Do you agree with this?
I don’t.
Its roots as I see them is a fair start, map control/team orientated arena game. Which is exacty how it plays so when it comes to gameplay yes i agree
This is a terrible post
Lol, ok that was pretty funny, but I agree with you though.
> 2533274912317447;3:
> This is a terrible post
Ironic. But seriously though, it’s a discussion related to halo 5. Discussing the question in the op. Do you agree with that statement, why or why not?
343 Made it relevant to the MLG circuit thats about it if they want to make it Halo again get back to doing some worth while custom games/multiplayer play-lists.
In terms of core gameplay mechanics, much more so than Halo 4 or Reach, but in terms of content and amount of content, it’s the furthest, most unappreciated deviation yet.
> 2533274840624875;2:
> Its roots as I see them is a fair start, map control/team orientated arena game. Which is exacty how it plays so when it comes to gameplay yes i agree
I have to agree, h4 and reach kind of killed the halo feel but I see h5 fixing those mistakes. Only thing h5 needs is more maps and playlists. Would help too if it were not the worst campaign in halo history too imo.
well they did, and then only gave us half of the roots
> 2533274902775751;9:
> well they did, and then only gave us half of the roots
This.
They directed the series toward its roots by stripping out the loadouts and ordinance drops, but that only takes it about halfway toward the series roots. They stopped short before stripping out the sprinting and the armor/Spartan abilities.