Actually they don’t.
anyone who wants to complain that they do is acting like a little child in the store who thinks that their parent “owes” them half the candy store.stop acting like privileged “people” that throw a hissy fit when you don’t get what you want.
Stop having an entitlement mentality for once. ( lol not that anyone in here would even know what that is )
These forums have been a circus and are still a circus even after Frankie explained that there won’t be “random” weapon Respawns and that instant Respawns are limited to certain Gametypes.No one wants to read your threads ( except other people who are like minded ) about how Halo 4 is going to suck.
If you want to voice that you don’t like something about the game do so in a productive way that would move the franchise forward if you were working on the game instead of making a thread that makes ME want to ask if it’s time for you to have your diaper changed.
I have yet to hear any good alternatives to the changes being made in halo 4. people like to suggest what it shouldn’t be but they themselves have no clue how it should be.
Anyway guy’s it’s time to shape up the forums.
stop crying and whining about how the game is going to suck. I’m tired of all the negativity. Start making threads that contribute ideas that can add to what is already being made by 343i. Embrace the system.
don’t like perks ? try making up some ideas as to what perks can be good for halo
Don’t like Gameplay mechanics ? suggest some mechanics of your own
don’t like no beta ? go make your own space shooter game with a beta
FYI - A beta is for testing. IF the developer needs to test the game on public networks then they run a beta. Sometimes they have the time and resources for one and sometimes they don’t. Some companies run beta’s to build hype for their game if it needs it and sometimes they do it to give players a taste of the gameplay for tweaking. 343i doesn’t need to do that as they already have the resources otherwise to fulfill those roles.
Remember this: A beta is like a stranger that walks up to you on the street every once and awhile and gives you $20.00. They don’t owe you that money but it is really cool that they did give it to you those 2 times before. The fact that you expect $20.00 this year is pathetic.
Mischievous title, even though I agree
Hopefully they do give us a beta or an early demo
> They might give us a demo 
OR you could just wait till the game comes out in a few months.
since when has their been a Halo demo pre-launch ?
Remember its a new developer for halo that could change.
Enters to laugh at kids who feel entitled
Leaves sadfaced
You’re right, this thread is far more productive and mature than that of the people who are worried about the game.
> You’re right, this thread is far more productive and mature than that of the people who are worried about the game.
Can’t tell if sarcasm or correct.
> You’re right, this thread is far more productive and mature than that of the people who are worried about the game.
Actually it is.
I provided suggestions for the forum to move forward.
I’m guessing you are probably one of the people that
called out by it and can’t deal with it.
My condolences for your loss.
A beta would be good, fix any bugs that they didn’t know about. But, I’m guessing they on’t wanna have one because they want the game to be a surprise.
> A beta would be good, fix any bugs that they didn’t know about. But, I’m guessing they on’t wanna have one because they want the game to be a surprise.
Yep. Plus, they’ll get more negative feedback for unfinished content in a game that won’t come out for a few more months.
> A beta would be good, fix any bugs that they didn’t know about. But, I’m guessing they on’t wanna have one because they want the game to be a surprise.
That, and it costs time and recources.
And they can’t ask the testers direct questions.
And most of the feedback would be from nostalgia blinded fanboys.
And the only feedback they would ever get would be from the people who weren’t happy with something, meaning they change things 90% of people thought was fine and enjoyed.
And most of the feedback would be people screaming “Remove nao” when it’s too late to change.
Its called constructie criticism. Granted 90% of threads are made by and populated of annoying, self-entitled whiners who don’t know what they want and there are usually tons of threads pertaining to the same topic, but constructive criticism is necessary for the betterment of the game.
343i is not always going to make decisions that make the fans happy, thats why the forums are a good place to give our constructive criticism to help make the game as good as it can be.
> > A beta would be good, fix any bugs that they didn’t know about. But, I’m guessing they on’t wanna have one because they want the game to be a surprise.
>
> That, and it costs time and recources.
> And they can’t ask the testers direct questions.
> And most of the feedback would be from nostalgia blinded fanboys.
> And the only feedback they would ever get would be from the people who weren’t happy with something, meaning they change things 90% of people thought was fine and enjoyed.
> And most of the feedback would be people screaming “Remove nao” when it’s too late to change.
you hit it right on the nail.
given the way the forum acted once the info was released I don’t think bungie wants to deal with little kids who couldn’t provide them with the data they need to fix actualy bugs.
they would just be getting all sorts of BS about stuff that didn’t need to be changed because it was just a matter of preference and not an actual technical problem