Ever since 343 took over halo franchise it has gone downhill. I like halo 5 but now I feel it’s just like call of duty. If I wanted to get shot through walls I’d just play cod.I kno there will always be lag but it seems as of late that it’s has been too consistent to the point I’d rather just not play. Idk if they don’t have enough servers or wat but hopefully they do something about it fast. Seems that bungie had a much better handle on things then 343 does.Also the maps they redid are complete garbage. I’d rather pay for something good then get somethin crap for free.
Sorry they called no take backs.
I hear you, your points are valid, but Bungie dropped Halo like it was an unwanted child at an orphanage. They released Reach, fixed nothing, added more BS and then left it at 343’s doorstep.
Not saying 343 can’t do better, but I don’t want the franchise going back to someone who didn’t want it.
No if 343 does that im quiting halo…you guus dont understand… Bungie isnt them anymore. They fired all the old halo guys to make destiny they got new managment and all. They are just greedy. If they took halo back instead of us getting free maps, armour and so on it qould be like $20 everytime so nope
So basically you want 343 to sell something they themselves don’t own (Microsoft does), to someone who made the game that started taking it in a different direction (Reach), didn’t respond to any of the feedback or make any of the desired changes, left the franchise to make something else that was completely lackluster, has lost much of the key talent that steered the Halo series back in the day and had a pretty strong dislike of expanding the franchise beyond the main games?
Look, I’ve given a fair amount of criticism to 343, but at least they seem to be trying to take feedback on board. Halo 5’s gameplay was based almost entirely around criticism of Halo 4 and Reach, their Forge mode was built based on the desires of the community, and many of the things added and changed in the updates have come from player feedback.
Does anyone pay attention to what they did with destiny? I’ve seen 10x more hate about that game than halo 5. I didn’t mind it but I like halo 5 much more.
> 2533274880633045;2:
> Sorry they called no take backs.
lmao. This was awesome.
On topic: Bungie is now with Activision and has done an atrocious job with Destiny. I played it for a while and the levels are uninteresting, the story is bizarrely missing, the multiplayer is unbalanced, and it’s a non-stop grind-fest. They peaked with Halo 3 and went downhill from there. Remember, they were the ones who brought in weapon bloom, ridiculous armor abilities, and ground Halo multiplayer gamespeed to a near-halt. Even if this was an option, I’d say “no way.”
Halo is 343’s toy now, and they can break it if they want to. Not that I think that’s what they’re doing, but let’s just put this question of ownership to bed once and for all.
Bungie is no longer what one day was…
Bungie is no longer Bungie.
._.
> 2533274848539555;5:
> So basically you want 343 to sell something they themselves don’t own (Microsoft does), to someone who made the game that started taking it in a different direction (Reach), didn’t respond to any of the feedback or make any of the desired changes, left the franchise to make something else that was completely lackluster, has lost much of the key talent that steered the Halo series back in the day and had a pretty strong dislike of expanding the franchise beyond the main games?
>
> Look, I’ve given a fair amount of criticism to 343, but at least they seem to be trying to take feedback on board. Halo 5’s gameplay was based almost entirely around criticism of Halo 4 and Reach, their Forge mode was built based on the desires of the community, and many of the things added and changed in the updates have come from player feedback.
Doubles and Snipers???
> 2535409187083780;10:
> > 2533274848539555;5:
> > So basically you want 343 to sell something they themselves don’t own (Microsoft does), to someone who made the game that started taking it in a different direction (Reach), didn’t respond to any of the feedback or make any of the desired changes, left the franchise to make something else that was completely lackluster, has lost much of the key talent that steered the Halo series back in the day and had a pretty strong dislike of expanding the franchise beyond the main games?
> >
> > Look, I’ve given a fair amount of criticism to 343, but at least they seem to be trying to take feedback on board. Halo 5’s gameplay was based almost entirely around criticism of Halo 4 and Reach, their Forge mode was built based on the desires of the community, and many of the things added and changed in the updates have come from player feedback.
>
>
> Doubles and Snipers???
Because cherry picking examples negates everything else.