I’m well aware of socio-religious power disparity.
I come from a mixed background where I was not raised Christian for years and was subject directly to persecution due to that fact.
But if you are gonna take a stance please have the integrity to do so without making caveats.
Thats the least you can be asked to do.
We can’t make a rule for ourselves and not apply it to others.
One can’t demand respect they do not wish to grant others.
You are quite literally saying a person should expect more respect proportionally to their perceived sense of marginalisation.
Ridiculous.
The fact is religious iconography is inextricably tied to commerce. Always has been.
The team is not a single race or belief.
If they are truly offended thats fine but then they should consider the context.
By all means label me as problematic and assume my perspective it puts you on equal footing as myself in that regard.
It isn’t even the name of the god ultimately so there’s very little cause to be offended.
Further trivialising real problematic acts of appropriating. By treating something so incredibly inoffensive as legitimate you give your opponents more opportunity to dismiss valid concerns.
Its got a lore based logic and is clearly part of the halo 5 inspiration. Where the heroes where osiris and is likely due to the MISCONCEPTION inpu had the head of a jackal and not of a wolf. Thus tying it to an enemy species in game. Clearly no ill intent.
Its no more offensive as buying an inpu statue in an Egyptian museum or airport.
As a peice of iconography it has long outgrown the source material and has became symbolic of things beyond its roots in ancient Egyptian theology.
That is a fact of symbolism it grows and adapts with culture.
Its like the guy fawkes mask or a cross or swastika.
Ownership of symbolism is only going to cause issues.
People are entitled to interpret
The entire history of the god and the act of worship in itself has evolved drastically.
They are entitled to their feelings but no person is entitled to dictating representation and interpretation.
There is no embalming or preservation of belief it is a living entity and will permeat through time and cultures as it always has and it is not going to do anyone any favours if they allow it to offend them when iconography is adopted and iterated.
Edit: the Gow example isn’t bad at all. 1. Theres nothing disrespectful about the use of anubis in halo. 2. It is thematically tied to the source mythology in more than one way. 3. GOW4 is the eight game in the franchise and not all were as dedicated to accuracy.
EDIT: (side note)
@Magabro5382 have you played asuras wrath? It takes Shinto and hindu elements and goes full sci fi god of war. Its a sort of misunderstood title imo. Ises contextual control scheme to make a highly cinematic QTE based game that aside needing dlc for the ending is something worth checking out.