Just to all those saying they want a classic Halo 2 experience 2+2 is 4 which may equal a twice as better experience in Halo 4 to that of Halo 2 .
I like your logic!
I find it hard to argue this logic.
So, I’ll agree with it!
> Just to all those saying they want a classic Halo 2 experience 2+2 is 4 which may equal a twice as better experience in Halo 4 to that of Halo 2 .
You realize that does not prove anything do you not?
This means nothing. By that logic, 3+3= Halo 6 will be as good as Halo 3. Your logic is completely arbitrary and does not in any way mean Halo 4 will be twice as good as Halo 2. I personally feel Halo 4 wil be amazing and do very well, but 2+2=4 is irrelevant to how the game does.
> > Just to all those saying they want a classic Halo 2 experience 2+2 is 4 which may equal a twice as better experience in Halo 4 to that of Halo 2 .
>
> You realize that does not prove anything do you not?
Yep
NO.
Wait…
And another 2.
Two and two is 6 letters.
So you divide that by the trilogy, 3.
…Jesus.
…But if you multiply 500,000…
A MILLION?!
I’ll find the answer. I KNOW all the pieces are there. I’ll figure this out.
TO THE LAB!!
This is like Sarge connecting Nov 6 and 117.
Crazy bro.
> > Just to all those saying they want a classic Halo 2 experience 2+2 is 4 which may equal a twice as better experience in Halo 4 to that of Halo 2 .
>
> You realize that does not prove anything do you not?
You do realize that he’s joking around and having fun rather than being serious, do you not? 
No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
> No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
Have you played the original Halo? I am pretty sure without Combat Evolved there wouldn’t be a Halo 2.
> > No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
>
> Have you played the original Halo? I am pretty sure without Combat Evolved there wouldn’t be a Halo 2.
Uhhh, yeah? Your point?
Just because Halo CE was a good game does not mean that Halo 2 wasn’t a better game. That is of course up to the individual to decide.
But 2+2≡1(mod 3)
Wouldn’t that make Halo 4 as good as CE?
The plot thickens…
> This means nothing. By that logic, 3+3= Halo 6 will be as good as Halo 3. Your logic is completely arbitrary and does not in any way mean Halo 4 will be twice as good as Halo 2. I personally feel Halo 4 wil be amazing and do very well, but 2+2=4 is irrelevant to how the game does.
but what happens when you multiply 2 by three…you also get six…so halo six will be 3 times better than halo 2
brains blown, i know
*mind asplodes
> No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
I believe you mean no Halo game will be as good as Halo 2(Which I disagree with anyway). 
> > > No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
> >
> > Have you played the original Halo? I am pretty sure without Combat Evolved there wouldn’t be a Halo 2.
>
> Uhhh, yeah? Your point?
>
> Just because Halo CE was a good game does not mean that Halo 2 wasn’t a better game. That is of course up to the individual to decide.
Haha, I love it when people try to pull the “CE is better than Halo 2 because it came first” card. That’s like saying that those giant box computers that filled up whole rooms are better than laptops because “they came first” and that “without them there wouldn’t be laptops”. It’s ridiculous. On topic, I think 2 + 2 = 4 works very well.
> > No game will ever be better or as good as Halo 2.
>
> I believe you mean no Halo game will be as good as Halo 2(Which I disagree with anyway).
No, I mean any game. Even all the good games from Xbox ended with Call of Duty 4.