Yes. And there’s more than one older Halo with grunt birthday party.
It’s amazing how much effort you’re going through in vain to distract from the initial point, which was that Halo 3 had grunt birthday party. Like, not only are you wrong about grammar, but you’re tacitly conceding that you can’t challenge my first statement.
No, that’s not a correction. My statement is perfectly fine without the use of “or.” I notice that you conveniently left out the example I used since it absolutely blasts your entire grammar conversation into the dirt.
Here’s another one:
“Older Halos have such iconic lines as ‘Wake me when you need me’ and ‘I know what the ladies like.’”
One line from Halo 3, one line from Halo 2. The sentence works just fine.
WHAT?! Holy crap. The coordinating conjunction “and” works just fine when the subject is “older Halos.”
“Halo Reach” is not the subject of the sentence, “Older Halos” is the subject. We talk like this all the time.
Here’s one more example:
“My friends have the worst fashion sense. Last night when we got together I saw an ugly striped shirt and a garish polka dot shirt.”
I wouldn’t need to use “or” in this sentence at all, despite each friend only wearing one shirt. I can come up with random examples of this all day long. You have to either be trolling, or you just can’t admit that you forgot grunt birthday party existed outside of Halo Reach.
Then what level of saturation objectively makes something unbelievable? Because I was seeing Hayabusa in every other match during Halo 3. It was probably the most popular armor by a longshot.
That’s not what I asked. I’m not asking about older Halos. I’m asking about Halo Infinite. Since Halo Infinite’s multiplayer is canon, are you upset at the flaming helmets being in the lore now?
Holy crap you actually did miss the point.
It’s the same level of explanation for the Hayabusa armor. Did you just not understand what you read?
I didn’t comment on how believable the lore was. I said the level of justification is the same, which is that in both cases of Hayabusa and Yoroi, the devs just handwaved the justification with the most basic explanation.
Here’s a question to exemplify why they’re both actually stupid: Why would the Japanese model their spartan helmets after a character from a Japanese action game from the 21st century?
Except I’m not getting whipped. This dude misread something I said about “older Halos” and is grasping at straws trying to come up with some absolutely stupid explanation about the proper use of “and.” Which is funny because I’ve then used examples that he conveniently ignores. This is hardly a thrashing.
Actually, you blocked me because you started a misinformed topic and I replied to it, but you’d made an echo chamber thread and you didn’t actually want someone to explain the concern you had. You blocked me because you just didn’t want to hear a dissenting opinion, despite me being pretty level-headed in my post.
very true
