I’m still enjoying Halo 5 though lol.
> 2535409489305717;191:
> The Halo 5 Hunters aren’t that hard. If you uses your fire team and give them the Hydra or something heavy will take those things out, even on legendary.
> 2535460540145054;203:
> > 2535409489305717;191:
> > The Halo 5 Hunters aren’t that hard. If you uses your fire team and give them the Hydra or something heavy will take those things out, even on legendary.
>
>
> Wrong thread? (https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/6e35355aecdf4fd0acdaee3cc4156fd4/topics/halo-5-guradians---bad-changes-1---hunters/96063cde-ad6c-464d-8860-44fff2457d1a/posts)
No not the wrong thread, I’m saying that they are not hard to kill if you use teamwork.
> 2535409489305717;204:
> > 2535460540145054;203:
> > > 2535409489305717;191:
> > > The Halo 5 Hunters aren’t that hard. If you uses your fire team and give them the Hydra or something heavy will take those things out, even on legendary.
> >
> >
> > Wrong thread? (https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/6e35355aecdf4fd0acdaee3cc4156fd4/topics/halo-5-guradians---bad-changes-1---hunters/96063cde-ad6c-464d-8860-44fff2457d1a/posts)
>
>
> No not the wrong thread, I’m saying that they are not hard to kill if you use teamwork.
This isn’t the hunter thread. Unless it was intentional in which case I apologize.
> 2535460540145054;205:
> > 2535409489305717;204:
> > > 2535460540145054;203:
> > > > 2535409489305717;191:
> > > > The Halo 5 Hunters aren’t that hard. If you uses your fire team and give them the Hydra or something heavy will take those things out, even on legendary.
> > >
> > >
> > > Wrong thread? (https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/6e35355aecdf4fd0acdaee3cc4156fd4/topics/halo-5-guradians---bad-changes-1---hunters/96063cde-ad6c-464d-8860-44fff2457d1a/posts)
> >
> >
> > No not the wrong thread, I’m saying that they are not hard to kill if you use teamwork.
>
>
> This isn’t the hunter thread. Unless it was intentional in which case I apologize.
That’s ok, I’m just saying there not hard to kill unless you use the AI as shields. But like I said before, Make less marksmen and shoot inaccurate most of the time that aren’t direct hits and make them move more.
> 2535409489305717;206:
> > 2535460540145054;205:
> > > 2535409489305717;204:
> > > > 2535460540145054;203:
> > > > > 2535409489305717;191:
> > > > > The Halo 5 Hunters aren’t that hard. If you uses your fire team and give them the Hydra or something heavy will take those things out, even on legendary.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wrong thread? (https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/forums/6e35355aecdf4fd0acdaee3cc4156fd4/topics/halo-5-guradians---bad-changes-1---hunters/96063cde-ad6c-464d-8860-44fff2457d1a/posts)
> > >
> > >
> > > No not the wrong thread, I’m saying that they are not hard to kill if you use teamwork.
> >
> >
> > This isn’t the hunter thread. Unless it was intentional in which case I apologize.
>
>
> That’s ok, I’m just saying there not hard to kill unless you use the AI as shields. But like I said before, Make less marksmen and shoot inaccurate most of the time that aren’t direct hits and make them move more.
I do know if you were confused what about the Hunters but both threads do fit into this topic as this will make Halo 6 better.
> 2533274942042829;3:
> 343 learns off their mistakes, I’m sure it will be fine
That’s what I think
I thought this was a great game , I see it as the Halo 2 of the forerunner saga, this is great build up for what is yet to come
if halo 6 is gonna be good, it’ll have to have a more engaging story, unlike halo 4 and 5, which failed to engage with the player in a “classic halo feel”.
The only reason Halo 5 is good is because of forge. Customization, the REQ system, Graphics, story, it all sucks. Halo is dying and it CAN be saved but it looks like it wont be.
> 2535409489305717;201:
> > 2533274824735712;200:
> > > 2535409489305717;197:
> > > > 2533274831850844;196:
> > > > > 2533274942042829;12:
> > > > > > 2533274840503992;11:
> > > > > > Halo 6 better be good, or else 343 will be dragged before the High Council and branded with the Mark of Shame.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A new writer is needed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I do miss Joe Staten’s emotive flare, the man could tell a damn good story. Halo 2 was probably the best Halo to date for its campaign, and the story wasn’t even complete.
> > >
> > >
> > > it wasn’t, wow.
> >
> >
> > Halo 2 was essentially remade in less than a year, with most of the original campaign cut out. I want to say they had to drop like… 70% of what they were planning.
>
>
> So we had 14 missions (2 being a cinematic and a walkthrough) so that means by theory that would’ve have 28 missions= 42 missions by theory. I know there was a forerunner tank going to be there.
