I recently finished the Forerunner trilogy and have been thinking about the exchange between the Iso-Didact and the Primordial (at the end of Primordium). The section i am most interested in:
> “Deified! You were monsters set upon destroying all who would assume the Mantle.”
> “It was long ago decided. Forerunners will never bear the Mantle.”
> “Decided how?”
> “Through long study. The decision is final. Humans will replace you. Humans will be tested next.”
> Was the Primordial giving me a message of hope? Doom for our enemies… ascendency and triumph for humanity?
> “Is that to be our punishment?” the Didact asked, his tone subdued-dangerous.
> “It is the way of those who seek out the truth of the Mantle. Humans will rise again in arrogance and defiance. The Flood will return when they are ripe - and bring them unity.”
>
> …
> “Forerunners will fail as you have failed before. Humans will rise. Whether they will also fail has not been decided”
This dialogue got me thinking, but i don’t really like the conclusions i have drawn. I suppose the following theory is one that i hope will turn out to be false, at least i really don’t want to see the wider Halo universe head in this direction, even though i’m afraid that it will.
What if the flood and the conflicts humanity faces are all part of the Precursors’ plan? We already know that the flood deliberately did not destroy humanity so it could turn on the Forerunners. Here the Primordial is explicitly saying that humanity needs to be “tested” by the flood, and that the Forerunners failed that test. Was it part of the Precursors’ plan that the Forerunners be removed from the galaxy through the Halo rings? We know that when the Forerunners rose up against the Precursors, they didn’t react, or fight back at all. Perhaps they knew and accepted that it was a necessary part of the plan?
We have geas already established, and we have a species of unbelievable sophistication that takes whatever shape it wants, and can control the behavior of an immense biological super-weapon. Perhaps they also planted geas of their own in the forerunners and pushed them towards building the Halos, and pushed the librarian towards nurturing humanity to ‘reclaim’ the forerunner legacy. Kind of like Foundation meets the bible.
The biblicial connections are obvious - Ark, Flood, Covenant, supreme beings being disappointed with their creations and wanting to start over from a clean slate. We might see the librarian as being a kind of godly messenger - fulfilling the ultimate will of the Precursors. The Ur-Didact is the ultimate evil, because he wants the forerunners to return and not have the human beings ‘reclaim’ what belongs to his race.
The strongest evidence against this theory that i can think of is the later statements from the gravemind, about how the flood wants everything to suffer for eternity, but perhaps there is even a geas for the flood, and the graveminds are not fully conscious of the overall plan.
I don’t want this to be the direction they are taking Halo though - because it is fundamentally a religious story and it removes all agency from all of the characters. We already have the librarian saying that she ‘programmed’ the ultimate evolution of humanity, including John-117, and Cortana, and their relationship together - are they simply puppets then? Is every living thing in the galaxy a puppet? Everything would be pre-ordained by perfect beings, and regardless of what plot points the writers come up with, how non-sensical or illogical, it can be explained away as part of the “wisdom of the precursors”. Frankly i prefer tragedy, character flaws, and unpleasant consequences for bad decisions. I would much prefer to see a race of star-builders become victim to their weaknesses, and unleash horror upon the whole galaxy thanks to their rage and bitterness, driven by the shock of realizing they weren’t so perfect. Not just because ‘it’s a test’.
I think anyone who’s argued with a religious fundamentalist about the meaning of death and suffering in the world, only to be answered with “It’s just God’s plan” would agree that this would be a bad direction story-wise. Of course its a fairly extreme theory, and i welcome any proof against it