343 Please for the love of all that is holy, finish the game before you release it next time. Stop running this trial and error, let me emphasize error because I don’t think I am the only one who gets irritated by the lack of completion. When you release a game mode, make sure it is fixed. When you release content, patch the bugs. I may be ranting but I am tired of playing a game that isn’t complete.
> 2533274821596262;1:
> 343 Please for the love of all that is holy, finish the game before you release it next time. Stop running this trial and error, let me emphasize error because I don’t think I am the only one who gets irritated by the lack of competition. When you release a game mode, make sure it is fixed. When you release content, patch the bugs. I may be ranting but I am tired of playing a game that isn’t complete.
We definitely have more fps options then to wait for a year to finish the game… while the game is still super small compared to the other games.
> 2533274821596262;1:
> 343 Please for the love of all that is holy, finish the game before you release it next time. Stop running this trial and error, let me emphasize error because I don’t think I am the only one who gets irritated by the lack of completion. When you release a game mode, make sure it is fixed. When you release content, patch the bugs. I may be ranting but I am tired of playing a game that isn’t complete.
Trust me, you’re not the only one who isn’t irritated
<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please refrain from making non-constructive posts.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
> 2535465266874213;4:
> Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
Is this really whats considered putting effort into comments now?
> 2533274821596262;5:
> > 2535465266874213;4:
> > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
>
>
> Is this really whats considered putting effort into comments now?
Shucks, you sure got me!
You’re just proving my point.
Fix MCC first!
> 2535465266874213;6:
> > 2533274821596262;5:
> > > 2535465266874213;4:
> > > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
> >
> >
> > Is this really whats considered putting effort into comments now?
>
>
> Shucks, you sure got me!
> You’re just proving my point.
Alright kid, settle down. You’re getting into an argument on a gaming website
LNG says that 343 and Microsoft know that they screwed up the development and that halo 6 will be a lot smoother, but he also said that he isn’t sure if his source is being optimistic and trying to cheer him up or if he actually knows.
> 2535455681930574;9:
> LNG says that 343 and Microsoft know that they screwed up the development and that halo 6 will be a lot smoother, but he also said that he isn’t sure if his source is being optimistic and trying to cheer him up or if he actually knows.
Watch some of his stuff last night, had some good info. I’d argue for optimism. Halo 4 had issues, MCC was a joke. Halo 5 should be the charm. It should not take a game company 3 titles to figure out how to make a game. I know LNG talked about the issues with MCC and how it was meant to be H2A but it isnt really good enough. Though often microsoft gets what they say. If 343 is going to be successful they need to balls up and stick to their plan and stop changing everything late, LNG said that the issues theyve had are last minute changes but that isn’t an excuse, they need to float a plan they like and stick to it. Develop it wholly for 2-3 years and put out a polished, AAA product.
> 2535465266874213;4:
> Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
Halo 5 was empty on release, and we don’t want it to happen again. If you are to blind to see that, then I don’t know what to tell you other than shut up, because the reality is that people who are okay with getting less than what we got 10 years ago hurt the community, and are the toxic ones we’d be better off without.
You and people like you are the reason devs get a free pass with releasing $80 betas.
> 2535414791138154;10:
> > 2535455681930574;9:
> > LNG says that 343 and Microsoft know that they screwed up the development and that halo 6 will be a lot smoother, but he also said that he isn’t sure if his source is being optimistic and trying to cheer him up or if he actually knows.
>
>
> Watch some of his stuff last night, had some good info. I’d argue for optimism. Halo 4 had issues, MCC was a joke. Halo 5 should be the charm. It should not take a game company 3 titles to figure out how to make a game. I know LNG talked about the issues with MCC and how it was meant to be H2A but it isnt really good enough. Though often microsoft gets what they say. If 343 is going to be successful they need to balls up and stick to their plan and stop changing everything late, LNG said that the issues theyve had are last minute changes but that isn’t an excuse, they need to float a plan they like and stick to it. Develop it wholly for 2-3 years and put out a polished, AAA product.
I don’t count mcc as their official second entry, because they just bumped up the graphics on older games. It really wasn’t a bad game, but because they were rushed, it was filled with bugs. I hope that LNG’s source is telling the truth about how halo 6’s development is going to be smoother. I feel that 343 have learned a lot from halo 4 and 5, and I have hope that it will be great.
> 2535455681930574;12:
> > 2535414791138154;10:
> > > 2535455681930574;9:
> > > LNG says that 343 and Microsoft know that they screwed up the development and that halo 6 will be a lot smoother, but he also said that he isn’t sure if his source is being optimistic and trying to cheer him up or if he actually knows.
