Analyzing...docking, that can't be right....

Games Halo 5: Guardians
1

NO, NO, NO, chief isn’t a traitor he… Locke can’t be right… so many good thing’s but… I’m gonna be honest I cried… I can’t take this, to many questions not enough answerers… Chief is human…is he,

Lets analyze this trailer:

First the description it reads, There are two sides to every story, basically telling us…something about chief’s reason’s

Now as soon as Locke steps out Infinity can be seen in the top right…on fire.

All hail the hero, sounds like Locke takes this ‘hero’ thing to seriously.

as soon as it goes into the visor you can see Locke has low ammo indicating Locke has been in a firefight.

And not as you, is that the real chief?

And realy the magnum is H4 AND FLOATS to Locke’s hand!

Chief has a bullet hole in the armor but no UNSC or Covy weapon can do that

2

The hole is either hardlight or plasma scorch. It has embers and it Is fairly deep…

3

You cried? Seriously?

4

> 2533274795233660;3:
> You cried? Seriously?

Chief is my fav…don’t judge…please?

5

> 2533274887515153;2:
> The hole is either hardlight or plasma scorch. It has embers and it Is fairly deep…

Big bird from e3? Only thing I could think of doing all that damage to the city and infinity, plus the orange like burns on chief.

6

> 2533274993843450;4:
> > 2533274795233660;3:
> > You cried? Seriously?
>
>
>
> Chief is my fav…don’t judge…please?

I wouldn’t worry. The Halo 4 ads weren’t canon and showed the chief in perilous conditions too. I doubt these ads are canon or even featured in Halo 5 campaign .

7

> 2533274795233660;6:
> > 2533274993843450;4:
> > > 2533274795233660;3:
> > > You cried? Seriously?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Chief is my fav…don’t judge…please?
>
>
> I wouldn’t worry. The Halo 4 ads weren’t canon and showed the chief in perilous conditions too. I doubt these ads are canon or even featured in Halo 5 campaign .

still…I don’t like the fact he is in a bad position anyway’s.

8

I have a conclusion, this is the first cutscene the other one is next:

In the h2a cutscene Arbiter say’s

Arby: You are hunter yes, a seeker of thing’s.

Locke: That’s not the official job title, but it’s close enough

Arby: And now you hunt other spartans?

Locke: I’m not as much hunting other spartan’s as I am hunting the spartan.

Arby: You seek.

Locke: One one seven

Arby: I was not told the identity of your prey.
Locke: That is why I am sharing it with you now, were talking about trust after all.
…
Arby: He was indeed my enemy but in time I named him ally, even friend

Arby: The events which forged this bond are…complicated
________________________________________________________________________________
A hunter yes, a seeker of thing’s:
Implying Locke is a hunter, find and kill, but the word seeker imply’s finder.

Not the official JOB title: Someone put him up to this, it wasn’t just him, but it also deny’s one of the hunter or seeker, which one is he?

Arby say’s seek again find not kill but then say’s prey?

We were talking about trust after all, what does this have to do with the situation? is he implying chief?

Ally even freind, Arby won’t let Locke kill Chief that’s a given, if that was the situation Arby would kill Locke on site.

What event’s are complicated? Prophet’s were liars, ally with humans, Chief happened to be human so I fought with him. What’s so complicated, is there more to it?

So, Arby has multiple impressions of Locke’s intention’s, Such as killing or finding, but this conflict’s with the new trailers, is he really trying to kill chief, or find him, who put him up to it? Was it ONI, or something else? REMEMBER, this is the reclaimer saga, implying this is’nt the only game to feature this conflict, we might not even se any answers in h5 just more questions. The next cutscene is next.