Bungie was originally planning that Halo 2 would stop at the battle of Voi. Truth would enter the portal and the entire sequence on the Ark would take place in Halo 3.
I think the trailer with the masterchief in the obivan dress which I liked this looked so sick (that’s also my Xbox avatar) in the desert and the guardian coming out was kind of a Halo 6 Trailer
> 2535467910883490;210:
> if halo 6 is gonna be good, it’ll have to have a more engaging story, unlike halo 4 and 5, which failed to engage with the player in a “classic halo feel”.
I don’t know if I liked the story of halo 5 yet i will know it after the story of halo 6 because Halo 5 end was so open
They do learn from their mistakes and aren’t afraid to take constructive criticism and utilize it in order to improve their product as shown in the changes we have seen in halo 5 within the last few months. I hope the keep the spartan abilities in halo 6 aND the same balanced weapons. I can also hope they don’t change the req system. This req system is amazing and I think they have got it down pat.
I’ll be getting h6 but not the collectors edition this time. And i will ignore the campaign altogether and go straight to MP. Just like I do with cod
I’m running out of patience. I want 6 to be good because I don’t want to wait for even later games. If Halo 6 isn’t good I’m probably going to give up on 343’s Halo. I still love Bungie’s though.
I’ll probably see how it ends on YouTube or something. I lost interest. I don’t like it. I don’t like how the game I grew up with is thrown and tossed around like another COD clone wannabe
I’m probably the only one that really loved 343’s Halo games more than Bungie’s. H4 was awesome and it’s campaign really shined. H5 has the best multiplayer ever (IMO), the campaign could’ve been better but I don’t despise it. I’m hoping for a stellar H6 campaign and another addicting multiplayer experience.
Halo 5 is not a bad game by any means. If Halo 6 will be better that would just be amazing. Especially if it will be on the NextBox (Scorpio)
> 2533274942042829;3:
> 343 learns off their mistakes, I’m sure it will be fine
Uh, no they don’t? They saw how badly the community received Armor Abilities in Reach, so why did they feel the need to implement them back in Halo 4 and now ‘Spartan Abilities’ into in Halo 5? Shoulder Barge is literally an exact replica of the Striker Titan’s Shoulder Charge from Destiny, and Ground Pound is a less powerful Fist of Havoc. Sprint and ADS is in other games like Call of Duty and Battlefield. Halo has always been known as an innovator, not a conformist. Not to mention there is no Classic Slayer or Slayer Pro playlist that allows Halo veterans to feel at home. Every Halo gametype has all these new abilities that I never hear too much praise about.
Reach sold around ten million copies, and Halo 3 sold almost thirteen million. Bungie clearly saw that classical Halo games sold better, and attributed Reach’s non-perfect sales to Armor Abilities and the lack of Master Chief. Why couldn’t 343 realize that players liked more traditional Halos?
I think the main reason that Halo’s sales are where they are now is not only because of cheap and noob-friendly gameplay mechanics that 343 is so fond of, but also this generation’s take on competitive gaming. When I played Halo 2 the first time, I could care less if I won or not. I didn’t know what a K/D was and I could have cared less at the time. I only liked playing with friends and having a good time. Nowadays, I’m betting kids would rather not play multiplayer PvP games at all if they don’t have a chance to win. Every Halo 5 playlist is filled to the rim with tryhards and Warzone is full of Achilles farmers. If Halo stayed true to its original formula and didn’t stray too much from it, I’m sure it would have sales around Reach’s level and attract the fanbase it lost with Halo 4. CS:GO is one of the most-played PC games currently, mainly because it has never changed; It’s been the same for years.
Maybe 343 should actually stop focusing on microtransactions and more Gold pack payment options, and give the community things they actually want. When Memories of Reach came out, everyone thought the Legendary vehicle was a Falcon, but it was the Phaeton Helios… that didn’t relate to Reach remotely. Shouldn’t they have learned the community feverishly wanted something, and give it to them? Apparently not. To me, 343 is the pinnacle of what’s wrong with the gaming industry. They’re a feckless, money hungry, irresponsible company and could care less about the community’s suggestions or Halo’s lore. I don’t have a feeling that the one million Halo fans that have stuck around are going to be around for much longer while being treated with such negligence and disrespect. Halo was once the unrivaled shooter on the market, and now, thanks to 343’s inability to ‘learn’, we’re here. Halo 5 has (maybe) one and a half million sales and a more-than-generous estimated player population of twenty thousand. I feel ignominious to say I’m a Halo player, the game’s reputation has been tarnished beyond the point of repair, I think. Too bad 343 has had to be so negligent.