Or at the very least a different form of voting that I’ll outline here:
I suggest, that in SEARCH PREFERENCES, you are allowed to input which gametypes you prefer.
You can enter your top three preferred gametypes OR label the available gametypes in most preferred to least preferred, and in the search algorithms, you’d be matched with those with similar gametype preferences.
Action Sack is quite varied, so this would solve the high amount of quitters leaving gametypes they don’t like. And, unlike voting, everyone wouldn’t be swayed by popular consensus and instead would have a HIGHER CHANCE of playing what they wanted to play.
Thoughts?
Or maybe a veto option. Until then, I guess people will just have to quit the build in the pregame lobby.
Seems like a pretty good idea to prioritize certain game types. The only downside is that people would rage if they ever got something they ever got something they didn’t prioritize.
I was thinking the same when I got put on mantis breakout four games running. Can’t even quit because of the ban hammer 
A veto system at least… I like your idea but I also like the randomness. I hate playing the same map 3+ times in a row… unless its the mongoose horn blowing tournament of death. 
agreed. tired of minotaurs every other match in a “random” playlist
“if you don’t like breakout, face your ban from quitting” or: stop the unfair “Banhammer” . Action sack seem to be filled with bias Breakout features that we really didn’t want, but it is now shoved down our throats in the same manner as the REQ system. while 343 listens to our cries for mercy, we continuously suffer from the chokehold without being able to tap-out. at some point someone has to say “enough is enough” less this entire game becomes something we hate.