I understand this question has been asked alot but i want to see what you guys think. Do you think there should be Armor ablities in Halo 4. Now that MC has landed on a new world(or old) and it obviousley had forrunners on it thier might be new AAs if their is AAs. now if you dont prefer AAs(like me) then your probably looking to see the return of the powerups and possibly new ones. so what do you guys say AAs yay or nay
Don’t care. Just want something new and fresh please.
No.
No.
AA’s are one of the main things that ruined Reach.
No. Although they do make for some really fun gametypes they ruin map balance in a regular match. I do think they should have equipment like in Halo 3 though.
No.
No
> No. Although they do make for some really fun gametypes they ruin map balance in a regular match. I do think they should have equipment like in Halo 3 though.
maybe you should think about which one to use to gain an advantage?? u can switch them everytime you respawn.
Nope.
Should there be? No.
Will there be? Yes, unfortunately.
> Should there be? No.
>
> <mark>Will there be? Yes, unfortunately.</mark>
Where does this claim come from?
Try this video and see if this answers your question.
no just keep sprint
No
Hell I don’t even want equipment in Halo 4
Id say the chances of AA’s coming back is very low since it looks like 9/10 people(if these forums are anything to go by) want them out. me personly would perfer if they were out but dont care that much.
Though I do enjoy them, I rather have something new since this is a new trilogy. But if 343 decides to give AA’s another try, I hope that their balanced and leave them as pick ups.
Yes Halo 4 should have them. Most people equate AAs to the exact AAs in Reach. Although they are well implemented in reach all AAs serve are to be an outlet to build new mechanics around the game.
If you say no more AAs in Halo 4 you do not want any more NEW MECHANICS in Halo 4 as well, which is obviously a ridicules thing to say.
At what point do you say to not add any more guns to Halo?
NO.
Even if I did like AA’s, it wouldn’t make any sense. They were only in a prequel. Having them in a sequel to Halo 3 would just be stupid.
> NO.
>
> Even if I did like AA’s, it wouldn’t make any sense. They were only in a prequel. Having them in a sequel to Halo 3 would just be stupid.
Anything can be made up so that some feature, weapon, armor, etc. could fit in the canon. For example: Sgt. Johnson holding a Battle Rifle on the cover of Halo: Contact Harvest even though the weapon started being used in 2552. Or more recently (even though not yet explained), how the Chief got new armor in the teaser trailer.