Aim Assist is currently way too strong

Ok, on paper it MAY seem as an advantage but in real world, as in-game it is not the case. The controller with it’s accuracy buff has the advantage over MnK as a whole.

Why do you idiots create a problem out of nothing? 10 years ago no one in their right mind would’ve said “I’m losing to controllers because keyboard and mouse is less efficient way”. Have you regressed so much you create a problem out of this? If it’s so easy to use a controller why don’t you pick it up and be a Pro (and get paid $$$ in the process)? I mean obviously Scump is a CoD professional simply because of the aim assist.

Also one thing is what I don’t understand why you are even playing the ranked at all? There is no incentive to play it anyway. If you want to prove your digital e--Yoink!- is large, maybe you want to rub your ego that way?

Obviously for this issue 343 needs to implement an input based matchmaking. I don’t like playing against PC players either because the game is f2p and people cheat.

3 Likes

What a solid argument, lol.

Ha, exactly. You’d think they’d be too embarrassed to admit that controller users are beating them.

Hmm, so what you are saying is that you don’t like playing against people that also have artificial unfair advantages? That’s… ironic.

You’ll have to explain the irony there, because i don’t see it.

I’m not surprised. :rofl:

Oh, i see. You can’t.

Sure dude, whatever you have to tell yourself to get through the day.

1 Like

I mean you haven’t so i’m going to assume you can’t. Otherwise it would be pretty simple to explain, no?

It’s very simple to explain… that’s why I don’t need to explain it. It’s not my fault if you can’t see the obvious irony.

D_dawgy is saying people on Controllers are cheating.

Not quite, but you’re very close. You got the gist of it.

That’s a pathetic strawman. Imagine comparing aimbot, ESP, wall hacks, and other types of illegal 3rd-party modifications to aim assist, a 1st-party tool whose only purpose is to slightly help with aiming.

3 Likes

Strawman? Maybe. Pathetic Strawman? That’s a bit redundant don’t you think?

I’ll admit it’s an exaggerated comparison, but it gets the point across.

He can’t explain it because he doesn’t fully understand what he’s saying.

Just because you can’t understand what I’m posting doesn’t mean I don’t understand what I’m posting.

Lol you obviously struggle with the concept. Otherwise you wouldn’t be using an argument the equivalent of:

“I know what (word) means, i just don’t want to tell you”

The one that kids use when they obviously don’t know what they’re talking about.

1 Like

Sorry, you were arguing semantics. Maybe “irony” wasn’t the best word to use. “Hypocritical” would have probably been better.

1 Like

Just stop @D_dawgy , you’re making a fool of yourself.