I always thought the gunfighter magnum was a cool gun (and it is IMO) since the weapon tuning update, the weapon has felt a bit sluggish for what it’s worth so I propose a new magnum variant for the gunfighter magnum… Gunfighter Magnum with Stabilization Jets > REQ level 3 with less recoil and significantly better bullet grouping.
What do you guys think?
Pretty certain nobody wants any more useless weapon attachment REQs
> 2535440120215345;2:
> Pretty certain nobody wants any more useless weapon attachment REQs
Whoever said no to new magnum variants is beyond me.
It’s kinda hard to think of Magnum variants that would be redundant or function identically to other weapons. I’m fine with what we have.
> 2535429593088083;4:
> It’s kinda hard to think of Magnum variants that would be redundant or function identically to other weapons. I’m fine with what we have.
A dual-weildable one would be nice.
With kinetic bolts would look cool or a bayoneted tac mag at a higher req would look sick
> 2533274907200114;5:
> > 2535429593088083;4:
> > It’s kinda hard to think of Magnum variants that would be redundant or function identically to other weapons. I’m fine with what we have.
>
> A dual-weildable one would be nice.
Maybe. Throwing in some potential lore, holding two pistols at once could probably put too much strain on Smart-Scope, therefore you can only hipfire with them. Just my thoughts.
> 2535429593088083;7:
> > 2533274907200114;5:
> > > 2535429593088083;4:
> > > It’s kinda hard to think of Magnum variants that would be redundant or function identically to other weapons. I’m fine with what we have.
> >
> > A dual-weildable one would be nice.
>
> Maybe. Throwing in some potential lore, holding two pistols at once could probably put too much strain on Smart-Scope, therefore you can only hipfire with them. Just my thoughts.
Thats what I was thinking yeah. They’re not very accurate but they’re fast firing like the gunfighter and you can put rounds down range fast enough to really do some damage
> 2533274871396650;3:
> > 2535440120215345;2:
> > Pretty certain nobody wants any more useless weapon attachment REQs
>
> Whoever said no to new magnum variants is beyond me.
and why is that, can you not accept other peoples opinions?
Person 1: I like this
Person 2: I don’t like this
Person 1: You are beyond my understanding
Personally, I think we’re good on Magnum variants. The dual-wield holds some appeal; but ultimately I think it would cause more problems than it’s worth.
> 2533274850734574;9:
> > 2533274871396650;3:
> > > 2535440120215345;2:
> > > Pretty certain nobody wants any more useless weapon attachment REQs
> >
> > Whoever said no to new magnum variants is beyond me.
>
> and why is that, can you not accept other peoples opinions?
I never said I didn’t like their opinions, more or less I respect whatever their opinions are.