50 only makes it faster if you play around 13 matches compared to the old system. I think a simple 100 xp per match isnt making it too fasr but fast enough to feel lile you make some progression. I hope they implement this as fast as possible.
11 Likes
no, 50 is already too much.
No, it really isnât too much.
2 Likes
I think I just got an aneurysm from reading that 50 xp is "âtoo much.â 100 would be barely enough, 50 is hilariously low.
Even in Call of Duty, I can level up a battle pass tier in about 3 matches (maybe 4 if they are really fast or 2 if they are really long). When you finish or get stuck on your challenges then itâll take 20 matches to level up a tier. Thatâs laughable.
6 Likes
I really hope they make it 100 but the only way is if everyone says we need more xp per match so as long as we keep it a relevant topic and that at least 100 is a decent start then I think they will add it quickly, possibly in the next couple days.
Honestly, even meeting in the middle with 75 would be fine. As it stands Infinite has one of if not the grindiest Battle Pass I have seen in a long time.
I hate the Battle Pass system so damn much across the board, itâs not much less predatory than Loot Boxes. Especially when done badly like Infinite. At least in Halo 5 I COULD get nice cosmetics without paying a dime.
I 100% agree.
I was spending so much time last night and this morning asking people for a source if it would be 100 XP (everyone just assumed it would) I feared the 50 XP and canât believe it came to pass.
100 XP per game + the reworked challenges would be a great alternative while a more robust and rewarding system is created.
I can see why theyâve chosen a consistent 50xp, 343 still seemingly want to give the âChallenges give you more xp if you take the time to complete them approachâ.
That being said I feel it should be either 50 with match based bonuses (wins, objectives played etc etc) or should be 75 base. Currently it would take 20 matches to level up without any challenges, bringing this number down to 10-15 seems more comfortable to me, with the option of grinding challenges making it faster again.
1 Like
Yeah I agree with this.
Give us an incentive for winning or at least doing well, even if they tied it to personal performance and a certain threshold I would be fine with it.
It would solve the whole, throwing for challenges problem.
1 Like
It would leverage the already existing system for score too, currently a lot of players treat matches as âSlayer with optional objectivesâ. Introducing a performance based multiplier towards the end of the game encourages co-operation with the team and participation in objectives.
And of course, getting in the top 3 on slayer should definately award some bonus XP, Even if the bonuses are in the sub 50s, itâll slowly add up to a more rewarding system where you get say:
50xp Match Played
25xp Top 3 Score
25xp Win Bonus
- any objectives completed
Obviously the numbers themselves would need some serious thought, but itâs such an easy avenue to take and I really hope they take it.
1 Like
Idk i like having some xp more than 50 but i feel 100 should be the minimum because its not more xp than any weekly challenges and still doesnt level u up too much
I think itâd be cool if the +25 Top 3 Score in your idea was instead a âgood performanceâ score. I donât remember the game but I seem to remember a game where if you got 7 or more kills in a match then you got a small bonus just for performance.
I think thatâd be better than Top 3. It still promotes not AFKing (you have to get kills) but will give most people that extra little progression boost for at least trying.
2 Likes
I feel like a majority of the community that isnât happy with the current system would be satisfied with this until career progression is implemented
1 Like
Absolutely! Good idea, the huge bonus about this type of system is the sheer flexibility and creativity 343 could adopt to implement XP bonuses:
Got a killionaire? Great have x amount of xp. Killed someone with a grenade up a grav lift, X amount of xp. The system could be expanded to so many options and I donât think they should fear the creativity they could employ.
This would work great but i just think that 100 as the base is better because 50 is almost not even worth playing if your team is losing.
50 is totally fine considering this Battle Pass lasts till 2nd May 2022. I do hope they go for shorter seasons and then raise the daily xp with it tho.
1 Like
if it gets put to 100xp per match ppl will be completing the entire battlepass within the month
I thought so at first too but honestly after playing the last couple days since they updated it iv been leveling up fast. I bought the premium pass so I got the first 25 levels free, besides that I havenât purchased any levels or anything. I got all the weekly challenges except for the bonus Challenge before they reset them, after the reset a whole new set of challenges was there for me to unlock and after getting almost all of those done now I am level 42. Since every level is 1k XP if you do your challenges every week plus the 50 xp bonus youâll get this battlepass done in a couple weeks time easy. This game hasnât even been out a week and im almost level 50 already, im not worried about leveling up at all now the challenges got easier and you get 50xp every game now that really does make a difference.
At the least there should be a compromise by adding another challenge for winning a game, Iâve encountered so many players farming for XP by going AFK, this current system is so broken lol âŽ(âŻ-â°)â