Who here accually think it means anything? I always ingore 1v1 requests when they are handed because I don’t care about proving myself to players, and I think that 1v1 are so boring. But what do you think?
It proves who can use the host advantage as much as possible.
Nothing more.
> It proves who can use the host advantage as much as possible.
>
> Nothing more.
A bit biased.
> > It proves who can use the host advantage as much as possible.
> >
> > Nothing more.
>
> A bit biased.
Hardly, if your host you have the advantage, if you have the advantage, you can plan more stuff out, if you played LAN for Reach, you would know spamming works like a joy on the DMR, having host is practically the same and barely gives the player a chance unless the host is a bad player.
Depends. 1v1 on MLG Sanctuary or whatever is totally worthless, since whoever dies first is just gonna be spawn killed. Countdown just turns into rocket camping. Zealot is okay.
IMO 1v1 maps should have the power weapons at max respawn time with no extra clips.
Meh, I just don’t think that’s the case for EVERY 1v1 game. Granted, I don’t play any myself nor have I played an LAN game since Red Alert 2 on PC.
All 1v1 is a joke. Who ever gets the first kill rounds up the power weapons and proceeds to camp. It was a joke in Halo 2, 3 and even more of a joke in Reach.
> All 1v1 is a joke. Who ever gets the first kill rounds up the power weapons and proceeds to camp. It was a joke in Halo 2, 3 and even more of a joke in Reach.
If there were proper 1v1 maps made this wouldn’t be an issue. Nothing worse than someone thinking they’re hot -Yoink- after sitting on 4 shot rockets all game.
> > All 1v1 is a joke. Who ever gets the first kill rounds up the power weapons and proceeds to camp. It was a joke in Halo 2, 3 and even more of a joke in Reach.
>
> If there were proper 1v1 maps made this wouldn’t be an issue. Nothing worse than someone thinking they’re hot Yoink! after sitting on 4 shot rockets all game.
Troof
> It proves who can use the host advantage as much as possible.
>
> Nothing more.
hmm good point
> It proves who can use the host advantage as much as possible.
>
> Nothing more.
This is very true. The only games where 1 v 1 mean anything, is games with dedicated servers.
From a guy who loves FFA, I think 1v1 is trash anyways. Its not about skill, its more about luck. Who gets host, who spawns closer to the power weapons, who sees who first, 1v1’s prove nothing. 4v4 or FFA is much better, sadly FFA in Reach is trash as well, with everyone using camo, or AL.
If we ignored the host advantage, and had a map that actually fits for 1v1, then we would be having a 1v1 that resembles skill. The problem is that maps generally aren’t designed for 1v1 gameplay and 99% of 1v1 matches are played online.
If you actually want to put your skill to test, you need to have a 2v2.