How could you actually take such a huge step backwards from MCC?
At a loss for words.
How could you actually take such a huge step backwards from MCC?
At a loss for words.
Oh come on. More natural objects are needed.
That’s just it:
There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
> 2784591733887633;1:
> a huge step backwards from MCC
This guy is talking about trees.
> 2535460970721475;4:
> > 2784591733887633;1:
> > a huge step backwards from MCC
>
>
> This guy is talking about trees.
brings up a good point. What if someone wanted to make a forest themed map?
> 2784591733887633;3:
> That’s just it:
>
> There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
Back in my day, there was only 1 tree on Blood Gulch, and Red base hogged it all to themselves.
> 2533274875211743;5:
> > 2535460970721475;4:
> > > 2784591733887633;1:
> > > a huge step backwards from MCC
> >
> >
> > This guy is talking about trees.
>
>
> brings up a good point. What if someone wanted to make a forest themed map?
Well, I do support his right to campaign for trees, and I’d upvote that. I’m just saying, it’s not a “huge step backwards” especially from the MCC, which was a clusteryoink, you know? But that does sound fun.
> 2661949065475413;6:
> > 2784591733887633;3:
> > That’s just it:
> >
> > There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
>
>
> Back in my day, there was only 1 tree on Blood Gulch, and Red base hogged it all to themselves.
Ah yes, good times around that tree.
omg this is the end of the world
Wow, you’re really reaching for something to complain about, huh?
> 2661949065475413;6:
> > 2784591733887633;3:
> > That’s just it:
> >
> > There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
>
>
> Back in my day, there was only 1 tree on Blood Gulch, and Red base hogged it all to themselves.
Yeah, Blue base was very hot. Freaking Red base and their fancy tree.
I haven’t tried forge yet, but if there really is only 1 tree that is somewhat disappointing. I enjoyed making outdoor maps for gameplay and aesthetic in Halo 4 and MCC. I’ve created entire forest’s for many different types of custom games.but now that could be more difficult 
> 2661949065475413;6:
> > 2784591733887633;3:
> > That’s just it:
> >
> > There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
>
>
> Back in my day, there was only 1 tree on Blood Gulch, and Red base hogged it all to themselves.
Yeah, well…welcome to the 21st Century.
> 2784591733887633;13:
> > 2661949065475413;6:
> > > 2784591733887633;3:
> > > That’s just it:
> > >
> > > There are a TON of new “Natural” objects…many more rocks…many more terrain pieces…and MANY LESS tree options.
> >
> >
> > Back in my day, there was only 1 tree on Blood Gulch, and Red base hogged it all to themselves.
>
>
> Yeah, well…welcome to the 21st Century.
Apparently there is only 1 tree in the 21st Century as well. Welcome to the 21st Century.
> 2535460970721475;4:
> > 2784591733887633;1:
> > a huge step backwards from MCC
>
>
> This guy is talking about trees.
Yeah…I am.
See; I am what you call a “Serious FORGER”.
I have been waiting for this update for a LONG TIME.
And while the improvements to Forge are obvious and notable,
SO ARE THE ABSENT OBJECTS AND FEATURES.
When we all called out for “More” in forge, we never expected to receive more at the expense of losing ANYTHING.
When you take away stuff to make room for new stuff, the net result is not “MORE”…it’s just “DIFFERENT”.
im really dissapointed in the map height. such a step back
> 2784591733887633;15:
> > 2535460970721475;4:
> > > 2784591733887633;1:
> > > a huge step backwards from MCC
> >
> >
> > This guy is talking about trees.
>
>
> Yeah…I am.
> See; I am what you call a “Serious FORGER”.
>
> I have been waiting for this update for a LONG TIME.
>
> And while the improvements to Forge are obvious and notable,
> SO ARE THE ABSENT OBJECTS AND FEATURES.
Read my next reply in this thread. I understand where you are coming from.