343,this

thats what a forum member just posted in another thread,and cant say it better,its exactly like i think about it

> No Bloom,
> No AA’s,
> No Classes,
> No Sprint,
> True Skill like in Halo 3 is a YES!

and thats classic halo for me,why not bulid upon halo 3? i dont get why 343 is going in reachs direction

they should make halo 4 with halo 3 in mind,bulid upon halo 3

evolve equipment and think about new things,not sprint or things like that and for the sake of halo bring back pickable camo and not as an AAs

OP?

It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.

> It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.

thats what i mean,of course it needs to evolve and i dont want a halo 3.5 as well,but 343 should build upon halo 3,right now they are building it upon reach and since its a sequel to halo 3 they should build it upon halo 3

and i think they are doing it wrong

> It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.

And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.

> > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
>
> And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.

How do you know it is gamebreaking?

Lend me your copy soon k?

> thats what a forum member just posted in another thread,and cant say it better,its exactly like i think about it
>
>
>
> > No Bloom,
> > No AA’s,
> > No Classes,
> > No Sprint,
> > True Skill like in Halo 3 is a YES!
>
> and thats classic halo for me,why not bulid upon halo 3? i dont get why 343 is going in reachs direction
>
> they should make halo 4 with halo 3 in mind,bulid upon halo 3
>
> evolve equipment and think about new things,not sprint or things like that and for the sake of halo bring back pickable camo and not as an AAs

Take your original Xbox and Halo CE and go play LAN at a friend’s house. Or go play Reach Classic, where they took out Bloom, AA’s Sprint, have the pistol as powerful…that’s the closest you will get to classic H:CE. I want a new game that expands and adds to it not the same garble that is passed on like CoD does. Do I like all the changes…no. Does it frustrate me…yes and a lot. But guess what I get over it and try to adapt and try to update my skill.

Like I said enough with this bring back Classic Halo…not going to happen. 343i wants to expand on the game like every other studio (except for the CoD studios they seem to make the game always the same) when they make sequels of games. It amazes me how people think games will stay the same and little changes will be made to perfect it. If people don’t want change then why do people clamor for better graphics. It’s unnecessary if they just want to play the game like previous games so having it visually appleasing is unneeded since they only care about game play. So if that’s the case go play the original xbox and Halo:CE over LAN.

> > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> >
> > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
>
> How do you know it is gamebreaking?
>
> Lend me your copy soon k?

Have you played Halo before?

> > > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> > >
> > > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
> >
> > How do you know it is gamebreaking?
> >
> > Lend me your copy soon k?
>
> Have you played Halo before?

Well i wouldn’t be here if i hadn’t lol.

To get something totally unique and different, I’d rather them build off of core halo than just classic. That’s what they did for Reach and now Halo 4.

> > > > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> > > >
> > > > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
> > >
> > > How do you know it is gamebreaking?
> > >
> > > Lend me your copy soon k?
> >
> > Have you played Halo before?
>
> Well i wouldn’t be here if i hadn’t lol.

Then you should know that Armor Abilities are game breaking bad decision forgivers and loadouts are just plain unnecessary. Forerunner Vision no matter what it does can’t be good. It’s vision it most likely has to mark something and it probably helps the awareness of bad players it’s like 343 just can’t help themselves but to make Halo which is was a competitive game that took skill dumber and dumber.

Explain to me why they should be in the game. Because we need to give 343i a chance?

> > > > > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> > > > >
> > > > > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
> > > >
> > > > How do you know it is gamebreaking?
> > > >
> > > > Lend me your copy soon k?
> > >
> > > Have you played Halo before?
> >
> > Well i wouldn’t be here if i hadn’t lol.
>
> Then you should know that Armor Abilities are game breaking bad decision forgivers and loadouts are just plain unnecessary. Forerunner Vision no matter what it does can’t be good. It’s vision it most likely has to mark something and it probably helps the awareness of bad players it’s like 343 just can’t help themselves but to make Halo which is was a competitive game that took skill dumber and dumber.
>
> Explain to me why they should be in the game.

Yes of course because i’m sure 343 are just going to bring in the armour abilities the way they are without balancing them in some way.

Halo 4 is not a game made to satisfy your nostalgic needs for Halo 2/3. It is it’s own game, meant to create nostalga for when you are older and look back on it. Halo 4 is not supposed to be looked back on the game that tried to be like Halo2/3 that didn’t do it as well as Halo 2/3 did.

Halo 4 will be what it will and it is a great step forward from Reach. Stop comparing it to other Halo games and complaining that you want it to be like older games. Let it be it’s own unique Halo game. That is what it needs for success.

Halo 4 is not halo combat evolved…

Halo 4 is combat evolved “again” duh
other wise…there would just stop at the stone age… :slight_smile:

> To get something totally unique and different, I’d rather them build off of core halo than just classic. That’s what they did for Reach and now Halo 4.

It’s called Halo 4, not Halo Wish It Could Be Like Halo: CE.

If you don’t like the changes then play Halo 3 or even better play your original Xbox and play Halo: CE LAN style. People are afraid or change or they hate it b/c it’s not what your use too. Guess what get out of your comfort zone. Guess what you know there were some changes in Halo: Reach I didn’t like and did it frustrate me…yes like having a guy sprint away after shooting him or armor locking and dying by one of his teammates. But guess what I learned to adapt and change my playing style to fit the game, and by doing so I feel I am a better player.

So I agree build off the core and don’t go classic like Mambaa says.

> > > > > > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you know it is gamebreaking?
> > > > >
> > > > > Lend me your copy soon k?
> > > >
> > > > Have you played Halo before?
> > >
> > > Well i wouldn’t be here if i hadn’t lol.
> >
> > Then you should know that Armor Abilities are game breaking bad decision forgivers and loadouts are just plain unnecessary. Forerunner Vision no matter what it does can’t be good. It’s vision it most likely has to mark something and it probably helps the awareness of bad players it’s like 343 just can’t help themselves but to make Halo which is was a competitive game that took skill dumber and dumber.
> >
> > Explain to me why they should be in the game.
>
> Yes of course because i’m sure 343 are just going to bring in the armour abilities the way they are without balancing them in some way.

They are. Just new ones probably, can’t wait to see what they are…
We already start with sprint, Jetpack is back and we have forerunner vision.

> > thats what a forum member just posted in another thread,and cant say it better,its exactly like i think about it
> >
> >
> >
> > > No Bloom,
> > > No AA’s,
> > > No Classes,
> > > No Sprint,
> > > True Skill like in Halo 3 is a YES!
> >
> > and thats classic halo for me,why not bulid upon halo 3? i dont get why 343 is going in reachs direction
> >
> > they should make halo 4 with halo 3 in mind,bulid upon halo 3
> >
> > evolve equipment and think about new things,not sprint or things like that and for the sake of halo bring back pickable camo and not as an AAs
>
> Take your original Xbox and Halo CE and go play LAN at a friend’s house. Or go play Reach Classic, where they took out Bloom, AA’s Sprint, have the pistol as powerful…that’s the closest you will get to classic H:CE. I want a new game that expands and adds to it not the same garble that is passed on like CoD does. Do I like all the changes…no. Does it frustrate me…yes and a lot. But guess what I get over it and try to adapt and try to update my skill.
>
> Like I said enough with this bring back Classic Halo…not going to happen. 343i wants to expand on the game like every other studio (except for the CoD studios they seem to make the game always the same) when they make sequels of games. It amazes me how people think games will stay the same and little changes will be made to perfect it. If people don’t want change then why do people clamor for better graphics. It’s unnecessary if they just want to play the game like previous games so having it visually appleasing is unneeded since they only care about game play. So if that’s the case go play the original xbox and Halo:CE over LAN.

dude if you dont want classic halo go play battlefield or gears of war

Halo 4 is a sequel. It isn’t a new IP. Of course it should be similar to Halo 3.

Was Halo 3 just Halo 2.5? Or even Halo just CE.5?

You don’t need to uproot what makes Halo Halo in order to “evolve.”
You guys don’t want it to be the same “like CoD,” but you want everything from CoD in it.

> > > > > > > > It needs to evolve just like anytthing else. I don’t want Halo 3.5.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And I don’t want a cheap mixture of every other game on the market, I want Halo. Halo can evolve without adding gamebreaking features stop accepting every single feature put in the game in the name of change and don’t wait until the game is released and it’s to late to do anything to get rid of a gamebreaking feature tell 343i what should and shouldn’t be in Halo. i.e. A.A., Loadouts and forerunner vision.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you know it is gamebreaking?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lend me your copy soon k?
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you played Halo before?
> > > >
> > > > Well i wouldn’t be here if i hadn’t lol.
> > >
> > > Then you should know that Armor Abilities are game breaking bad decision forgivers and loadouts are just plain unnecessary. Forerunner Vision no matter what it does can’t be good. It’s vision it most likely has to mark something and it probably helps the awareness of bad players it’s like 343 just can’t help themselves but to make Halo which is was a competitive game that took skill dumber and dumber.
> > >
> > > Explain to me why they should be in the game.
> >
> > Yes of course because i’m sure 343 are just going to bring in the armour abilities the way they are without balancing them in some way.
>
> They are. Just new ones probably, can’t wait to see what they are…
> We already start with sprint, Jetpack is back and we have forerunner vision.

And we all know how well Sprint and Jetpack went in Reach. Now you have both at the same time.

> > thats what a forum member just posted in another thread,and cant say it better,its exactly like i think about it
> >
> >
> >
> > > No Bloom,
> > > No AA’s,
> > > No Classes,
> > > No Sprint,
> > > True Skill like in Halo 3 is a YES!
> >
> > and thats classic halo for me,why not bulid upon halo 3? i dont get why 343 is going in reachs direction
> >
> > they should make halo 4 with halo 3 in mind,bulid upon halo 3
> >
> > evolve equipment and think about new things,not sprint or things like that and for the sake of halo bring back pickable camo and not as an AAs
>
> Take your original Xbox and Halo CE and go play LAN at a friend’s house. Or go play Reach Classic, where they took out Bloom, AA’s Sprint, have the pistol as powerful…that’s the closest you will get to classic H:CE. I want a new game that expands and adds to it not the same garble that is passed on like CoD does. Do I like all the changes…no. Does it frustrate me…yes and a lot. But guess what I get over it and try to adapt and try to update my skill.
>
> Like I said enough with this bring back Classic Halo…not going to happen. 343i wants to expand on the game like every other studio (except for the CoD studios they seem to make the game always the same) when they make sequels of games. It amazes me how people think games will stay the same and little changes will be made to perfect it. If people don’t want change then why do people clamor for better graphics. It’s unnecessary if they just want to play the game like previous games so having it visually appleasing is unneeded since they only care about game play. So if that’s the case go play the original xbox and Halo:CE over LAN.

That’s exactly what I want -Yoink-. I wouldn’t mind if every year or two Halo just got “polished”. People like you who want Space call of duty need to take their yoink on over to Call of yoinking Duty and stop trying to change Halo.