> >
> >
> > Watch some of his stuff last night, had some good info. I’d argue for optimism. Halo 4 had issues, MCC was a joke. Halo 5 should be the charm. It should not take a game company 3 titles to figure out how to make a game. I know LNG talked about the issues with MCC and how it was meant to be H2A but it isnt really good enough. Though often microsoft gets what they say. If 343 is going to be successful they need to balls up and stick to their plan and stop changing everything late, LNG said that the issues theyve had are last minute changes but that isn’t an excuse, they need to float a plan they like and stick to it. Develop it wholly for 2-3 years and put out a polished, AAA product.
>
>
> I don’t count mcc as their official second entry, because they just bumped up the graphics on older games. It really wasn’t a bad game, but because they were rushed, it was filled with bugs. I hope that LNG’s source is telling the truth about how halo 6’s development is going to be smoother. I feel that 343 have learned a lot from halo 4 and 5, and I have hope that it will be great.
I understand that but you’d think for something relatively simple it wouldn’t be that hard? MCC’s release was not bugged, it was plagued. As LNG said, MCC is up there as a benchmark for a bad game release. I really do hope theyve learned a thing or two.
> 2533274970658419;11:
> > 2535465266874213;4:
> > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
>
>
> Halo 5 was empty on release, and we don’t want it to happen again.
So what relevance does that have 8 months after release?
I’m fine with that considering Halo 4’s multiplayer was absolute garbage, it’s better than the alternative.
Seriously, was this thread -Yoink- out of a timewarp or something? it’s useless.
> 2535465266874213;14:
> > 2533274970658419;11:
> > > 2535465266874213;4:
> > > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
> >
> >
> > Halo 5 was empty on release, and we don’t want it to happen again.
>
>
> So what relevance does that have 8 months after release?
> I’m fine with that considering Halo 4’s multiplayer was absolute garbage, it’s better than the alternative.
>
> Seriously, was this thread -Yoink- out of a timewarp or something? it’s useless.
What relevance?
No one wants it to happen again. Halo 4 sucked, MCC was broken, and Halo 5 was starving. Letting them know this isn’t acceptable from a AAA studio handpicked and backed by a $68.6 Billion company is feedback.
> 2533274970658419;15:
> > 2535465266874213;14:
> > > 2533274970658419;11:
> > > > 2535465266874213;4:
> > > > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
> > >
> > >
> > > Halo 5 was empty on release, and we don’t want it to happen again.
> >
> >
> > So what relevance does that have 8 months after release?
> > I’m fine with that considering Halo 4’s multiplayer was absolute garbage, it’s better than the alternative.
> >
> > Seriously, was this thread -Yoink- out of a timewarp or something? it’s useless.
>
>
> What relevance?
> No one wants it to happen again. Halo 4 sucked, MCC was broken, and Halo 5 was starving. Letting them know this isn’t acceptable from a AAA studio handpicked and backed by a $100 company is feedback.
well there’s our problem! They only had a budget of $100! 
Welcome to the future of gaming.
> 2533274821596262;1:
> 343 Please for the love of all that is holy, finish the game before you release it next time. Stop running this trial and error, let me emphasize error because I don’t think I am the only one who gets irritated by the lack of completion. When you release a game mode, make sure it is fixed. When you release content, patch the bugs. I may be ranting but I am tired of playing a game that isn’t complete.
lol, you make it sound like it would be easy developing a complete bug free game.
> 2533274886490718;18:
> > 2533274821596262;1:
> > 343 Please for the love of all that is holy, finish the game before you release it next time. Stop running this trial and error, let me emphasize error because I don’t think I am the only one who gets irritated by the lack of completion. When you release a game mode, make sure it is fixed. When you release content, patch the bugs. I may be ranting but I am tired of playing a game that isn’t complete.
>
>
> lol, you make it sound like it would be easy developing a complete bug free game.
Easy? Probably not. As I’ve said in countless other threads, more has been done with less. Remember Reach? Ya know, the game with more content than any other Halo game and it all worked on day one?
> 2533274970658419;11:
> > 2535465266874213;4:
> > Is this really what’s considered putting effort into posting, now?
>
>
> Halo 5 was empty on release, and we don’t want it to happen again. If you are to blind to see that, then I don’t know what to tell you other than shut up, because the reality is that people who are okay with getting less than what we got 10 years ago hurt the community, and are the toxic ones we’d be better off without.
>
> You and people like you are the reason devs get a free pass with releasing $80 betas.
It’s sad, but you’re right: Halo 5 is just a $60 beta.