i love the way bungie made halo. it truly was a master piece!
343i has changed it and made it into a different style of halo.
master cheif never needed any of those fancy gadgets to win his fights, but i guess spartan 4’s do.
343i did a great job with the campaign. it looked great and was fun playing through it. it would’ve have been nice for us if they add more areas to let us roam around the campaign for exploration, but that’s fine. maybe next time.
though i liked halo 4, it’s not the same halo i grew up with. 343i has changed halo 4 into a typical fps, but is coated with halo theme.
i give halo 4 gameplay experience a 8/10. it’s a fun fps game.
but i give halo 4 “halo game” a 3/10 because it’s really not a halo game. it just has the halo title and a few things that remained “halo”.
AHH crap. Someone already beat me to it? Oh well. Point still stands.
But as per your reply: Halo Reach did NOT play like Halo in the slightest. The DMR ruined spawn weapons forever. AAs were absolutely garbage. Slow movement speed was god awful. And the Bloom… THE BLOOM!
> Bungie made Halo Reach. Your point is invalid.
>
> AHH crap. Someone already beat me to it? Oh well. Point still stands.
>
> But as per your reply: Halo Reach did NOT play like Halo in the slightest. The DMR ruined spawn weapons forever. AAs were absolutely garbage. Slow movement speed was god awful. And the Bloom… THE BLOOM!
you probably didn’t see my post before you posted but yes, like i said… bad aa’s and bloom. i also agree that the dmr sucks. i wish it never exists.
Hey, I in Reach quit loadouts, bloom, adapt maps and a few changes more and have a good Halo. I playing MLG and Snipers yet and enjoy.
But how many things need quit or change in H4?
A good game (old Halo) can evolve, must evolve. But cant change or not self game…
And yes, i want a H3.1 with H4 graphics and Reach net filter.
> Wow, When reach came out, Nothing but bashing it, Now some guys say its the best
>
> <mark>I cant wait till Halo 5 comes out and the community says how bad it sucked and that 4 was great</mark>
halo 4 is a great game, it’s just not a halo game. my point still stands even 10 years from now.
> > > > > Bungie made Reach. Your argument is invalid.
> > > >
> > > > Halo: Reach was Bungie’s best game.
> > >
> > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
> > >
> > > HAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
> > >
> > > OH MAN!!! THAT WAS GREAT!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!
> > >
> > > AAHHH I’m crying man!!! You’re hilarious!
> >
> > Immature Yoink! hunting.
> >
> > New personal record: 5 minutes
>
> Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t realize I was the one that said “Halo: Reach was Bungie’s best game.”
>
> I’m pretty sure Trolling is more immature than finding a troll funny.
Yes, because I was obviously joking… I’ve been playing Halo since the first day Halo: CE released and I like Halo: Reach more than the first trilogy. Well, Halo 2 is my favourite Campaign, but overall, Halo: Reach is a better game.
> > Wow, When reach came out, Nothing but bashing it, Now some guys say its the best
> >
> > <mark>I cant wait till Halo 5 comes out and the community says how bad it sucked and that 4 was great</mark>
>
> halo 4 is a great game, it’s just not a halo game. my point still stands even 10 years from now.
Clearly it is a “Halo” game, Says so on the box
What just because they added AA’s and weapons it doesnt make it a halo game?
I never understood why people want a new game thats basically the same as previous titles
Thats basically what Madden does
If Im going to pay 60 dollars for a new game, it better have a new feel