With Halo Wars backwards compatible, I’ve been playing a lot of multiplayer. 4/5 times, someone will quit at the start of the match, and ruin the game for everyone. I hope Creative Assembly adds something to Halo Wars 2 that temporarily bans you if you quit a match early. If you have to go somewhere that’s your own fault, don’t start a game if you know you can’t finish it.
> 2533274842997033;1:
> With Halo Wars backwards compatible, I’ve been playing a lot of multiplayer. 4/5 times, someone will quit at the start of the match, and ruin the game for everyone. I hope Creative Assembly adds something to Halo Wars 2 that temporarily bans you if you quit a match early. If you have to go somewhere that’s your own fault, don’t start a game if you know you can’t finish it.
lol theirs nothing more frustrating then playing a 3v3 with one less teammate you literally can’t win and might as well leave. I’m running into the same issue but i honestly think we are going to have to tolerate this nonsense and accept the truth. Its a shame that’s why i only play 1v1 or teams. they better address this issue or theirs no way in hell i’m buying halo wars 2
Totally agree bro I hate when people quit its like dont play then.
You don’t need a ban for that… Just don’t let them start another match till that one ends.
> 2533274830812781;4:
> You don’t need a ban for that… Just don’t let them start another match till that one ends.
That’s technically still a temporary ban
this was a discussion i had about this a while back no i don’t expect you to revive this but just take a look at some of the ideas posted
or fix the system, because it’s got to suck if you randomly get kicked from the server, which happens to me in Halo 5(this includes custom games when I’m the host)
General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
> 2533274795515722;8:
> General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
Ouch. So you’re bad at playing and don’t know how to counter a rush is what you’re saying?
Obviously the rusher is having a good game. He just won.
It’s an RTS. The idea is to put pressure on your opponents to destabilize them, not let them build up and attack as they please. Hence, rushing. Attacking before your enemy is ready.
> 2533274809541057;9:
> > 2533274795515722;8:
> > General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
>
>
> Ouch. So you’re bad at playing and don’t know how to counter a rush is what you’re saying?
>
> Obviously the rusher is having a good game. He just won.
>
> It’s an RTS. The idea is to put pressure on your opponents to destabilize them, not let them build up and attack as they please. Hence, rushing. Attacking before your enemy is ready.
I enjoy long games. Not short ones. And one loss will not make me care one bit. 3 v3 and all are generals that play covenant… Screw that I self destruct my base and let the hog die so they don’t get the points
Hmm. people.
O_O uhh i remember playing back in the day wed be on the verge of winning hen someone quits and we lose soo not cool
> 2533274795515722;8:
> General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
You should be banned from halo wars forever doing that is what ruins the community
> 2533274795515722;10:
> > 2533274809541057;9:
> > > 2533274795515722;8:
> > > General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
> >
> >
> > Ouch. So you’re bad at playing and don’t know how to counter a rush is what you’re saying?
> >
> > Obviously the rusher is having a good game. He just won.
> >
> > It’s an RTS. The idea is to put pressure on your opponents to destabilize them, not let them build up and attack as they please. Hence, rushing. Attacking before your enemy is ready.
>
>
> I enjoy long games. Not short ones. And one loss will not make me care one bit. 3 v3 and all are generals that play covenant… Screw that I self destruct my base and let the hog die so they don’t get the points
learn ways to counter. oh wait, USE STRATEGY
it would be nice to actually complete a proper online game
> 2533274795515722;10:
> > 2533274809541057;9:
> > > 2533274795515722;8:
> > > General + covenant = not playing since he’s most likely going to rush. I’d rather find a end game than play with a rusher that does not know how to have a good game
> >
> >
> > Ouch. So you’re bad at playing and don’t know how to counter a rush is what you’re saying?
> >
> > Obviously the rusher is having a good game. He just won.
> >
> > It’s an RTS. The idea is to put pressure on your opponents to destabilize them, not let them build up and attack as they please. Hence, rushing. Attacking before your enemy is ready.
>
>
> I enjoy long games. Not short ones. And one loss will not make me care one bit. 3 v3 and all are generals that play covenant… Screw that I self destruct my base and let the hog die so they don’t get the points
Enjoys long games, so he quits instantly… Awesome guy right here.
If you are clearly going to lose the game then quitting should be an option, who wants to sit around for 5 minutes watching your final base being pulled apart with no hope of recovery? RTS games can also go on for HOURS. If I have something more important than video games to do, i should be able to quit without fear of a ban. Also when you are paired with two recruits against 3 generals, who wants to wait around to get destroyed? thats the main reason people quit at the start.
Yes if it is player based quitting and no for the other half for connection quitting