certain features and replace them with something else. Just remember that just liek in nature, not all evolution is good, infact most of it is bad. Very few mutations ever lead to a more fit animal compared to the many that kill.

Wish we had more science majors working at 343…

6

> > Sorry if what I writed makes no sense to you (this is my first topic of this type “Discussions”) and I’m not perfect on English too… :stuck_out_tongue:
> >
> > And if Halo 4 is a evolution of the previous Halos?
> >
> > I see topics talking about “Halo is copying COD with perks, killcams, etc” and they may be right or WRONG!
> >
> > I don’t think that…
> >
> > What if the costumizable loudouts are just an evolution of the loudout system in Halo Reach.(allowing costumizable loudouts in multiplayer)
> >
> > What if ordenance drops are just an evolution of Weapon drop from Reach’s firefight (taked even further to multiplayer)
> >
> > What if the tactical packages and support upgrades are just an evolution of Reach Armor Abilities or in other words… more feautures with the same objective has Armor Abilities (Giving more support and ways to the players)
> >
> > What if killcams “don’t know the name of this system” are just an evolution of the previous Halo’s theathre mode (taked to multiplayer, letting us know about the situation right in the moment)
> >
> > yes they may sound and have the same objective has COD perks, killcams, loudouts etc…
> >
> > But this is 343’s Halo, and maybe they add this feautures has an evolution of what previous Halo’s already add and not copying COD.
> > These are very distinctive games, both good at their own way.
> >
> > So its possible that we can call Halo 4 new feautures has an “evolution” and not CODish things?
> >
> > I don’t wanna start a game war, just hate to see people complaining about a game that I believe that its gonna bring back Halo 3’s or 1 huge sucess level has unique games.
> >
> > And again, this might had no sense to you but anyway, just wanted to give it a try at sharing my thoughts…
>
> This is the first ''support features that heavily resemble cods" thread that I can actually somewhat support. You make sense, but unfortunately just like in science if you discover something on your own a day after someone else discovered the same thing you dont get the credit. Still wish I could borrow your rose colored glasses though…
>
>
>
> Also I would argue Halo “evolved” with Halo CE, Anything beyond CE needed only minor tweaks to established norms. I don’t think we needed to gut certain features and replace them with something else. Just remember that just liek in nature, not all evolution is good, infact most of it is bad. Very few mutations ever lead to a more fit animal compared to the many that kill.
>
>
>
>
> Wish we had more science majors working at 343…

well in Halo 4 the evolution seems to be good.
From what I heard most of the people who complained about the new additions etc, saying that it isn’t halo, after they playing they changed their mind.

And from what it looks the game looks fantastic. Unfortnatly I got spoiled, I watched some parts and gameplay of the campaign. A the story telling, gameplay, visuals, everything looks and feels Halo all over again. I would say it Halo combat evolved 360 version because it feels like it felt 11 years ago. I also watched the ending and its O.O . the game seems perfect until now, I will sure buy it and enjoy it :slight_smile:

Multiplayer looks super too. Can’t wait to get addicted to it!

7

> > Sorry if what I writed makes no sense to you (this is my first topic of this type “Discussions”) and I’m not perfect on English too… :stuck_out_tongue:
> >
> > And if Halo 4 is a evolution of the previous Halos?
> >
> > I see topics talking about “Halo is copying COD with perks, killcams, etc” and they may be right or WRONG!
> >
> > I don’t think that…
> >
> > What if the costumizable loudouts are just an evolution of the loudout system in Halo Reach.(allowing costumizable loudouts in multiplayer)
> >
> > What if ordenance drops are just an evolution of Weapon drop from Reach’s firefight (taked even further to multiplayer)
> >
> > What if the tactical packages and support upgrades are just an evolution of Reach Armor Abilities or in other words… more feautures with the same objective has Armor Abilities (Giving more support and ways to the players)
> >
> > What if killcams “don’t know the name of this system” are just an evolution of the previous Halo’s theathre mode (taked to multiplayer, letting us know about the situation right in the moment)
> >
> > yes they may sound and have the same objective has COD perks, killcams, loudouts etc…
> >
> > But this is 343’s Halo, and maybe they add this feautures has an evolution of what previous Halo’s already add and not copying COD.
> > These are very distinctive games, both good at their own way.
> >
> > So its possible that we can call Halo 4 new feautures has an “evolution” and not CODish things?
> >
> > I don’t wanna start a game war, just hate to see people complaining about a game that I believe that its gonna bring back Halo 3’s or 1 huge sucess level has unique games.
> >
> > And again, this might had no sense to you but anyway, just wanted to give it a try at sharing my thoughts…
>
> This is the first ''support features that heavily resemble cods" thread that I can actually somewhat support. You make sense, but unfortunately just like in science if you discover something on your own a day after someone else discovered the same thing you dont get the credit. Still wish I could borrow your rose colored glasses though…
>
>
>
> Also I would argue Halo “evolved” with Halo CE, Anything beyond CE needed only minor tweaks to established norms. I don’t think we needed to gut certain features and replace them with something else. Just remember that just liek in nature, not all evolution is good, infact most of it is bad. Very few mutations ever lead to a more fit animal compared to the many that kill.
>
>
>
>
> Wish we had more science majors working at 343…

well in Halo 4 the evolution seems to be good.
From what I heard most of the people who complained about the new additions etc, saying that it isn’t halo, after they playing they changed their mind.

And from what it looks the game looks fantastic. Unfortnatly I got spoiled, I watched some parts and gameplay of the campaign. A the story telling, gameplay, visuals, everything looks and feels Halo all over again. I would say it Halo combat evolved 360 version because it feels like it felt 11 years ago. I also watched the ending and its O.O . the game seems perfect until now, I will sure buy it and enjoy it :slight_smile:

Multiplayer looks super too. Can’t wait to get addicted to it!

8

double post -_- sorry …

9

Sucks you got spoiled :confused: But I completely agree with you. 343i knows what theyre up against and they know some people will say “Oh it’s a copy of COD”. But they’re bringing in more areas to where you can customize your spartan to fit your own personality instead of just giving you a spartan and being told to go kill people.

Some things about Halo 4 I’m definitly sure I’ll like, while some other I may not be so sure. But in the end, 343i is basically a Halo community making the Halo game! They know what it’s like to truly be a fan, and will do what the community for the most part will love.

To all of those guys saying its looks like a crappy game that plays like COD…just wait until November 6th :wink: