.
NEW POLICY. STOP FAIL.
dont pair up a team of FOUR RANDOMS versus a TEAM OF FOUR.
No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
> .
> NEW POLICY. STOP FAIL.
>
> dont pair up a team of FOUR RANDOMS versus a TEAM OF FOUR.
This should be obvious. Dont know why it is this way.
The result is ALWAYS the same. Team of four matches four randoms. Two of the randoms are pretty good, but then the other two will be absolute garbage giving the two good players NO chance in hell of winning. Inevitably someone quits or all players quit. It really makes MM FRUSTRATING.
Please Don’t do this in H4.
> No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
This exactly, in Halo 4, have a search option that allows you to ONLY search for parties and restrict yourself, when I am playing with friends, I don’t want to wait to play games.
> No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
um. you could still get paired up with 2 parties of 2, or 1 party of 2 and 2 randoms.
and how fun is it, exactly, to be a party of 4 against 4 uncoordinated randoms? not fun at all IMO. who the heck likes decimating a team that cant even compete, or even come close to competing? i sure as heck dont enjoy it.
> No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
I would wait the extra 30seconds needed.
> No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
Only if there are few players in that playlist, just like Squad Slayer and Arena.
I cant find any harm in adding it for Team Slayer.
> > No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
>
> Only if there are few players in that playlist, just like Squad Slayer and Arena.
> I cant find any harm in adding it for Team Slayer.
and objective, and the anni playlists 
the rest of the playlists i could care less about.
> > No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
>
> um. you could still get paired up with 2 parties of 2, or 1 party of 2 and 2 randoms.
>
> and how fun is it, exactly, to be a party of 4 against 4 uncoordinated randoms? not fun at all IMO. who the heck likes decimating a team that cant even compete, or even come close to competing? i sure as heck dont enjoy it.
Then it really can only happen in Team Slayer, and not in any other playlist.
^Should happen in any playlist that wants to be taken seriously. Snipers, MLG, TS, Double Team etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. To not have it in H4 would be a joke.
> ^Should happen in any playlist that wants to be taken seriously. Snipers, MLG, TS, Double Team etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. To not have it in H4 would be a joke.
DT does do it.
> > > No. It would kill search times for people who want to search with their friends.
> >
> > Only if there are few players in that playlist, just like Squad Slayer and Arena.
> > I cant find any harm in adding it for Team Slayer.
>
> and objective, and the anni playlists
>
> the rest of the playlists i could care less about.
Sure they could add party for most playlists. But it will kill the search times for say Team Objectives. It has about 500 players while Squad slayer has about 1300-1700k at peek and searching with a party in Squad takes forever.
> DT does do it.
Oh really? Did not know that. The question is why aren’t the rest of the playlists doing the same thing?
> > ^Should happen in any playlist that wants to be taken seriously. Snipers, MLG, TS, Double Team etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. To not have it in H4 would be a joke.
>
> DT does do it.
DT…?
> ^Should happen in any playlist that wants to be taken seriously. Snipers, MLG, TS, Double Team etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. To not have it in H4 would be a joke.
No, it should only be in playlists that have a Rank, not meaningless Social playlists.
^Those playlists should be ranked. Not Arena ranked, ranked.
@Haunted DT=Double Team.
> > DT does do it.
>
> Oh really? Did not know that. The question is why aren’t the rest of the playlists doing the same thing?
Yup they didn’t use to but they do now. It makes for better games.
> ^Those playlists should be ranked. Not Arena ranked, ranked.
>
> @Haunted DT=Double Team.
oh, well if pharm is saying that double team matches teams against teams and randoms against randoms then he’s wrong, i’ve gone into that playlist with a friend and been matched against randoms quite a few times, though, it does appear that people mostly search with a friend in that playlist.
at the moment, only squad slayer matches teams against teams and randoms against randoms, for the most part.
> > ^Should happen in any playlist that wants to be taken seriously. Snipers, MLG, TS, Double Team etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. To not have it in H4 would be a joke.
>
> No, it should only be in playlists that have a Rank, not meaningless Social playlists.
Yeah true that. But seeing as the social part allso use Matchmaking you would atleast expect it to have party search when it’s matching players. It’s not like the social part of Reach is Player Matches aka quit and join mid games, where facing a full party of players can give players a option to quit and find another game if they dont want to play against full party.
> > ^Those playlists should be ranked. Not Arena ranked, ranked.
> >
> > @Haunted DT=Double Team.
>
> oh, well if pharm is saying that double team matches teams against teams and randoms against randoms then he’s wrong, i’ve gone into that playlist with a friend and been matched against randoms quite a few times, though, it does appear that people mostly search with a friend in that playlist.
>
> at the moment, only squad slayer matches teams against teams and randoms against randoms, for the most part.
Have you played recently ? I promise its how I say it is. Just try it today.