343 are bad at launching games, but

I hope that they can deliver the game that Infinite was supposed to be, before everyone is gone.

1 Like

Other than BTB and melee registration, broken how, exactly?

1 Like

You can defend Halo Infinite without pulling a ā€œthis is fineā€ meme.

1 Like

That’s part of why I’m voicing concerns. I think the core gameplay is great. I think in time Infinite will be my favorite Halo. Their team does seem honest and concerned from what I’ve heard. And a 10 year cycle is more than enough to improve. If I didn’t think there was solid core gameplay, it I thought the devs didn’t care, why would I say a word? It’d be pointless. They did a good job, and I know it’ll get better. Still pretty rough right now though.

1 Like

I’m not saying what their doing is ā€œjust okā€. Its not. I’m no 343 bootlicker that will always trust them no matter how many times they mess up.

I don’t like to complain or give negativity, but I guess that’s unavoidable now.

1 Like

Agreed 100%. I hate how instead of just making a game, companies try to patch it all instead of making a working game to begin with.

2 Likes

343i and Microsoft are more concerned about Halo than other publishers about e.g. CoD or BF, because Halo is THE flagship game of Microsoft and the only game of 343i. So the fact of trying to fix everything pretty fast, is no surprise for me.

It will be interesting, if this care of Halo will be kept up in the future, because Microsoft bought Activision/Blizzard and expanded there game repertoire in an immense way. Everyone is excited about crossovers like Doom/Halo, but I am more concerned, that Microsoft is not interested in investing in Halo that much anymore, because other games are way more profitable.

1 Like

I don’t agree about 343i being good at finishing content. If a game has to spend most of it’s time updating games over time after the launch to be complete then it’s not really something that should be praised. Right now the disc version of Halo Infinite has the least content of any mainline Halo series and they can slap random content as ā€˜updates’ and that won’t change that fact.

MCC may have been broken but it was playable and I could do most things fairly ok except for matchmaking stuff and that had plenty of content. While with Infinite as far as I can tell it has the bare minimum content and does not include splitscreen on the base game and never will do on disc because the game was rushed.

No I don’t believe they care about fixing things because they ignored the feedback on the last ā€˜beta’ and refused to delay the game any further leaving it in one of the worst states I’ve ever seen in any Halo game at launch and they lied about the progression system too.

They delayed before because everyone complained and they were going to release it in a worse state a year ago and I’m deeply concerned how less content there would have been if 343i didn’t listen and they had to do something because there reputation was on the line.

Right now I’m basically avoiding playing the game further at the moment because they haven’t listened and they haven’t cared about their fanbase and I’m not going to pretend they have when they only done minor changes and now we’re expected to wait till May for possible changes that may be good or bad.

3 Likes

If their strength lies in finishing things later rather than on launch, then this game will be their prodigy. If not, then it will be broken. Time will tell.

1 Like

Woah, you never used to post like this before, what changed?

If they really cared they would have stopped releasing threadbare, broken games the first time. They left MCC for dead for years and only started to properly address any of its issues when they needed something to sell the Xbox One X and then again when they needed something to fill the void during Infinite’s disaster of a dev cycle.

Sorry I can’t give them credit for fixing what they released broken/unfinished years after the fact when they are still asking full price and then some for it now I don’t see any demonstrable difference between 343 or any of the devs/publishers mentioned.

4 Likes

This topic is probably true. It may take 343i 3-5 years, but we will have a great product eventually. :rofl:

1 Like

Know what you mean and now that Infinite is out it feels like there abandoning MCC and now I’m concerned about cheaters in MCC and Infinite.

1 Like

I mean I did create the thread ā€œwhy Halo 3 will always be #1ā€ or whatever… Its in line with my way of thinking.

I’m overall torn between optimism and pessimism. Regardless, I think waiting years down the road to bring out your A game is a horrible idea, now its F2P so not crazy to think a F2P game can get back players (Gamepass games in general do this, so it has been proven to be the case even in regular games) but the gaming market is saturated with tons of games with huge amounts of content and large communities backing them, so it is difficult to imagine them growing their playerbase when the playerbase is a bunch of F2P gamers that have far better offers elsewhere.

This is irrelevant for Halo fans btw, Halo fans have shown that no matter what 343i do they’ll stick around, so I am confident it’ll end up being awesome for a core audience of like 10k players lol, but I seriously wonder how many people it’ll flatline to and if it will have any ability to draw in new players without Firefight or without a BR or without Forge and so on.

Edit: All the community at large has been talking about isn’t even new or interesting possibilities for Infinite going forward, all people are talking about is ā€œhow do we make Infinite look/feel like Halo Xā€ but in reality it needs to be better than those games. It isn’t just good enough to have 10 maps for example, because standards have only risen and competition has only gotten more fierce in recent years. I don’t want Halo 3/Reach, Infinite would have to blow people’s minds in order to be successful long term.

1 Like

It doesn’t matter for somebody like me who has been waiting since Reach for a proper Halo game. I don’t care about any of the other shooters on the market, they’re irelevant when it comes to Halo.It’s just a shame it came in such a piss poor situation and needs time to become what it should have been day 1.

1 Like

I mean have you tried MCC? :thinking:

Regardless, open your mind to other experiences lol. a decade is a long freaking time to wait for something. Lots of awesome games to enjoy today.

1 Like

No shade at you, I just remember you being on the other side of the coin is all. I’m pretty sure most of the things you just mentioned are what I had been telling you when the forum had just updated and you were totally opposed to them :man_shrugging:But in truth, it is too late to fix any damage done. Mark my words; the game will never have 200000 players at once ever again. It will shoot up and down surely, but the window of opportunity to have such a massive player base is most gone.

you say that but they’ve treated halo infinite nothing but a live service of money making, id rather go back to reach with its launch being the best and treating the entire game as a thing that will go on without support instead of ā€œsowwy our updwate bwoke big tweam bwattle, heres 5 bucksā€

2 Likes

Yes, I played MCC before and after patches. And I did play other FPS through the years,doesn’t mean any of them were fun enough for me to play more than a month or a few tops. The longest I played was Overwatch, but that was because I had a group …until they screwed the game,as blizard always does. The only fps I was and still am interested in is Halo to play in the long term but it seems I still have to wait . Not too bad,with Rimworld,Bannerlord and GP on Xbox I can wait.

It’s also got some backwards logic like the whole campaign not playable offline but the multiplayer is

1 Like